Judd - eye gouging?

BenDoolan · Post by **BenDoolan** » Mon May 28, 2007 6:52 pm

Not really. They'll challenge and they'll win.

Rossoneri · Post by **Rossoneri** » Mon May 28, 2007 6:58 pm

Rules for some, not all.

F111 · Post by **F111** » Mon May 28, 2007 9:03 pm

Just great!

Kerr and Judd both come back against us, all afresh after some time off.

Boyler_Room · Post by **Boyler_Room** » Mon May 28, 2007 9:08 pm

Perfect isn't it?

bombers_rock · Post by **bombers_rock** » Mon May 28, 2007 9:51 pm

Convenient.

Rossoneri · Post by **Rossoneri** » Tue May 29, 2007 6:30 pm

Judd beats the charge.

Not surprising!

Boyler_Room · Post by **Boyler_Room** » Tue May 29, 2007 6:51 pm

Cleared.

He says he touched his face but it was above the eye and on the cheek.

Somehow someone must have tampered with the "live" video footage to make it look like it was Brown's eye.

Rossoneri · Post by **Rossoneri** » Tue May 29, 2007 7:04 pm

Must have been the martians.

Boyler_Room · Post by **Boyler_Room** » Tue May 29, 2007 7:16 pm

In conjunction with those pesky seagulls

Ramanama · Post by **Ramanama** » Tue May 29, 2007 9:30 pm

Brown said his thumb was in his mouth! WTF! His little finger was in his eye? Everyone saw it. Then Brown said he laughed after the incident and tried to get a free kick pretending that it really hurt him.

Cant believe this!

If it was any team and player from victoria they would be gone for an easy 2-5 weeks. Just think if Carr or J.Brown did it. Up too 7 for them guys.

This is a disgrace.

nomolos · Post by **nomolos** » Tue May 29, 2007 10:59 pm

Ramanama wrote:
If it was any team and player from victoria they would be gone for an easy 2-5 weeks. Just think if Carr or J.Brown did it. Up too 7 for them guys.

.

Yes cause they are serial offenders, brown not so much anymore.

But Carr is just a little turd.

tom9779 · Post by **tom9779** » Wed May 30, 2007 10:29 am

judd is pretty lucky.

looked bad on the telly, i can only think that the tribunal all have a couple of hundred on juddy for the brownlow.

i can't imagine many players getting off on that.

Boyler_Room · Post by **Boyler_Room** » Wed May 30, 2007 11:10 am

tom9779 wrote:judd is pretty lucky.

looked bad on the telly, i can only think that the tribunal all have a couple of hundred on juddy for the brownlow.

i can't imagine many players getting off on that.

Out of curiosity, if a player becomes ineligible for the brownlow is the money refunded to the punters or is that counted as a lost bet? Just wondering if it was the equivalient of a horse being scratched

BenDoolan · Post by **BenDoolan** » Wed May 30, 2007 11:20 am

tom9779 wrote:judd is pretty lucky.

looked bad on the telly, i can only think that the tribunal all have a couple of hundred on juddy for the brownlow.

i can't imagine many players getting off on that.

Yeah, I was wondering the exact same thing myself. Who's to say betting doesn't go on with those behind the scenes in the tribunal and even the umpiring department for that matter....

bomberdonnie · Post by **bomberdonnie** » Wed May 30, 2007 11:29 am

Boyler_Room wrote:
tom9779 wrote:judd is pretty lucky.

looked bad on the telly, i can only think that the tribunal all have a couple of hundred on juddy for the brownlow.

i can't imagine many players getting off on that.
Out of curiosity, if a player becomes ineligible for the brownlow is the money refunded to the punters or is that counted as a lost bet? Just wondering if it was the equivalient of a horse being scratched

Bets stand

Just like long term horse markets or Ante post as they are commonly called

If you backed Kerr or Goodes this year you are out of pocket...