Page 2 of 2

Re: Votes vs Scum

Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2012 10:01 am
by BenDoolan
bomberdonnie wrote:I notice that Hocking hasn't received any votes ( myself included) fair chance that he would have gotten a few from the coaches??

Judd did nothing yesterday
Check mine ^

Re: Votes vs Scum

Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2012 10:55 am
by bomberdonnie
BenDoolan wrote:
bomberdonnie wrote:I notice that Hocking hasn't received many votes ( myself included) fair chance that he would have gotten a few from the coaches??

Judd did nothing yesterday
Check mine ^
Fixed

Re: Votes vs Scum

Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2012 12:38 pm
by Mrs Mercuri
Watched the match today!!! What a performance!!

5- Stants
4- Crameri (pity about his goal kicking )
3- Watto
2- Hibbo
1- TB

Mentions to Hocking, Heppell, Hardingham and Davey

Re: Votes vs Scum

Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2012 12:43 pm
by hop
5 - Stanton
4 - Bellchambers
3 - Hibberd
2 - Crameri
1 - Watson

Loved watching Belly and Hibbo's work today. The future is looking good.

Re: Votes vs Scum

Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2012 3:21 pm
by swoodley
BenDoolan wrote:
bomberdonnie wrote:I notice that Hocking hasn't received any votes ( myself included) fair chance that he would have gotten a few from the coaches??

Judd did nothing yesterday
Check mine ^
And mine.

Him not getting votes is typical of how people view the game....the votes generally always go to those players who stand out which is usually midfielders or forwards who kick a bag.

That's why awards like the Crichton are a better indicator of a players value to the team than the Brownlow or all the media awards.

Hocking's shutdown on Judd was super important as Judd obviuosly has the ability to tear a game apart...he neve had that opportunity yesterday.

Re: Votes vs Scum

Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2012 5:10 pm
by BenDoolan
swoodley wrote:
BenDoolan wrote:
bomberdonnie wrote:I notice that Hocking hasn't received any votes ( myself included) fair chance that he would have gotten a few from the coaches??

Judd did nothing yesterday
Check mine ^
And mine.

Him not getting votes is typical of how people view the game....the votes generally always go to those players who stand out which is usually midfielders or forwards who kick a bag.

That's why awards like the Crichton are a better indicator of a players value to the team than the Brownlow or all the media awards.

Hocking's shutdown on Judd was super important as Judd obviuosly has the ability to tear a game apart...he neve had that opportunity yesterday.
Hocking's ability to rise to the occasion for these tasks is exceptional. He's done a number of quality jobs on Judd now. Hocko reminds me of Shane Heard in this regard.

Re: Votes vs Scum

Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 2:18 pm
by j-mac31
F111 wrote:Stanton would have at least 6 brownlow votes wouldn't he?
In The Age, Jobe is equal first with J Selwood and Kennedy (Sydney) and Paddy is 9th. Stanton not in the top 10.

Re: Votes vs Scum

Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 2:28 pm
by little_ripper
swoodley wrote:5. Stanton
4. Watson
3. Crameri
2. Hocking
1. Hibberd

No passengers at all and I could have given votes to a number of others.

What I liked most was that Judd, Murphy, Kreuzer, Betts, Gartlett, Gibbs and Scotland were all largely ineffective which shows what a great shut down job was done.
Good votes, although re: Scum players - Betts kicked 4 and Murphy and Simpson both got about 30 touches. they were decent. Judd was quiet.(good job hocking).

Stanton took 17 marks :shock: I would love to know how many kms he covers in a game.(and how it measures up across the comp). Cos he pulled in 28 uncontested possies. The running man.

Re: Votes vs Scum

Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 2:29 pm
by rockhole
From the "Special Mentions" dept.

Hocking
Jake
Sammy
Benny H.

Shut down that midfield something chronic!!