brennan - i don't know what to think.

tom9779 · Post by **tom9779** » Thu Oct 11, 2007 4:22 pm

what is kind of ironic, only yesterday I was giving two of my mates who follow the lions so much shit over their forward line.... that without brown they aint much and Brennan is one of the most overrated players in the AFL.

now i am in a position of wondering to be happy to draft him.

Doctor Fish · Post by **Doctor Fish** » Fri Oct 12, 2007 10:05 am

Any know how old he is? I'd rather him than Ricky. At least he can win the odd game here and there...

BenDoolan · Post by **BenDoolan** » Fri Oct 12, 2007 10:14 am

Doctor Fish wrote:Any know how old he is? I'd rather him than Ricky. At least he can win the odd game here and there...

Brennan is 23 and Dyson is 22

Rossoneri · Post by **Rossoneri** » Fri Oct 12, 2007 10:25 am

Looks like we will be missing out on him as well.

billyduckworth · Post by **billyduckworth** » Fri Oct 12, 2007 10:33 am

So are we going to get anyone at all?
Time is running out!

Essendon4eva · Post by **Essendon4eva** » Fri Oct 12, 2007 10:43 am

Our list is going to look pretty similar. Knights hasn't made a good impression. Instead of devloping another a key forward in Kepler, we could have traded him for a second round pick and spent the same time developing a medfielder.

Rossoneri · Post by **Rossoneri** » Fri Oct 12, 2007 10:45 am

Essendon4eva wrote:Our list is going to look pretty similar. Knights hasn't made a good impression. Instead of devloping another a key forward in Kepler, we could have traded him for a second round pick and spent the same time developing a medfielder.

No one wants to take him with a second round pick.

Essendon4eva · Post by **Essendon4eva** » Fri Oct 12, 2007 10:47 am

I thought Fremantle were offering there second round pick, but we wanted a first for Kepler?

BenDoolan · Post by **BenDoolan** » Fri Oct 12, 2007 11:10 am

Essendon4eva wrote:Our list is going to look pretty similar. Knights hasn't made a good impression. Instead of devloping another a key forward in Kepler, we could have traded him for a second round pick and spent the same time developing a medfielder.

How is it "looking similar" when Hird, Camporeale, Bolton, Heffernan, Cole are off the list? And if no club is willing to give 2nd round picks for our defects, what else can Knights do?

Essendon4eva · Post by **Essendon4eva** » Fri Oct 12, 2007 11:26 am

I said similiar...not INDENTICAL!

Post by **Jazz_84** » Fri Oct 12, 2007 11:28 am

Essendon4eva wrote:I said similiar...not INDENTICAL!

name a team that hasn't ever looked "similar" after trade week?

Post by **Jazz_84** » Fri Oct 12, 2007 11:29 am

Essendon4eva wrote:Our list is going to look pretty similar. Knights hasn't made a good impression. Instead of devloping another a key forward in Kepler, we could have traded him for a second round pick and spent the same time developing a medfielder.

yeah because we've got plenty of developing forwards ready for the exit of Lloyd and Lucas.........

Essendon4eva · Post by **Essendon4eva** » Fri Oct 12, 2007 11:34 am

Gumbelton, Neagle and a young fellow we are getting under the Father/Son Rule. Oh and Patty Ryder who can play up there. I also forgot Courtney Johns.

Post by **Jazz_84** » Fri Oct 12, 2007 11:37 am

ummm yeah Kepler is further along then any of those in terms of playing in the forward line, including Johns

Essendon4eva · Post by **Essendon4eva** » Fri Oct 12, 2007 11:41 am

Okie dokie then. SO you are saying Kepler is more valuable than those players? Considering we have at least 3 more years with Lloyd and Lucas?

Post by **Jazz_84** » Fri Oct 12, 2007 11:46 am

didn't he just win the Best and Fairest for Bendigo under Knights? umm yes he did..... ever think he might like to inject him into the Essendon forward line where he never got a go under sheedy???? i do, how about you?

BenDoolan · Post by **BenDoolan** » Fri Oct 12, 2007 11:51 am

Essendon4eva wrote:I said similiar...not INDENTICAL!

No shit Sherlock - EVERY club will look SIMILAR

Post by **Jazz_84** » Fri Oct 12, 2007 11:55 am

Jazz_84 wrote:
Essendon4eva wrote:I said similiar...not INDENTICAL!
name a team that hasn't ever looked "similar" after trade week?

haha Ben im still waiting for an answer to that very question

Essendon4eva · Post by **Essendon4eva** » Fri Oct 12, 2007 11:57 am

BenDoolan wrote:
Essendon4eva wrote:I said similiar...not INDENTICAL!
No shit Sherlock - EVERY club will look SIMILAR

And...the difference is. What have we added?

Jazz_84 wrote:didn't he just win the Best and Fairest for Bendigo under Knights? umm yes he did..... ever think he might like to inject him into the Essendon forward line where he never got a go under sheedy???? i do, how about you?

Lmao. The same league where Houli was etting 30+ possies every game. the same league Dyson was getting 20+. Kepler one the B/F playing against hacks!

Post by **Jazz_84** » Fri Oct 12, 2007 12:00 pm

Essendon4eva wrote:
BenDoolan wrote:
Essendon4eva wrote:I said similiar...not INDENTICAL!
No shit Sherlock - EVERY club will look SIMILAR
And...the difference is. What have we added?

Jazz_84 wrote:didn't he just win the Best and Fairest for Bendigo under Knights? umm yes he did..... ever think he might like to inject him into the Essendon forward line where he never got a go under sheedy???? i do, how about you?
Lmao. The same league where Houli was etting 30+ possies every game. the same league Dyson was getting 20+. Kepler one the B/F playing against hacks!

you missed the entire point of my post but thats ok i expected it........ understand this mate, Bradley won B&F playing up forward so maybe he wants to play him up forward for Essendon.... understand? or are you going to go off topic just so you can sound smart again??