Spot on.Windy_Hill wrote:uptick wrote:No chance we'll have to give the BEARS anything. All that will happen is that in future retiring players will be required to offer their services to the old club prior to reactivating theirt careers, assuming they are still under contract at the time of retirement. End of story. Haver said that , I'm going to enjoy the journey between today, and round one when he runs out in the RED and BLACK.
I am not sure it will work this way. I dont think the AFL needs to introduce any new rules because simply put, the law of contract should prevail. This is simply a case of Brisbane not crossing the T's and dotting the I's. Remenber, they agreed to tear up Michael's contract. He therefore has every legal right to do what he is doing. If Brisbane had been smarter they would have simply held onto the contract but agreed with Michael not to pay any money.
Why are Brisbane so pissed off- because like anyone in this situation, the just feel stupid for letting it happen and are trying to deflect the blame onto everyone else.
I actually can't believe what Mal Michael has done to Brisbane though. He has given them one swift kick in the nuts. I reckon 99.99% of players wouldn't have done what he's done, he just happens to be the 0.01% that would. Brisbane are pissed off because they have been embarrassed, and they are seething and want blood. But in reality, they made him a free agent.