Hooker

Talk about everything Essendon. Past, Present and Future if it's about the Bombers this is the place to be.
User avatar
robbie67
Essendon Legend
Posts: 16114
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 9:00 pm

Re: Hooker

Post by robbie67 »

Rossoneri wrote:
BenDoolan wrote:
Rossoneri wrote:Give the kid a break guys. Was pretty much our key defender last night, not exactly an easy spot to come into and play well.
Did some good things, but was just swamped. More of a forward anyway, but it doesn't hurt to teach players to play i other positions. It was the catalyst of the 84-85 teams and is still a vital part of the game today.
A break from what? He aint ready.
Wasn't directed at your comments.

He is not ready, but we have to play these kids now. We played a host of them in 1997 when Hird, Alessio etc went down and we blooded players like Caracella, Hardwick, Heffernan etc and look where that took us.

It's a disgrace that he and Magin are out there playing. It's no fault of the club. Our hand has been forced. We simply do not have enough players on AFL lists anymore. They should forget about expansion, and get increase list sizes by at least 4 players per club. Guys like Pev shouldnt be retiring, while Magin who is the size of a jockey is asked to compete against developed AFL bodies.
Rossoneri
Essendon Legend
Posts: 15243
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 9:10 pm
Location: Bundoora

Re: Hooker

Post by Rossoneri »

robbie67 wrote: It's a disgrace that he and Magin are out there playing. It's no fault of the club. Our hand has been forced. We simply do not have enough players on AFL lists anymore. They should forget about expansion, and get increase list sizes by at least 4 players per club. Guys like Pev shouldnt be retiring, while Magin who is the size of a jockey is asked to compete against developed AFL bodies.
Could not possibly agree with you more. We do not have the resources to field 16 teams, let alone 18. Our drafts are very thin, except for the odd one every 4-5 years that is rather deep. We should strip it back to 14, have 42 on the list so we can have a stronger competition to the one that is currently up.
He kicks on the left
He kicks on the riiiiiiiiigggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhttttttttttttt
That boy Hurley
Makes Riewoldt look shite!
2QIK4U
On the Rookie List
Posts: 337
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 9:58 pm

Re: Hooker

Post by 2QIK4U »

Thats way to logical - which means it will never happen.
"..computer games don't affect kids. I mean if Pacman affected our generation as kids, we'd all be running around in a darkened room, munching pills and listening to repetitive electronic music. "

Kristian Wilson, Nintendo Inc. 1989
pevfan
On the Rookie List
Posts: 364
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 9:49 pm

Re: Hooker

Post by pevfan »

I thought Hooker's effort was a magnificent one....A gold medal winning effort in fact... :D
User avatar
BERT
Champion of Essendon
Posts: 6413
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 7:27 am

Re: Hooker

Post by BERT »

robbie67 wrote:

It's a disgrace that he and Magin are out there playing. It's no fault of the club. Our hand has been forced. We simply do not have enough players on AFL lists anymore. They should forget about expansion, and get increase list sizes by at least 4 players per club. Guys like Pev shouldnt be retiring, while Magin who is the size of a jockey is asked to compete against developed AFL bodies.
Spot on Rob. Those 2 are no were near ready and Spike wasn't fit but we had no choice on Friday night.
Sismis
Champion of Essendon
Posts: 12844
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:16 am

Re: Hooker

Post by Sismis »

Why do we have a limit on players on a list? If you have a salary cap why does it matter? A rebuilding side should be able to have more players than a challenging side because their players are going to be worth less!

The rule must change.
Post Reply