Maxwell's bump
Posted: Tue Feb 10, 2009 4:17 pm
The great forum in name of the Essendon Football Club
http://bombertalk4.com/
Spot on Rocky.rockhole wrote:Total crap decision. if the morons running the game want to take the bump out of the equation, we may as well revert to a non contact sport. How the hell are the players expected to know what passes muster and what is illegal. From what I saw, Maxwell did everything possible within the rules and still cops 3 weeks.
I am sure they make stuff up on the run and this is the calssic knee jerk reaction.
=D> I agree.ealesy wrote:that doggish Scum Irish git only get 4 weeks for smashing his teammate in the face and then kicking him when he was down. f****** Hall got 8 weeks for a hit very similar on Staker, yet he did not kick him when he was down.
Duty of care? May as well pull the game apart and just play marbles. It appears the administrators have lost theirs...j-mac wrote:Absolute crap decision. And on SEN they keep coming back to the "duty of care" crap. I can't think what it is, but there is also some latin legal phrase that essentially means you can't be awarded damages for foreseeable injury. The example used back in yr12 was a boxer "signs up" to be hit in the head, so can't claim for brain damage.
Surely this short of stuff should be the same?
=D> I agree.ealesy wrote:that doggish Scum Irish git only get 4 weeks for smashing his teammate in the face and then kicking him when he was down. f****** Hall got 8 weeks for a hit very similar on Staker, yet he did not kick him when he was down.
The shirtfront is, to all intents and purposes, effectively banned already as far as i can deduce. The AFL haven't expressly banned the shirtfront, but any contact made to an opponent's head resulting from a front-on bump is basically bound to be reported, and i can't see how it's possible to give out a shirtfront without making some contact with the other guy's head - the very nature of the forces involved will see to it that the head of the guy who's on the receiving end of a shirtfront will jolt forward and thus make contact with the shoulder/upper arm of the player giving out the bump. So yeah, everyone knows 100% that going a guy's head with your hip when his head is over the ball is reportable (i.e. Ben Johnson/Daniel Bell incident), but i think it's at least implied that even if a player is standing upright, you still can't bump him front on and expect to escape report. I reckon a bump like Jason Johnson's against John Blakey in the 2000 pre-season (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5p76ad8wukI) would get plenty of weeks now, whereas then, it was just a great, fair hit.Staggy wrote:Bumping will be banned altogether in the next few years. You watch.
For a good shirtfront, just refer back to the 2000 preseason Final where JJ smashed one of the Norf players...best shirtfront I had seen in many a year. Was off the ball and would probably get 2 to 4 weeks in the soft day and age of non-contact football...jimmyc1985 wrote:The shirtfront is, to all intents and purposes, effectively banned already as far as i can deduce. The AFL haven't expressly banned the shirtfront, but any contact made to an opponent's head resulting from a front-on bump is basically bound to be reported, and i can't see how it's possible to give out a shirtfront without making some contact with the other guy's head - the very nature of the forces involved will see to it that the head of the guy who's on the receiving end of a shirtfront will jolt forward and thus make contact with the shoulder/upper arm of the player giving out the bump. So yeah, everyone knows 100% that going a guy's head with your hip when his head is over the ball is reportable (i.e. Ben Johnson/Daniel Bell incident), but i think it's at least implied that even if a player is standing upright, you still can't bump him front on and expect to escape report. I reckon a bump like Jason Johnson's against John Blakey in the 2000 pre-season (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5p76ad8wukI) would get plenty of weeks now, whereas then, it was just a great, fair hit.Staggy wrote:Bumping will be banned altogether in the next few years. You watch.
This is a shit state of affairs - i thought Maxwell's bump was great, and i think Maxwell is a massive flog.
Ummmm...i specifically mentioned the JJ hit on John Blakey in the 2000 pre-season match in the post of mine that you quoted, and even provided the youtube link to the incidentCrazyman wrote:For a good shirtfront, just refer back to the 2000 preseason Final where JJ smashed one of the Norf players...best shirtfront I had seen in many a year. Was off the ball and would probably get 2 to 4 weeks in the soft day and age of non-contact football...jimmyc1985 wrote:The shirtfront is, to all intents and purposes, effectively banned already as far as i can deduce. The AFL haven't expressly banned the shirtfront, but any contact made to an opponent's head resulting from a front-on bump is basically bound to be reported, and i can't see how it's possible to give out a shirtfront without making some contact with the other guy's head - the very nature of the forces involved will see to it that the head of the guy who's on the receiving end of a shirtfront will jolt forward and thus make contact with the shoulder/upper arm of the player giving out the bump. So yeah, everyone knows 100% that going a guy's head with your hip when his head is over the ball is reportable (i.e. Ben Johnson/Daniel Bell incident), but i think it's at least implied that even if a player is standing upright, you still can't bump him front on and expect to escape report. I reckon a bump like Jason Johnson's against John Blakey in the 2000 pre-season (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5p76ad8wukI) would get plenty of weeks now, whereas then, it was just a great, fair hit.Staggy wrote:Bumping will be banned altogether in the next few years. You watch.
This is a shit state of affairs - i thought Maxwell's bump was great, and i think Maxwell is a massive flog.
oops...didn't read the whole thread...saw the youtube link but can't access at work...I have been trying to find that for ages...jimmyc1985 wrote:Ummmm...i specifically mentioned the JJ hit on John Blakey in the 2000 pre-season match in the post of mine that you quoted, and even provided the youtube link to the incident.