Page 1 of 1
Selection poblem
Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 9:31 pm
by Ryno
With westcoast trying to make room for Banfield, Staker, Rosa, and Wirrapunda in the Grand final side. Staker young up and coming CHB/CHF from ACT, if he misses the GF it would be worth getting in his ear and trying to get him to return closer to home. I know I wold be dirty if I played all year and missed the GF so Banfield could play as part of his retirment (probably)......What do you guys think and what would you pay / Trade. Laycock/Staker?
Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 9:33 pm
by Jazz_84
laycock for staker sounds alright
Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 9:41 pm
by Gossy7
I thought it was Banfield was in the team... But was likely to make room for Wirrpunda?
Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 9:43 pm
by Ryno
Yeah wirrapunda, staker and rosa are out of the side at the moment. They are not sure who to drop to bring them in. Banfield played in the 94 GF with Woosha... I believe.
Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 9:49 pm
by Gossy7
Oh ok... I just thought you were trying to make out that Banfield should be brought into the team, when hes already in!
Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 1:42 am
by Doctor Fish
Staker would be a good pick up if he can get some consistency. I had him in my dreamteam this year. Damn near drove me nuts. He'd go out and cream the opposition one week then totally go missing the following week. I'm sure as he gains experience this will change.
Good call about getting in his ear if he misses out though. Would be good to have in the team. Is he Victorian?
Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 7:00 am
by Ryno
He is from the ACT/ Rams according to his details on their web site. I had him in my dream team also, he seemed to play really well in the back line and was hot and cold when they put him forward. He is only 22 I think so still only young. Played all bar one game I believe.
Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 8:47 pm
by bomberflyer
Staker is from Broken Hill like Solly!!
Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 10:29 pm
by sash
Would love to get him for laycock but I highly doubt the deal would go through. We'd only need to play him down back which is good too.
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 11:25 am
by j-mac31
I doubt Staker would leave. I don't know if he was in the team last week or will be this week, but he has played most games and gives them a good 3rd tall option up forward and can go back.
And why would they want Laycock? They've got big Cox and Seaby aint too bad.
Plus we should keep him because I think he will be very good, and I think Hille is rubbish and Cartledge may be cut.
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 11:41 am
by Boyler_Room
I think the talk about Laycock is because he's supposedly requested a move. I hope he stays.
I like Staker but we're going to have one choc-a-bloc forward line next year. Not sure there's room for a Staker as well... and he's no CHB.
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 11:56 am
by swoodley
Where is all this talk of Staker coming from?
Living in Perth, I have the unfortunate luck of having the eagles on tv every week.
This guy makes as many mistakes as Bradley and is hot and cold like Laycock. He is not the big body player we need to play on the likes of Hall, Brown and co.
They would eat him for breakfast
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 1:06 pm
by Tamworth Bomber
swoodley wrote:Where is all this talk of Staker coming from?
Living in Perth, I have the unfortunate luck of having the eagles on tv every week.
This guy makes as many mistakes as Bradley and is hot and cold like Laycock. He is not the big body player we need to play on the likes of Hall, Brown and co.
They would eat him for breakfast
Maybe Bradley for Staker??
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 2:52 pm
by swoodley
Tamworth Bomber wrote:swoodley wrote:Where is all this talk of Staker coming from?
Living in Perth, I have the unfortunate luck of having the eagles on tv every week.
This guy makes as many mistakes as Bradley and is hot and cold like Laycock. He is not the big body player we need to play on the likes of Hall, Brown and co.
They would eat him for breakfast
Maybe Bradley for Staker??
I'll keep Bradley thanks
Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 1:51 pm
by Crazyman
swoodley wrote:Tamworth Bomber wrote:swoodley wrote:Where is all this talk of Staker coming from?
Living in Perth, I have the unfortunate luck of having the eagles on tv every week.
This guy makes as many mistakes as Bradley and is hot and cold like Laycock. He is not the big body player we need to play on the likes of Hall, Brown and co.
They would eat him for breakfast
Maybe Bradley for Staker??
I'll keep Bradley thanks
That is a big call
Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 6:02 pm
by j-mac31
swoodley wrote:Tamworth Bomber wrote:swoodley wrote:Where is all this talk of Staker coming from?
Living in Perth, I have the unfortunate luck of having the eagles on tv every week.
This guy makes as many mistakes as Bradley and is hot and cold like Laycock. He is not the big body player we need to play on the likes of Hall, Brown and co.
They would eat him for breakfast
Maybe Bradley for Staker??
I'll keep Bradley thanks
I'd rather Staker - less unco.
Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 6:50 pm
by swoodley
j-mac wrote:swoodley wrote:Tamworth Bomber wrote:swoodley wrote:Where is all this talk of Staker coming from?
Living in Perth, I have the unfortunate luck of having the eagles on tv every week.
This guy makes as many mistakes as Bradley and is hot and cold like Laycock. He is not the big body player we need to play on the likes of Hall, Brown and co.
They would eat him for breakfast
Maybe Bradley for Staker??
I'll keep Bradley thanks
I'd rather Staker - less unco.
Bradley bulked up over summer and has taken time to adjust to his new shape. He will probably spend more time this summer working on skills (rather than weights) and should improve next year.