Check mine ^bomberdonnie wrote:I notice that Hocking hasn't received any votes ( myself included) fair chance that he would have gotten a few from the coaches??
Judd did nothing yesterday
Votes vs Scum
Re: Votes vs Scum
Essendunny
![Image](https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTtGfLBP8vXxPdMF-_j_GH0nIyt4KhS53B5GQ&usqp=CAU)
- bomberdonnie
- Champion of Essendon
- Posts: 8575
- Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 7:25 pm
- Location: Old Hobart Town
Re: Votes vs Scum
FixedBenDoolan wrote:Check mine ^bomberdonnie wrote:I notice that Hocking hasn't received many votes ( myself included) fair chance that he would have gotten a few from the coaches??
Judd did nothing yesterday
- Mrs Mercuri
- Champion of Essendon
- Posts: 7035
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 3:12 pm
- Location: Melbourne
Re: Votes vs Scum
Watched the match today!!! What a performance!!
5- Stants
4- Crameri (pity about his goal kicking )
3- Watto
2- Hibbo
1- TB
Mentions to Hocking, Heppell, Hardingham and Davey
5- Stants
4- Crameri (pity about his goal kicking )
3- Watto
2- Hibbo
1- TB
Mentions to Hocking, Heppell, Hardingham and Davey
![Image](http://i920.photobucket.com/albums/ad45/Bombergrl00/BrendonG_zpsc3d19e1e.jpg)
Re: Votes vs Scum
5 - Stanton
4 - Bellchambers
3 - Hibberd
2 - Crameri
1 - Watson
Loved watching Belly and Hibbo's work today. The future is looking good.
4 - Bellchambers
3 - Hibberd
2 - Crameri
1 - Watson
Loved watching Belly and Hibbo's work today. The future is looking good.
My material isn't very good..Oh...and then there's the bladder problem.
Re: Votes vs Scum
And mine.BenDoolan wrote:Check mine ^bomberdonnie wrote:I notice that Hocking hasn't received any votes ( myself included) fair chance that he would have gotten a few from the coaches??
Judd did nothing yesterday
Him not getting votes is typical of how people view the game....the votes generally always go to those players who stand out which is usually midfielders or forwards who kick a bag.
That's why awards like the Crichton are a better indicator of a players value to the team than the Brownlow or all the media awards.
Hocking's shutdown on Judd was super important as Judd obviuosly has the ability to tear a game apart...he neve had that opportunity yesterday.
"You can quote me on this... He is gawn" - bomberdonnie re Hurley's contract status 25 February 2012
Re: Votes vs Scum
Hocking's ability to rise to the occasion for these tasks is exceptional. He's done a number of quality jobs on Judd now. Hocko reminds me of Shane Heard in this regard.swoodley wrote:And mine.BenDoolan wrote:Check mine ^bomberdonnie wrote:I notice that Hocking hasn't received any votes ( myself included) fair chance that he would have gotten a few from the coaches??
Judd did nothing yesterday
Him not getting votes is typical of how people view the game....the votes generally always go to those players who stand out which is usually midfielders or forwards who kick a bag.
That's why awards like the Crichton are a better indicator of a players value to the team than the Brownlow or all the media awards.
Hocking's shutdown on Judd was super important as Judd obviuosly has the ability to tear a game apart...he neve had that opportunity yesterday.
Essendunny
![Image](https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTtGfLBP8vXxPdMF-_j_GH0nIyt4KhS53B5GQ&usqp=CAU)
- j-mac31
- Essendon Legend
- Posts: 15233
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 2:13 pm
- Location: The city of brotherly love (Detroit)
Re: Votes vs Scum
In The Age, Jobe is equal first with J Selwood and Kennedy (Sydney) and Paddy is 9th. Stanton not in the top 10.F111 wrote:Stanton would have at least 6 brownlow votes wouldn't he?
Aaron Francis is the Messiah.
- little_ripper
- Club Captain
- Posts: 3816
- Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 8:46 am
- Location: At a computer screen, punching out garbage on BT.
Re: Votes vs Scum
Good votes, although re: Scum players - Betts kicked 4 and Murphy and Simpson both got about 30 touches. they were decent. Judd was quiet.(good job hocking).swoodley wrote:5. Stanton
4. Watson
3. Crameri
2. Hocking
1. Hibberd
No passengers at all and I could have given votes to a number of others.
What I liked most was that Judd, Murphy, Kreuzer, Betts, Gartlett, Gibbs and Scotland were all largely ineffective which shows what a great shut down job was done.
Stanton took 17 marks
![Shocked :shock:](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
Re: Votes vs Scum
From the "Special Mentions" dept.
Hocking
Jake
Sammy
Benny H.
Shut down that midfield something chronic!!
Hocking
Jake
Sammy
Benny H.
Shut down that midfield something chronic!!
Too far for Baker now he's on to it, now he’s got it, OPEN GOAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The Dons are in front by one point at the 8 minute mark