Paddy and NAB Rising Star.
- bomberdonnie
- Champion of Essendon
- Posts: 8575
- Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 7:25 pm
- Location: Old Hobart Town
- rama_fan
- Champion of Essendon
- Posts: 11383
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 5:17 pm
- Location: World's Most Liveable City
Scott Pendlebury averages-
19.5 possession per game (62% contested)
6.2 Marks per game (17% contested)
3 Tackles per game
9 goals in 8 games
Paddy Ryder averages -
11.4 possessions per game (27% contested)
5.25 Marks per game (22% contested)
2.75 tackles per game
4.25 hitouts per game
2 goals in 8 games
It'd be a split vote decision I reckon at this stage, Pendlebury is absolutely all class and so far is having much better years that the guys drafted before him (Murphy, Ellis, Thomas, Kennedy)
Paddy's been fantastic but has often played loose down back where as Pendlebury has often been given "run with" or tagging roles with the likes of Judd, West and Stants.
I'm still leaning towards Pendlebury just - but it is only round 8.
As long as people don't get sucked into the Hype of the Tom-A-Who then I'll be happy!
19.5 possession per game (62% contested)
6.2 Marks per game (17% contested)
3 Tackles per game
9 goals in 8 games
Paddy Ryder averages -
11.4 possessions per game (27% contested)
5.25 Marks per game (22% contested)
2.75 tackles per game
4.25 hitouts per game
2 goals in 8 games
It'd be a split vote decision I reckon at this stage, Pendlebury is absolutely all class and so far is having much better years that the guys drafted before him (Murphy, Ellis, Thomas, Kennedy)
Paddy's been fantastic but has often played loose down back where as Pendlebury has often been given "run with" or tagging roles with the likes of Judd, West and Stants.
I'm still leaning towards Pendlebury just - but it is only round 8.
As long as people don't get sucked into the Hype of the Tom-A-Who then I'll be happy!
- Doctor Fish
- Regular Senior Player
- Posts: 1449
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:30 am
-
- High Draft Pick
- Posts: 652
- Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 2:42 am
I don't really care who they award it to. Paddy Ryder is the best young talent in the competition by a mile. There are no other 19 year olds in the competition that you'd even contemplate switching between CHB, CHF and the ruck during one game.
He is a freak.
Pendlebury and Selwood are fantastic young players but they've nowhere near the potential.
He is a freak.
Pendlebury and Selwood are fantastic young players but they've nowhere near the potential.
-
- High Draft Pick
- Posts: 652
- Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 2:42 am
- j-mac31
- Essendon Legend
- Posts: 15233
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 2:13 pm
- Location: The city of brotherly love (Detroit)
Stats don;'t tell the whole story though. Pendelbury plays through the middle, probably on no-one. Ryder plays in defence whee he has to man up and in the ruck, very hard for a young guy.rama_fan wrote:Scott Pendlebury averages-
19.5 possession per game (62% contested)
6.2 Marks per game (17% contested)
3 Tackles per game
9 goals in 8 games
Paddy Ryder averages -
11.4 possessions per game (27% contested)
5.25 Marks per game (22% contested)
2.75 tackles per game
4.25 hitouts per game
2 goals in 8 games
It'd be a split vote decision I reckon at this stage, Pendlebury is absolutely all class and so far is having much better years that the guys drafted before him (Murphy, Ellis, Thomas, Kennedy)
Paddy's been fantastic but has often played loose down back where as Pendlebury has often been given "run with" or tagging roles with the likes of Judd, West and Stants.
I'm still leaning towards Pendlebury just - but it is only round 8.
As long as people don't get sucked into the Hype of the Tom-A-Who then I'll be happy!
Aaron Francis is the Messiah.