extremely harsh, included for every match this year and dropped for the Grand Final, i would be gutted and quite frankly pretty pissed off with the club!!There had been speculation that Drew Banfield or Steven Armstrong could be eased out of the line-up, but the West Coast selectors opted for Graham who played every home and away match for the Eagles as well as last week's prelim.
Wirra IN - Graham OUT
Wirra IN - Graham OUT
- jimmyc1985
- Champion of Essendon
- Posts: 5869
- Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 11:33 pm
- Location: Position A
A big story in the West Australian about Graham growing up living with his Grandparents and how they have made it to Melbourne for the game. A real human interest story buggered up by a decision at the selection table. ![Sad :(](./images/smilies/icon_sad.gif)
![Sad :(](./images/smilies/icon_sad.gif)
"You can quote me on this... He is gawn" - bomberdonnie re Hurley's contract status 25 February 2012
- jimmyc1985
- Champion of Essendon
- Posts: 5869
- Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 11:33 pm
- Location: Position A
...Even though i think it'll probably end up being the right decision in hindsight, it's interesting to see that Worsfold has gone with the sentiment rather than selection merits alone. You'd think Worsfold would be the last guy on earth who'd choose sentimentality over logic. Perhaps Graham should've got in on selection merit, but dropping a guy before a Grand Final immediately prior to retirement in Banfield would be very harsh too. Considering that i reckon the Eagles will be a top 4 side for at least the next 3 years, Graham will get his chance another day.
Also, the fact that Phil Matera last year and Worsfold himself in 1998 wound up missing a finals match immediately prior to retirement probably influenced him as well. He'd know it's a crappy feeling to retire without the opportunity of playing in what is a player's last match.
Also, the fact that Phil Matera last year and Worsfold himself in 1998 wound up missing a finals match immediately prior to retirement probably influenced him as well. He'd know it's a crappy feeling to retire without the opportunity of playing in what is a player's last match.
Re: Wirra IN - Graham OUT
Ah yes its not like essendon would do anything like that. Not!!Jazz_84 wrote:extremely harsh, included for every match this year and dropped for the Grand Final, i would be gutted and quite frankly pretty pissed off with the club!!There had been speculation that Drew Banfield or Steven Armstrong could be eased out of the line-up, but the West Coast selectors opted for Graham who played every home and away match for the Eagles as well as last week's prelim.
Was dropping Derick kickett to keep Watson in the gf a mistake?
Hard call, but the coach would know what best suits his immediate and future requirements.
Re: Wirra IN - Graham OUT
Ah yes its not like essendon would do anything like that. Not!!
Was dropping Derick kickett to keep Watson in the gf a mistake?
Hard call, but the coach would know what best suits his immediate and future requirements.[/quote]
With regard to Kickett he had several chances to stake a claim in previous matches. He was lucky that he wasnt dropped beforehand and his form in the previous weeks hadnt been that good.
Was dropping Derick kickett to keep Watson in the gf a mistake?
Hard call, but the coach would know what best suits his immediate and future requirements.[/quote]
With regard to Kickett he had several chances to stake a claim in previous matches. He was lucky that he wasnt dropped beforehand and his form in the previous weeks hadnt been that good.
Not sure that the decision to drop Graham ahead of Banfield is necessarily based on sentiment alone. Banfield hasn't had that bad of a year. The other major factor is that he is the most experienced player in the team - and you want experienced players in Grand Finals.
If its a line ball decision between a kid and a veteran, in a GF i reckon you would go for the veteran almost every time.
If its a line ball decision between a kid and a veteran, in a GF i reckon you would go for the veteran almost every time.
I don't totally agree that Banfield was only selected due Worsfold finding it too hard to drop his old mate.
Banfield has finals experience and has been in a winning GF side, knows what it takes, and can still provide some pace and leadership.
I think its usually the young players who struggle on GF day under immense pressure - and maybe the right call was made.
Banfield has finals experience and has been in a winning GF side, knows what it takes, and can still provide some pace and leadership.
I think its usually the young players who struggle on GF day under immense pressure - and maybe the right call was made.