Page 2 of 2

Re: Votes V Geelong

Posted: Sat Mar 27, 2010 12:14 am
by Windy_Hill
Can we set some rules here about the voting - is it 3 or 5 players that receive votes????

Re: Votes V Geelong

Posted: Sat Mar 27, 2010 12:46 am
by Gimps
andrewb wrote:
robbie67 wrote:
Gimps wrote:Maybe it's the difference between going to the game and seeing it first hand rather than watching through a camera that doesn't allow you to see everything that is going on???
You sit there with a ******* mask on your face, and red ball in your mouth. How much are you seeing?
He sees the pubes but he feels the balls on his chin. It's kind of like going to the game.
F****** hilarious and original. Must be hard for the two of you, having a long distance relationship.

Get your hand off it dip$hit, I go to every game bar a couple of interstate games every year. I've been a member for 24 years, and I'm only 28. Don't even think about telling me you know more than me or think that you have a better idea of what happened during a game because you saw it on TV. You're just another one of those tried-hard wannabe Essendon supporters that think that they know it all. You're as bad as those carnts that sit at the games with an earpiece inserted in their ear and commentating everything that is said on radio.

Re: Votes V Geelong

Posted: Sat Mar 27, 2010 12:55 am
by robbie67
Gimps wrote: Get your hand off it dip$hit, I go to every game bar a couple of interstate games every year. I've been a member for 24 years, and I'm only 28. Don't even think about telling me you know more than me or think that you have a better idea of what happened during a game because you saw it on TV. You're just another one of those tried-hard wannabe Essendon supporters that think that they know it all. You're as bad as those carnts that sit at the games with an earpiece inserted in their ear and commentating everything that is said on radio.

Wow, I thought you were amusing, and had some idea. Fact is you cant even recognise light hearted humour. You really are ******* stupid after all.

Re: Votes V Geelong

Posted: Sat Mar 27, 2010 1:36 am
by tonysoprano
5. Stants
4. Gus
3. Kyle
2. Cale
1. Tayte

Re: Votes V Geelong

Posted: Sat Mar 27, 2010 1:46 am
by Brumaz
3- Prismal
2- Pears
1- Hooker

Re: Votes V Geelong

Posted: Sat Mar 27, 2010 2:21 am
by Windy_Hill
robbie67 wrote:
Gimps wrote: Get your hand off it dip$hit, I go to every game bar a couple of interstate games every year. I've been a member for 24 years, and I'm only 28. Don't even think about telling me you know more than me or think that you have a better idea of what happened during a game because you saw it on TV. You're just another one of those tried-hard wannabe Essendon supporters that think that they know it all. You're as bad as those carnts that sit at the games with an earpiece inserted in their ear and commentating everything that is said on radio.

Wow, I thought you were amusing, and had some idea. Fact is you cant even recognise light hearted humour. You really are ******* stupid after all.

Geez Gimpy, looks like the crowd has turned on the Bastard Bard of Bombertalk

Re: Votes V Geelong

Posted: Sat Mar 27, 2010 9:12 am
by Gimps
Windy_Hill wrote:
robbie67 wrote:
Gimps wrote: Get your hand off it dip$hit, I go to every game bar a couple of interstate games every year. I've been a member for 24 years, and I'm only 28. Don't even think about telling me you know more than me or think that you have a better idea of what happened during a game because you saw it on TV. You're just another one of those tried-hard wannabe Essendon supporters that think that they know it all. You're as bad as those carnts that sit at the games with an earpiece inserted in their ear and commentating everything that is said on radio.

Wow, I thought you were amusing, and had some idea. Fact is you cant even recognise light hearted humour. You really are ******* stupid after all.

Geez Gimpy, looks like the crowd has turned on the Bastard Bard of Bombertalk
I'd hardly call Robbie69 and Andrew Maher the crowd? Plenty more to come in the future, just sit back and enjoy the ride Windy.

Re: Votes V Geelong

Posted: Sat Mar 27, 2010 10:04 am
by Crazyman
5. Stants
4. Pris
3. Zaka
2. Demps
1. Howlett

Re: Votes V Geelong

Posted: Sat Mar 27, 2010 11:06 am
by GoalSneak
5 Stanton
4 Zaharakis
3 Hooker
2 Monfries
1 Pears

Re: Votes V Geelong

Posted: Sat Mar 27, 2010 1:25 pm
by s'dreams
5. Stanton
4. Hooker
3. Pears
2. Zacha
1. Prismal

Cheers - STI

Re: Votes V Geelong

Posted: Sat Mar 27, 2010 2:04 pm
by Gimps
Filthy wrote:
GoalSneak wrote:5 Stanton
4 Zaharakis
3 Hooker
2 Monfries
1 Pears
This

Geez Gumps, you should write a book on how to piss off 99% of a board in record time.....but then again life is like a box of chocolates isn't it? :roll:
Ha ha. I'm not afraid of being controversial. It's what keeps things interesting. :wink:

Re: Votes V Geelong

Posted: Sat Mar 27, 2010 2:15 pm
by boncer34
5. Stants
4. Prismall
3. Zaka
2. Hooker
1. Pears

Re: Votes V Geelong

Posted: Sat Mar 27, 2010 2:16 pm
by robbie67
Gimps wrote:[
Ha ha. I'm not afraid of being controversial. It's what keeps things interesting. :wink:
You're more like a guest on Springer. Being dumb doesnt make you controversial, like being a retard doesnt make you eccentric.

Re: Votes V Geelong

Posted: Sat Mar 27, 2010 3:05 pm
by billyduckworth
5. Hooker
4. Pears
(These two are really coming along very nicely, thank you. Pity the same can't be said for our KPP on the forward line)
3. Zaharakis (see comment above - little Zaha was probably our best forward with Monfries)
2. Stanton
1. Howlett (very impressive debut)

others worthy of mention: Watson (showed good leadership and kicked crucial goals), Hille (pity about the report but we certainly look a better team with him back), Monfries (presented well), Prismall (got plenty of possies)

Re: Votes V Geelong

Posted: Sat Mar 27, 2010 5:10 pm
by Rossoneri
3 Stanton
2. Pears
1. Prismall

Zaharakis played well also. Thought Winderlich was quite ordinary at best, need more out of him.

Re: Votes V Geelong

Posted: Sat Mar 27, 2010 5:21 pm
by j-mac31
3. Stanton
2. Prismall
1. Hooker

Re: Votes V Geelong

Posted: Mon Mar 29, 2010 11:07 am
by hop
Windy_Hill wrote:Can we set some rules here about the voting - is it 3 or 5 players that receive votes????
No - let's be non-conformist!

My Votes:
19 - Stanton
14 - Prismal
10 - Hooker
9 - Zaharakis
6 - Pears
3 - Howlett
2 - Monfries