Kerr
Kerr
if we are serious about getting Daniel Kerr and the Eagles play hard ball, i wouldn't be to upset if we traded Lovett and NLM for him.
Lovett is being traded anyway (according to everyone) and NLM shits me.
We probably lose a bit, but we gain Kerr, which takes the tagging pressure of watson and stanton
Lovett is being traded anyway (according to everyone) and NLM shits me.
We probably lose a bit, but we gain Kerr, which takes the tagging pressure of watson and stanton
Re: Kerr
Oh yeah, thats a fair deal.
Perhaps we can send C. Johns to Brisbane for Rischitelli?
They want our top 5 pick and if we allow it, I will never forgive Knights. (well I will, but ill still be upset)
Perhaps we can send C. Johns to Brisbane for Rischitelli?
They want our top 5 pick and if we allow it, I will never forgive Knights. (well I will, but ill still be upset)
- bomberdonnie
- Champion of Essendon
- Posts: 8575
- Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 7:25 pm
- Location: Old Hobart Town
Re: Kerr
Thread number 400 on this cnt
He is a virus we dont want him ffs!!
He is a virus we dont want him ffs!!
- Windy_Hill
- Champion of Essendon
- Posts: 12859
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:23 pm
Re: Kerr
[quote="robbie67"]Kerr is a gun with a lot of football left in him. We desperately need an elite mid-fielder. Give them pick 5 and Lovett.[/quote]
Here here!!
I would rather have a toxic Kerr than a toxic Lovett anyday
Here here!!
I would rather have a toxic Kerr than a toxic Lovett anyday
Re: Kerr
[quote="Windy_Hill"][quote="robbie67"]Kerr is a gun with a lot of football left in him. We desperately need an elite mid-fielder. Give them pick 5 and Lovett.[/quote]
Here here!!
I would rather have a toxic Kerr than a toxic Lovett anyday[/quote]
Lovett aint toxic. The moment he becomes a drug taking gangster, I might agree.
Here here!!
I would rather have a toxic Kerr than a toxic Lovett anyday[/quote]
Lovett aint toxic. The moment he becomes a drug taking gangster, I might agree.
Re: Kerr
Surely a young tall defender (Hurley) is a more pressing issue?
Our midfield's not great but it's not shite either - Watson, Stanton, McVeigh, Welsh, Reimers, Houli, Lonergan.
Our backline though is almost non-existent save for Fletcher and Ryder.
Our midfield's not great but it's not shite either - Watson, Stanton, McVeigh, Welsh, Reimers, Houli, Lonergan.
Our backline though is almost non-existent save for Fletcher and Ryder.
Re: Kerr
Kerr would be too risky I believe not only do you have his behaviour off field, you have his on field huge case of little man syndrome walks like pineapples stuck under his arms:) He is 24 and injury plagued can only see it getting worse as he gets older