Bombertalk

Read the post above yoiu. ALong with Kepler Bradley, I think we could have got something for Peverill and Json Johnson. the quote thing. Above the post you want to quote in the right hand corner, there is a a button that says 'quote'. Click that and it will take you to the reply page with the quote ...

Funny since I have a job. lmao!

Peverill. Jason Johnson. We might not have got anything for them, but I would have liked to have heard they were being shopped around.

I said you wanted tanking eliminated completly. That is the only draft system that does that.

Okie dokie then. SO you are saying Kepler is more valuable than those players? Considering we have at least 3 more years with Lloyd and Lucas?

Actually the PPV's are on Monday's here. Oh yeah!

Don't get me wrong, I'm not making a judgment on the quality of Knights as a coach. I just would have like to have seen him be more active during trade week.

Gumbelton, Neagle and a young fellow we are getting under the Father/Son Rule. Oh and Patty Ryder who can play up there. I also forgot Courtney Johns.

Your lost mate.

We'll be junk next year. We still rely on Lloyd, Lucas, Hird and Fletcher to win us games. With Hird gone, we will have to rely on the remaining three. Our midfield is nothing short of disgraceful. Dyson, Stanton, Winderlich, Watson should all be entering their prime, yet are average players at bes...

I think we should have been more active in trade week.
By the end of this season we will see if Knights has been able to develop our lists.
Maybe that is his plan. Go a season without alot of change. Try and develop them. And the players that do not come good will be moved on.

I said similiar...not INDENTICAL!

Now, my attitude in that scenario, would be, "Good thing we caught her out". No see, we can go through 100 different drafting systems and they will all have there negatives. You will not 100% remove tanking. Actually there is one way. All 16 teams go into a draw with one ball each. That is...

I thought Fremantle were offering there second round pick, but we wanted a first for Kepler?

Same old same old. Potential, potential, potential.

Sure, but they wouldn't be tanking the entire second half of the season. ALl I know is it is alot better than the current system.

Our list is going to look pretty similar. Knights hasn't made a good impression. Instead of devloping another a key forward in Kepler, we could have traded him for a second round pick and spent the same time developing a medfielder.

I'm afraid bottom four is looking a good chance at the moment.

You do know he was responding to Tom's post? Obviously I didn't. usually if you are not responding to the person directly above you, you will quote the person to avoid confusion. Obviously not everyone on here has a giant chip on their shoulder. Also obviously most people take the time to use prope...

It is the NBA drafting system. However they have a 30 team competition, with the entire bottom half being in the lottery.