BenDoolan wrote:I wonder if he'll put his hand out at the end of this season (his contract is up) and ask for more money. If he has any decency, he'll ask for a pay cut in his next contract (if he's fortunate enough to be offered one).
Definitely should be a heavily weighted performance based contract. Shite performance = no cash. The position he plays is just so important. Without first quality clearance in the modern game, a team can get slaughtered. Hillie finally seems to be getting it and uses his size and taps very well. Laycock is a bigger bloke with longer and higher reach and should match most ruckmen yet he seems to have no idea and he every time he goes near it fear envelops me.
At best Laycock may be a 2nd or 3rd string player. We definitely need to be looking at guys like Neagle or Bellchambers over the next few weeks, and if no joy be scouting some promise for the draft. It is times like this that a midseason draft using preseason draft players would be useful.
I watched a bit of the 1996 prelim final before today's game. I know some of you here love to bag Peter Somerville, but he was a thousand times better than Laycock.
billyduckworth wrote:I watched a bit of the 1996 prelim final before today's game. I know some of you here love to bag Peter Somerville, but he was a thousand times better than Laycock.
Agreed
I used to scream at Somervile but he is twice the ruckman than The Cockhead
billyduckworth wrote:I watched a bit of the 1996 prelim final before today's game. I know some of you here love to bag Peter Somerville, but he was a thousand times better than Laycock.
After the joke we witnessed in the first half of last nights game against Richmond, there are a few more names that I could add to my list of dislike . Luckily Laycock didnt play last night or I would have really been upset, on the other hand, the anger would have a focal point....
. Luckily Laycock didnt play last night or I would have really been upset, on the other hand, the anger would have a focal point....