Search found 7462 matches

by Gimps
Tue Apr 16, 2019 11:44 pm
Forum: Bombers Discussion
Topic: Zac Clarke
Replies: 66
Views: 1281

Re: Zac Clarke

Interesting situation. Thought he played very well yesterday around the ground. Provided many linking passages of play. The dilemma is bringing Joe Daniher back this week. Do we play 2.5 ruckmen? If these c**** even remotely consider putting Daniher in the ruck this week, they should be shot. The *...
by Gimps
Tue Apr 16, 2019 11:42 pm
Forum: Bombers Discussion
Topic: Zac Clarke
Replies: 66
Views: 1281

Re: Zac Clarke

Interesting situation. Thought he played very well yesterday around the ground. Provided many linking passages of play. The dilemma is bringing Joe Daniher back this week. Do we play 2.5 ruckmen? If these c**** even remotely consider putting Daniher in the ruck this week, they should be shot. The *...
by Gimps
Tue Apr 16, 2019 8:02 pm
Forum: Bombers Discussion
Topic: R5 Essendon v North Melbourne
Replies: 52
Views: 383

Re: R5 Essendon v North Melbourne

After 13 marks in defence, Hooker will be staying put. The only chance for Francis is if Ridley or Redman are dropped....which to be honest would be tough love for both those boys, especially Ridley who copped being the sacrificial lamb early in the season. I suspect it will be Redman out, Francis ...
by Gimps
Mon Apr 15, 2019 1:32 pm
Forum: Bombers Discussion
Topic: R5 Essendon v North Melbourne
Replies: 52
Views: 383

Re: R5 Essendon v North Melbourne

Couldn't possibly drop Brown - 25 Possies with 9 contested, 11 marks and 88% accuracy. Out TBell (injured), David Myers (broken nose - well any excuse really), In: Draper, Clarke, Tossing up whether to replace Ambrose with Francis given the job on the stager Mr floppy Brown (3 goals from stages yes...
by Gimps
Sun Apr 14, 2019 10:51 pm
Forum: Bombers Discussion
Topic: R4: Essendon Vs Lions
Replies: 93
Views: 953

Re: R4: Essendon Vs Lions

BenDoolan wrote:
Sun Apr 14, 2019 10:40 pm
Gimps wrote:
Sun Apr 14, 2019 10:35 pm
How much better does the team look without Langford?
By saying that, do you mean how much better we look with Myers?
Myers is junk. Replacing him with junk isn’t the answer. Rather give someone else a go.
by Gimps
Sun Apr 14, 2019 10:49 pm
Forum: Bombers Discussion
Topic: Zac Clarke
Replies: 66
Views: 1281

Re: Zac Clarke

Interesting situation. Thought he played very well yesterday around the ground. Provided many linking passages of play. The dilemma is bringing Joe Daniher back this week. Do we play 2.5 ruckmen? If these c**** even remotely consider putting Daniher in the ruck this week, they should be shot. The *...
by Gimps
Sun Apr 14, 2019 10:35 pm
Forum: Bombers Discussion
Topic: R4: Essendon Vs Lions
Replies: 93
Views: 953

Re: R4: Essendon Vs Lions

How much better does the team look without Langford?
by Gimps
Mon Apr 08, 2019 10:57 pm
Forum: Bombers Discussion
Topic: Open Letter to John Worsfold
Replies: 67
Views: 1006

Re: Open Letter to John Worsfold

Windy_Hill wrote:
Mon Apr 08, 2019 9:36 pm
Everyone disagrees with Gimps - it a national pastime :wink: :lol:

Have a good one
And everyone eventually knows they are wrong..
by Gimps
Sun Apr 07, 2019 9:32 pm
Forum: Bombers Discussion
Topic: R4: Essendon Vs Lions
Replies: 93
Views: 953

Re: R4: Essendon Vs Lions

Hooker in for McKernan.

Myers in for Mutch.

