I don'tknow. I jsut wanted Knights to be more active. That doesn't mean making done deals, but at least TRYING to get something for them. Espicially considering, we are looking to a future without them anyway. Knights made it clear, that from round one our young players would be getting games. Almost guarantee's those guys will be playing VFL.keri wrote:There would have been no point shopping JJ around, and as for Peverill, he shouldn't be shopped around at all. Matter of opinion of course, but even if we did want him gone, what we have gotten for him?Essendon4eva wrote:Peverill. Jason Johnson. We might not have got anything for them, but I would have liked to have heard they were being shopped around.
So far so good...
-
- High Draft Pick
- Posts: 868
- Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 4:37 pm
How do you know he hasnt?Essendon4eva wrote:I don'tknow. I jsut wanted Knights to be more active. That doesn't mean making done deals, but at least TRYING to get something for them. Espicially considering, we are looking to a future without them anyway. Knights made it clear, that from round one our young players would be getting games. Almost guarantee's those guys will be playing VFL.keri wrote:There would have been no point shopping JJ around, and as for Peverill, he shouldn't be shopped around at all. Matter of opinion of course, but even if we did want him gone, what we have gotten for him?Essendon4eva wrote:Peverill. Jason Johnson. We might not have got anything for them, but I would have liked to have heard they were being shopped around.
We have tried to get Brennan, tried to unload Cole, Dyson and Bradley.
- keri
- Regular Senior Player
- Posts: 1228
- Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 6:38 pm
- Location: Wagga Wagga
- Contact:
You want him to be active in trade week for the sake of it? Even if he isn't willing to give away picks for players, and the players we would consider giving away are not worth picks?Essendon4eva wrote:I don'tknow. I jsut wanted Knights to be more active. That doesn't mean making done deals, but at least TRYING to get something for them. Espicially considering, we are looking to a future without them anyway. Knights made it clear, that from round one our young players would be getting games. Almost guarantee's those guys will be playing VFL.keri wrote:There would have been no point shopping JJ around, and as for Peverill, he shouldn't be shopped around at all. Matter of opinion of course, but even if we did want him gone, what we have gotten for him?Essendon4eva wrote:Peverill. Jason Johnson. We might not have got anything for them, but I would have liked to have heard they were being shopped around.
Can you explain what in the name of arse would be the point of that exercise?
"Let's face it. If I didn't exist, you'd pay someone to invent me"
-
- High Draft Pick
- Posts: 868
- Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 4:37 pm
-
- High Draft Pick
- Posts: 868
- Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 4:37 pm
-
- High Draft Pick
- Posts: 868
- Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 4:37 pm
- bomberdonnie
- Champion of Essendon
- Posts: 8575
- Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 7:25 pm
- Location: Old Hobart Town
- keri
- Regular Senior Player
- Posts: 1228
- Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 6:38 pm
- Location: Wagga Wagga
- Contact:
Here's my logic: If we could conceivably get what players we are willing to trade are worth, then we trade. Given the state of the trade this year, that isn't going to happen.
There's no point getting rid of players who do make a contribution, for example, Peverill, for players who may or may not be any good, given the state of the draft this year.
There's no point getting rid of players who do make a contribution, for example, Peverill, for players who may or may not be any good, given the state of the draft this year.
"Let's face it. If I didn't exist, you'd pay someone to invent me"
I have to say that ever since you have posted on this board, you have provided very logical, sensible posts every single time. Well said.keri wrote:Here's my logic: If we could conceivably get what players we are willing to trade are worth, then we trade. Given the state of the trade this year, that isn't going to happen.
There's no point getting rid of players who do make a contribution, for example, Peverill, for players who may or may not be any good, given the state of the draft this year.
Essendunny
Yes, I refer to her as the "anti-Essendon4eva".BenDoolan wrote:I have to say that ever since you have posted on this board, you have provided very logical, sensible posts every single time. Well said.keri wrote:Here's my logic: If we could conceivably get what players we are willing to trade are worth, then we trade. Given the state of the trade this year, that isn't going to happen.
There's no point getting rid of players who do make a contribution, for example, Peverill, for players who may or may not be any good, given the state of the draft this year.