keri wrote:I've heard the same mail from someone who allegedly has a connection inside the club - how true it is, I don't know. The mail was that MJ is off but JJ is staying.
Anyone else not quite see the logic in that? Not that I don't think both players have something left to give, but surely you'd pivk MJ over JJ at the moment?
Or is that just me?
I don't see the point in keeping JJ over Johnno either. I know JJ is under contract but i would rather keep Johnno for another couple of yuears and replace JJ in the side with Hocking.