Myers has incriminating photos, remember?
by Gimps
Thu Apr 04, 2019 6:56 pm
Forum: Bombers Discussion
Topic: Kyle Languid
Replies: 122
Views: 2350

Re: Kyle Languid

How’s that vindication going for you Windy Hille? Dropped after 2 games, including one of the worst efforts I’ve seen in my life, going to the bench last week. I’m still happy to stick by him. I’ve explained those reasons elsewhere. Admittedly, he had a stinker last week. It happens. I thought he w...
by Gimps
Thu Apr 04, 2019 4:44 pm
Forum: Bombers Discussion
Topic: Kyle Languid
Replies: 122
Views: 2350

Re: Kyle Languid

How’s that vindication going for you Windy Hille?

Dropped after 2 games, including one of the worst efforts I’ve seen in my life, going to the bench last week.
by Gimps
Sun Mar 24, 2019 8:44 pm
Forum: Bombers Discussion
Topic: R1 Essendon v Greater Western Sydney
Replies: 77
Views: 780

Re: R1 Essendon v Greater Western Sydney

The AFL has confirmed that there was an issue with our GPS equipment.

They also confirmed that we were shitful.
by Gimps
Tue Mar 19, 2019 10:03 pm
Forum: Bombers Discussion
Topic: Heppell asks for patience
Replies: 78
Views: 1086

Re: Heppell asks for patience

why are we tweaking anything? We won 10 of our last 14 games for god's sake and should have probably won 12 of them. I will walk naked down Puckle St if we beat the Giants in Round 1. We look totally underdone in terms of fitness and match readiness. I want to be proven wrong but too much of the wr...
by Gimps
Sun Mar 03, 2019 10:47 pm
Forum: Bombers Discussion
Topic: Praccy Matches
Replies: 80
Views: 1191

Re: Praccy Matches

JLT 1 2018

Freo 101 - WCE 39

WCE won the flag. Freo were putrid.
by Gimps
Sat Mar 02, 2019 3:14 am
Forum: Bombers Discussion
Topic: Praccy Matches
Replies: 80
Views: 1191

Re: Praccy Matches

Boncer did clearly explain that only 2 of their walk up 2 played less than 70% game time. He then pointed out 6 of ours that are two key forwards and our best 4 midfielders. Pretty clear discrepancy. Langford was sloppy, even if he wasn’t putting in 100%. He was getting pushed off the ball by skinny...
by Gimps
Fri Mar 01, 2019 11:19 pm
Forum: Bombers Discussion
Topic: Praccy Matches
Replies: 80
Views: 1191

Re: Praccy Matches

Some of you people really make my brain hurt. Boncer’s post about TOG is a perfect example of why we didn’t win. It was also Carlton’s second practice match versus our first. And, if you actually watched the game properly, you would have seen that many of our players were only going at 3/4 as they d...
by Gimps
Thu Feb 21, 2019 8:50 pm
Forum: Bombers Discussion
Topic: First deal of Trade Period - Luke Lavender
Replies: 13
Views: 289

Re: First deal of Trade Period - Luke Lavender

Give us a spell, Windy. The bloke had post-season surgery in an attempt to fix an obvious issue. That obviously get him to the place he wanted to be. If the club thought he was no good, they would have given him the arse.

He was a Category B Rookie, who gives a shit.
by Gimps
Tue Feb 19, 2019 9:20 pm
Forum: Bombers Discussion
Topic: First deal of Trade Period - Luke Lavender
Replies: 13
Views: 289

Re: First deal of Trade Period - Luke Lavender

sorry for the young lad but surely this could have been a move made after last season and not on the cusp of the new one?? Likely he was trying to see how his body was holding up over the preseason, and if he thought he had a chance of making enough improvement to push for selection. With the addit...
by Gimps
Fri Feb 01, 2019 8:31 am
Forum: Bombers Discussion
Topic: Joe Daniher's Groin, Calf, Moustache, Little Pinky
Replies: 49
Views: 936

Re: Joe Daniher's Groin and the Implications

It’s good news, but a brief run around at full forward in match simulation isn’t anything to get too excited about. He still hasn’t hit top speed in straight line running. A long way to go. My contacts still saying Round 1 very unlikely.
by Gimps
Fri Jan 18, 2019 5:47 pm
Forum: Bombers Discussion
Topic: Merrett
Replies: 9
Views: 236

Re: Merrett

Told by another player that the club is telling them he’ll be out anywhere from 4-8 weeks. Will know more once the boot comes off.