2019 AFL Tribunal

For all things non Essendon related, tell us how much you hate the Blues, Pies, etc.
Post Reply
User avatar
s'dreams
Club Captain
Posts: 3824
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 5:48 pm

2019 AFL Tribunal

Post by s'dreams » Wed Apr 10, 2019 1:32 pm

Dusty should thank Kennedy with free drinks for a night during the off season.

If the AFL is cracking down on behind/off the play incidents and have got rid off jumper punches - they should stand firm no matter who it is or whether the person was hurt, hurt badly or just laughed it off. Otherwise its just a mess.

Gaff didn't mean to break Brayshaw's jaw either.
dices ad adepto futui (tell them to f*** off)

desmondo
High Draft Pick
Posts: 964
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2012 12:37 pm

Re: 2019 AFL Tribunal

Post by desmondo » Wed Apr 10, 2019 3:55 pm

Martin is a 'protected' species for some reason...

Definately deserved 2 weeks if not 3 for the elbow to the head.

nudder12
Regular Senior Player
Posts: 1780
Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 11:47 pm

Re: 2019 AFL Tribunal

Post by nudder12 » Wed Apr 10, 2019 8:00 pm

s'dreams wrote:
Wed Apr 10, 2019 1:32 pm

If the AFL is cracking down on behind/off the play incidents and have got rid off jumper punches - they should stand firm no matter who it is or whether the person was hurt, hurt badly or just laughed it off. Otherwise its just a mess.
Too much weight placed on the damage caused. If they want to get rid of all the thuggery (and they should), then they should be placing weight on the action.
An elbow to the head deserves at least 4 weeks.
And every punch should get at least 1. None of this fines rubbish.

grassy1
Champion of Essendon
Posts: 7819
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 8:48 pm

Re: 2019 AFL Tribunal

Post by grassy1 » Thu Apr 11, 2019 12:05 am

Absolutely,he should have got 4 weeks for that Bullshit Act.

Absolute Bullshit he got only 1 week,when he needed a kick up the arse at the Tribunal.

Oh for the days of Jack Gaffney.

User avatar
rockhole
Club Captain
Posts: 4789
Joined: Mon Sep 11, 2006 10:31 am
Location: La Grange

Re: 2019 AFL Tribunal

Post by rockhole » Fri Apr 12, 2019 7:42 pm

nudder12 wrote:
Wed Apr 10, 2019 8:00 pm
s'dreams wrote:
Wed Apr 10, 2019 1:32 pm

If the AFL is cracking down on behind/off the play incidents and have got rid off jumper punches - they should stand firm no matter who it is or whether the person was hurt, hurt badly or just laughed it off. Otherwise its just a mess.
Too much weight placed on the damage caused. If they want to get rid of all the thuggery (and they should), then they should be placing weight on the action.
An elbow to the head deserves at least 4 weeks.
And every punch should get at least 1. None of this fines rubbish.
Of course Martin was aiming at the players shoulder hoping to give him a bit of a corky. It wasn't his fault that the blow crept up to the player's head.
Once again we see the hopeless inconsistency of the AFL tribunal. Head high is head high whether it is deliberate, accidental or misguided. It now appears that you can elbow a player in the head off the ball as long as the contact is not "forceful". What a joke.
Too far for Baker now he's on to it, now he’s got it, OPEN GOAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The Dons are in front by one point at the 8 minute mark

nudder12
Regular Senior Player
Posts: 1780
Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 11:47 pm

Re: 2019 AFL Tribunal

Post by nudder12 » Sat Apr 13, 2019 11:34 pm

More grist for the mill......Pies Mihocek exonerated for striking Libba in the marking contest.
I admit this one was touch and go, and I probably wouldn't even mention it except the official explanation left me bemused......
"Mihocek was seeking to spoil when high contact was made with an open hand." Errrr, really? Who spoils with an open hand? And the video looked more like a fist to me. But yeah, not a lot in it, but it highlight's the rubbish that the MRO comes out with.
BTW - can we stop using this official MRO title, and just say "MIchael Christian reckons....." It's a joke that these decisions come down to the opinion of just one person, an ex-player at that, and with barely any real guidelines except "what do you think Michael?"

User avatar
s'dreams
Club Captain
Posts: 3824
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 5:48 pm

Re: 2019 AFL Tribunal

Post by s'dreams » Sun Apr 14, 2019 10:02 pm

Wonder if Danger gets off this week for the behind the play "love tap"?

