bomberdonnie wrote:1974
1974 was my second choice......
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
bomberdonnie wrote:1974
I would take a '98 type season, we were competitive in every game and our biggest loss was only 24 points. As for '99 f*** no.filthy2 wrote:98-99'ish.
98 was a breakthrough season for us, I think about it frequently and I'm really glad someone has mentioned it. We where never in the hunt for a flag but played consistently good footy week in week out. If we can play anything like we did that year I would be wrapped (probably helped that we unearthed a couple of talents by the names of Lucas and Lloyd that year).robrulz5 wrote:I would take a '98 type season, we were competitive in every game and our biggest loss was only 24 points. As for '99 f*** no.filthy2 wrote:98-99'ish.
ZeroEffect wrote:98 was a breakthrough season for us, I think about it frequently and I'm really glad someone has mentioned it. We where never in the hunt for a flag but played consistently good footy week in week out. If we can play anything like we did that year I would be wrapped (probably helped that we unearthed a couple of talents by the names of Lucas and Lloyd that year).robrulz5 wrote:I would take a '98 type season, we were competitive in every game and our biggest loss was only 24 points. As for '99 f*** no.filthy2 wrote:98-99'ish.
He'd have to kick about 120 goals!Windy_Hill wrote:ZeroEffect wrote:98 was a breakthrough season for us, I think about it frequently and I'm really glad someone has mentioned it. We where never in the hunt for a flag but played consistently good footy week in week out. If we can play anything like we did that year I would be wrapped (probably helped that we unearthed a couple of talents by the names of Lucas and Lloyd that year).robrulz5 wrote:I would take a '98 type season, we were competitive in every game and our biggest loss was only 24 points. As for '99 f*** no.filthy2 wrote:98-99'ish.
I expect Hurley will make much the same mark on the comp as Lloyd and Lucas did in 98