and you would probably add Reimers and Hooker to the best 22 (i am pretty sure both are under 50 games)saladin wrote:Players from last night with under 50 games played;
atko, jetta, myers, gumby, hurley, pears, lonergan, prismall, howlett, hocking, dempsey, davey, zaka
13 players of 22. 60% of the side were football babies.
doggies had 4.
and if fit, melksham was a certainty. with colyer a fringe.
massive cause for optimism heading forward.
Analyse This
- Windy_Hill
- Champion of Essendon
- Posts: 12859
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:23 pm
Re: Analyse This
Re: Analyse This
yep, reimers and hooker both should be in our best 22. but i guess at some point the under 50 gamers start replacing other under-50 gamers. i cannot see, for example, us willingly putting a side on the field with 18 under-50 game players.
But it is illustrative of the sheer depth of talent we have assembled to come through together. the dark ages of 2000-2005 recruiting is finally being erased.
But it is illustrative of the sheer depth of talent we have assembled to come through together. the dark ages of 2000-2005 recruiting is finally being erased.