Page 2 of 2

Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2006 8:14 am
by robrulz5
Megan wrote:Robrulz - no. NO shooting anyone :wink:
Could we at least send him off to Carlton? :lol:

Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2006 9:02 am
by dodgey
Daisy..1 wrote:....Can we filter dodge in here :lol:
why do I get Filtered and Robbie gets off scot free :wink:

how are you Daise :lol:

Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2006 12:59 pm
by Rossoneri
Honestly he has been ok this year.

He has had a better year than McPhee and Solomon. Both of them two should be ashamed of their efforts this year. The only difference between the to is that McPhee is younger.

Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2006 1:04 pm
by j-mac31
Very good point.

However, he hasn't been awesome. I think he's probably been closer to his normal standard than they have theirs, but the team has been awful.

Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2006 1:22 pm
by jimmyc1985
Rossoneri wrote:Honestly he has been ok this year.

He has had a better year than McPhee and Solomon. Both of them two should be ashamed of their efforts this year. The only difference between the to is that McPhee is younger.
And McPhee doesn't go out and get shitfaced after a match and intermittently exercise his discretion as to what is a team commitment and what isn't.

Yes, to those who are wondering, i have it in for Solomon in a big way.

Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2006 1:49 pm
by Madden
Rossoneri wrote:Honestly he has been ok this year.

He has had a better year than McPhee and Solomon. Both of them two should be ashamed of their efforts this year. The only difference between the to is that McPhee is younger.
The other difference is that McPhee is carrying an injury.

Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2006 4:15 pm
by robbie67
Staggy wrote:
Rossoneri wrote:Honestly he has been ok this year.

He has had a better year than McPhee and Solomon. Both of them two should be ashamed of their efforts this year. The only difference between the to is that McPhee is younger.
The other difference is that McPhee is carrying an injury.
And the second differance is that McPhee hasnt played like a pile of shit for 10 years.

Posted: Sat Sep 02, 2006 12:13 am
by robbie67
He led the team off the ground tonight. They are teasing me arent they? The EFC are f***ing with my mind.

Posted: Sat Sep 02, 2006 1:25 am
by dodgey
robbie67 wrote:He led the team off the ground tonight. They are teasing me arent they? The EFC are f***ing with my mind.
it was WELL noted in the GS.....

Posted: Sun Sep 03, 2006 12:28 am
by tonysoprano
wont be on the list next year

deep breaths robbie - and repeat to yourself "calm blue ocean" :wink:

Posted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 1:43 am
by Stealth Bomber
One of the better seasons of his career, sure. But what are we comparing it to?

If this season was the absolute best he could give, after 9 seasons and 117 games, then is his place in the side necessary? There's no potential there anymore. He's as good as he's going to get.

Sure, we'd all probably give him more slack if he'd come in drafted at #58 with no hype.

Posted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 10:27 am
by Sol
Stealth Bomber wrote:One of the better seasons of his career, sure. But what are we comparing it to?

If this season was the absolute best he could give, after 9 seasons and 117 games, then is his place in the side necessary? There's no potential there anymore. He's as good as he's going to get.

Sure, we'd all probably give him more slack if he'd come in drafted at #58 with no hype.
Not sure he would have got 10 season's performing the way he has if he was a lower draft pick. I think the fat he was a high draft pick was the reason the club persisted and hoped he'd deliver on the potential they thought he had.

Definately think his time has come and the fact that he led the team off indicates that he and the group already knew.

Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 9:53 am
by Boyler_Room
9 seasons... so is he one short of life membership with the club? I bloody well hope noone gets senitmental on me if that's the case. Trade him and get what we can for the guy.... that or delist him and pick up some talent.

Waste of a draft pick... and a #4 pick at that.

Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 10:25 am
by bombercol
Blumfield got traded after 9 seasons (just after he had signed a two year contract with us), so I don't think that type of sentiment is around.

Bolton has not been our worst player at all this year, but I think it's certain he'll be shopped around. He's also uncontracted so he can't say no this year to a trade, like he did last year, cause he might end up out on his ear trying to find a VFL club to play for.

St.Kilda are about to lose some experience, Maguire would surely be underdone come round one, if he's able to start at all. Collingwood has Wakelin getting old and a couple of boys out of favour such as Jason Cloke.

A player like Bolton might fit into a side like that for a second or third round pick.

Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 1:02 pm
by rama_fan
I would snap up a 3rd round pick for him is possible.

If not a young 21/22 year old unproven player would still be a winning situation for us.

Think of guys like Jason Gram, Sam Fisher, Jobe Watson, Cheynee Stiller...all these guys were fringe players before this year.

Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 8:44 pm
by Boyler_Room
bombercol wrote:Blumfield got traded after 9 seasons (just after he had signed a two year contract with us), so I don't think that type of sentiment is around.
Yes, but that was Blumfield. We're talking about Bolton! :P

Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 10:50 am
by cutdowninprime
Blumfield 9 seasons? I dont think so. He came to the club in 1995 i believe and was traded in 2002, thats 7 seasons.