Page 1 of 1
Nick Stevens????
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 11:20 pm
by Doctor Fish
I know it's a mad week for scurrilous, unfounded rumour. But on SEN this arvo I'm sure they said we were showing some interest. Tell me it's not true... Just checked the calender and April 1 is miles away...
](./images/smilies/eusa_wall.gif "Brick wall")
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 11:35 pm
by DYSON#2
pfff surley sheeds has more brains than that
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 12:10 am
by BenDoolan
Next.....
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 9:42 am
by Tamworth Bomber
Rather Stevens than Milne
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 9:46 am
by Crowny
Wasnt there talk of getting him to Essendon about 2 or 3 years ago? Too late I reckon. I dont think he would add much.
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 10:19 am
by danstar84
He would be on a fair bit also at Carlton. Not worth it though.
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 11:20 am
by dingus
Soft, a frontrunner, shirks the issue. Buckley-lite.
We don't need no stinking Pea-hearts at Essendon. It took us two years to get rid of Murphy.
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 12:44 pm
by dodgey
Nup.... Even Sheeds limits himself to ONE ex-scum hack at a time
Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 9:32 pm
by bueller
If Carlton are prepared to lose Stevens after stating categorically they won't deal on Thornton, then they might as well fold now like they should anyway.
Basically its a load of rubbish. Even Carlton wouldn't do something like that unless they get a decent player and a 1st/2nd round pick.
What club would offer that ?.
Posted: Fri Oct 13, 2006 9:51 am
by Boyler_Room
Carlton wouldn't let Stevens go. They need midfielders to work with Marc Murphy and Stevens to get the ball forward to Fevola. That's been their priority (so I've been reading) since the season ended.
Posted: Fri Oct 13, 2006 10:01 am
by Crowny
dodgey wrote:Nup.... Even Sheeds limits himself to ONE ex-scum hack at a time
No he doesnt. He got Murphy and Allan in the one year