No PSD for Aker
- j-mac31
- Essendon Legend
- Posts: 15233
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 2:13 pm
- Location: The city of brotherly love (Detroit)
No PSD for Aker
I'm not sure if the possibility of getting Akermanis in the pre-season draft has been floated, but it won't work, a trade must be done to get him from Brisbane.
He still has a year to go on his contract and Olarenshaw said that if a trade wasn't agreed upon, he would stay.
Matthews also said that Akermanis might stay next year.
He still has a year to go on his contract and Olarenshaw said that if a trade wasn't agreed upon, he would stay.
Matthews also said that Akermanis might stay next year.
Aaron Francis is the Messiah.
Re: No PSD for Aker
And the process begins...this reeks of setting the scene for Brisbane and Akermanis gouging as much as possible out of potential suitors.j-mac wrote:I'm not sure if the possibility of getting Akermanis in the pre-season draft has been floated, but it won't work, a trade must be done to get him from Brisbane.
He still has a year to go on his contract and Olarenshaw said that if a trade wasn't agreed upon, he would stay.
Matthews also said that Akermanis might stay next year.
"You can quote me on this... He is gawn" - bomberdonnie re Hurley's contract status 25 February 2012
Look, there's no doubt that Akermanis is a great player and would make a great addition to most sides, but Brisbane have to be realistic, they are not going to get the world for him.
If Essendon could trade two players for him that would be, in my opinion, the best outcome because therefore it frees up a bit of room on the list to be fully involved in this superstar draft and Essendon have the extra picks in the first round to use. If that dosen't eventuate, then the question must be asked, is he worth giving up a first round pick for.
Mabye the bonus priority pick and a player, but nothing more than that
If Essendon could trade two players for him that would be, in my opinion, the best outcome because therefore it frees up a bit of room on the list to be fully involved in this superstar draft and Essendon have the extra picks in the first round to use. If that dosen't eventuate, then the question must be asked, is he worth giving up a first round pick for.
Mabye the bonus priority pick and a player, but nothing more than that
- Windy_Hill
- Champion of Essendon
- Posts: 12859
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:23 pm
-
- Top Up Player
- Posts: 59
- Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 4:10 pm
- Location: Tamworth
I think Brisbane will want to do a trade. If Mathews won't trade him, Acka would continue to destabilise their playing group because he would want out. Mathews knows this & will trade him (hopefully to us). Initially when word first got out about Acka coming to us, I was against it. But the more I have thought about it, the more I like the idea - but not for our draft picks.
dom_105 wrote:Look, there's no doubt that Akermanis is a great player and would make a great addition to most sides, but Brisbane have to be realistic, they are not going to get the world for him.
If Essendon could trade two players for him that would be, in my opinion, the best outcome because therefore it frees up a bit of room on the list to be fully involved in this superstar draft and Essendon have the extra picks in the first round to use. If that dosen't eventuate, then the question must be asked, is he worth giving up a first round pick for.
Mabye the bonus priority pick and a player, but nothing more than that
Dom, I don't know what you're smoking, but you're seriously over rating the value of Aker. He's 30. He's got 3 years left. 4 at best. And the next two will be his best years.
Counting a loss of some games due to injury over that time, that means he could play around 55 or 60 games total.
In this draft, if our first three picks don't get us 200+ game players, I'll eat my shorts man.
If they want any one of our first three picks, they'll have to fork out something way better than just aker.
Don't forget that we already have a young bunch of pretty fine players who'll all be competiting with him for the sort of position and roles that he'd be playing.
I also believe that it would take a little bit of time for him to get his mojo back, after this season's lack of games.
And while there might seem to be a bidding frenzy, the Melbourne clubs are all understanding that Brisbane are committed to getting rid of him. From Brisbane's point of view, anything they get is a bonus, cause it means they're not having to pay him out this season.
- Windy_Hill
- Champion of Essendon
- Posts: 12859
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:23 pm
The bidding war has begun with the Bulldogs upping the ante for Aka.
I say he is worth no more than Pick 20 and 350K-400K per annum.
Anything beyond that I would baulk at. Would prefer to look at Spida's value to the side that could do with a similar injection that John Barnes delivered to the side.
I say he is worth no more than Pick 20 and 350K-400K per annum.
Anything beyond that I would baulk at. Would prefer to look at Spida's value to the side that could do with a similar injection that John Barnes delivered to the side.