Nick Stevens????

Doctor Fish · Post by **Doctor Fish** » Wed Oct 11, 2006 11:20 pm

I know it's a mad week for scurrilous, unfounded rumour. But on SEN this arvo I'm sure they said we were showing some interest. Tell me it's not true... Just checked the calender and April 1 is miles away...

DYSON#2 · Post by **DYSON#2** » Wed Oct 11, 2006 11:35 pm

pfff surley sheeds has more brains than that

BenDoolan · Post by **BenDoolan** » Thu Oct 12, 2006 12:10 am

Next.....

Tamworth Bomber · Post by **Tamworth Bomber** » Thu Oct 12, 2006 9:42 am

Rather Stevens than Milne

Crowny · Post by **Crowny** » Thu Oct 12, 2006 9:46 am

Wasnt there talk of getting him to Essendon about 2 or 3 years ago? Too late I reckon. I dont think he would add much.

Post by **danstar84** » Thu Oct 12, 2006 10:19 am

He would be on a fair bit also at Carlton. Not worth it though.

dingus · Post by **dingus** » Thu Oct 12, 2006 11:20 am

Soft, a frontrunner, shirks the issue. Buckley-lite.

We don't need no stinking Pea-hearts at Essendon. It took us two years to get rid of Murphy.

dodgey · Post by **dodgey** » Thu Oct 12, 2006 12:44 pm

Nup.... Even Sheeds limits himself to ONE ex-scum hack at a time

bueller · Post by **bueller** » Thu Oct 12, 2006 9:32 pm

If Carlton are prepared to lose Stevens after stating categorically they won't deal on Thornton, then they might as well fold now like they should anyway.
Basically its a load of rubbish. Even Carlton wouldn't do something like that unless they get a decent player and a 1st/2nd round pick.
What club would offer that ?.

Boyler_Room · Post by **Boyler_Room** » Fri Oct 13, 2006 9:51 am

Carlton wouldn't let Stevens go. They need midfielders to work with Marc Murphy and Stevens to get the ball forward to Fevola. That's been their priority (so I've been reading) since the season ended.

Crowny · Post by **Crowny** » Fri Oct 13, 2006 10:01 am

dodgey wrote:Nup.... Even Sheeds limits himself to ONE ex-scum hack at a time

No he doesnt. He got Murphy and Allan in the one year