Setterfield will surely go for the sling tackle that resulted in the concussion of Powell

Can Myers go for attacking Hipwood's boots with his nose? Just asking for a friend.

Re Mihocek ... He got off because everyone wants to hit Libba. No - it seems it's back to the "did the receiver need to leave the field?" question.
dices ad adepto futui (tell them to f*** off)

grassy1
Champion of Essendon
Posts: 7819
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 8:48 pm

Re: 2019 AFL Tribunal

Post by grassy1 » Mon Apr 15, 2019 12:22 am

(Sigh).

Yeah,Danger will probably get off.If the reverse happened,however,........... :roll:

User avatar
s'dreams
Club Captain
Posts: 3824
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 5:48 pm

Re: 2019 AFL Tribunal

Post by s'dreams » Mon Apr 15, 2019 7:15 pm

grassy1 wrote:
Mon Apr 15, 2019 12:22 am
(Sigh).

Yeah,Danger will probably get off.If the reverse happened,however,........... :roll:
Danger got off...
The first incident, where Dangerfield caught de Boer with an elbow to the stomach, was graded as intentional conduct with low impact to the body by Michael Christian. However, Christian chose not to sanction the Cats superstar for the second motion in the same incident, where Dangerfield narrowly missed de Boer's head with a swinging arm.

"It was absolutely assessed," Christian told AFL.com.au's The Verdict. "But, in the end, it was determined that there was insufficient force to constitute offence."
So actions taken off the ball now have nil additional loading (instead of giving the "potential to cause injury" penalty), and given the 2 weeks for Setterfield and the week to McDonald, penalties are tied proportionally to the impact on the victim.

Even the "Toby Greene" rule has gone by the wayside with Hipwood not even being fined for "careless contact" of Myers when he stuck his leg out in the marking contest.

So why bother even making a song and dance about new rules and interpretations if at the first hurdle they fall down? What a wank.

PS. TBell was fined $2K for striking Zorko... must have been a weak effort.
dices ad adepto futui (tell them to f*** off)

nudder12
Regular Senior Player
Posts: 1780
Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 11:47 pm

Re: 2019 AFL Tribunal

Post by nudder12 » Mon Apr 15, 2019 10:14 pm

s'dreams wrote:
Mon Apr 15, 2019 7:15 pm
grassy1 wrote:
Mon Apr 15, 2019 12:22 am
(Sigh).

Yeah,Danger will probably get off.If the reverse happened,however,........... :roll:
Danger got off...
The first incident, where Dangerfield caught de Boer with an elbow to the stomach, was graded as intentional conduct with low impact to the body by Michael Christian. However, Christian chose not to sanction the Cats superstar for the second motion in the same incident, where Dangerfield narrowly missed de Boer's head with a swinging arm.

"It was absolutely assessed," Christian told AFL.com.au's The Verdict. "But, in the end, it was determined that there was insufficient force to constitute offence."
So actions taken off the ball now have nil additional loading (instead of giving the "potential to cause injury" penalty), and given the 2 weeks for Setterfield and the week to McDonald, penalties are tied proportionally to the impact on the victim.

Even the "Toby Greene" rule has gone by the wayside with Hipwood not even being fined for "careless contact" of Myers when he stuck his leg out in the marking contest.

So why bother even making a song and dance about new rules and interpretations if at the first hurdle they fall down? What a wank.

PS. TBell was fined $2K for striking Zorko... must have been a weak effort.
It's all total BS. I'm fuming - regardless of teams/players involved - just want a fair and appropriate judicial system for all, that gets rid of the violence.

grassy1
Champion of Essendon
Posts: 7819
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 8:48 pm

Re: 2019 AFL Tribunal

Post by grassy1 » Tue Apr 16, 2019 2:20 am

AWFULL must have WWE scriptwriters operating at the MRP/Tribunal,for them to be making it up as they go along. :roll:

nudder12
Regular Senior Player
Posts: 1780
Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 11:47 pm

Re: 2019 AFL Tribunal

Post by nudder12 » Sat Apr 20, 2019 12:14 am

And on it goes......
Zorko gets a fine for an elbow to the back of the head of Adams.
While the rest of the country is trying to eliminate the "coward punch", twice in a few weeks the AFL condones elbows to the head of someone who didn't even see it coming.
Pathetic.

Post Reply