Page 2 of 2

Re: Hooker is a bum

Posted: Sun May 02, 2010 11:37 am
by Jazz_84
i was happy with hooker, my only concern was he let him get in front a bit too far on a few occasions

anyone that thinks Zaka had a bad game is dead set kidding themselves!!!

Re: Hooker is a bum

Posted: Sun May 02, 2010 12:09 pm
by BenDoolan
Jazz_84 wrote:
anyone that thinks Zaka had a bad game is dead set kidding themselves!!!
Yes, this is the other comment that should win awards...
Id also be giving zaharakis a spell next week...missed goals...and nothing else meaningful to keep him in the team
He's only our leading goal kicker this season, so lets dump him. True that he has missed easy goals, but if he nails them, he would be leading our goal kicking by even more.

Re: Hooker is a bum

Posted: Sun May 02, 2010 12:13 pm
by Mrs Mercuri
I thought Hooker did a pretty good job on Buddy last night. 5 goals against instead of 8 or 9 is a pretty good effort and it allowed Fletch to completely towel up Roughie!!

Re: Hooker is a bum

Posted: Sun May 02, 2010 12:16 pm
by Rossoneri
Who said drop Zaharakis? The kid is playing well at the moment, just can't seem to kick goals from set shots. Runs hard up the ground and for his size is an extremely good mark overhead, kind of reminds me of Mark Mercuri.

Needs to nail the set shots from 30-40m out though to really stamp himself and give him alot more confidence.

Re: Hooker is a bum

Posted: Sun May 02, 2010 12:37 pm
by keri
The best passage of play I reckon I've seen all year was Buddy getting hands to ball twice and getting taken down quick-smart by Hooker within a thirty second passage of play. He tried his guts out.

Sometimes it's not a defender playing badly, but a forward playing well. No sane opposition supporter would have called their defender a "bum" when Lloydy kicked a bag on him.

Re: Hooker is a bum

Posted: Sun May 02, 2010 12:44 pm
by rockhole
swoodley wrote:
bomberflyer wrote:Absolute bum of a footballer and weve got sucked in from last year. Id prefer Thomas Murphy Wallsy!!!
You are a moron...Hooker played on their best player and kept him relatively quiet. Franklin got 2-3 of his goals from soft umpiring decisions but had little overall impact. Hooker kept to his guns all night and ended up taking Franklin out of the contest.
.
I still have "OH Shit" moments with Hooks, but the raw commitment the guy shows together with improving levels of skill have convinced me that he will be a good, solid backman. You just cannot find blokes of this height who are mobile and quick on trees. I used to think that same of Kevin Walsh and he ended up with a Victorian jumper.

Re: Hooker is a bum

Posted: Sun May 02, 2010 12:52 pm
by Windy_Hill
rockhole wrote:
swoodley wrote:
bomberflyer wrote:Absolute bum of a footballer and weve got sucked in from last year. Id prefer Thomas Murphy Wallsy!!!
You are a moron...Hooker played on their best player and kept him relatively quiet. Franklin got 2-3 of his goals from soft umpiring decisions but had little overall impact. Hooker kept to his guns all night and ended up taking Franklin out of the contest.
.
I still have "OH Shit" moments with Hooks, but the raw commitment the guy shows together with improving levels of skill have convinced me that he will be a good, solid backman. You just cannot find blokes of this height who are mobile and quick on trees. I used to think that same of Kevin Walsh and he ended up with a Victorian jumper.

He's better than Spitfire already Rock - just needs the handlebar mo and he'll be perfect :D

Re: Hooker is a bum

Posted: Sun May 02, 2010 1:24 pm
by Doctor Fish
Rubbish post of the worst kind...

Re: Hooker is a bum

Posted: Wed May 05, 2010 2:58 pm
by j-mac31
rockhole wrote:I used to think that same of Kevin Walsh and he ended up with a Victorian jumper.
Often as first ruck if what I've been told is correct.

Remind me who was the Vics' coach. :lol:

Re: Hooker is a bum

Posted: Sat May 08, 2010 10:33 am
by saladin
bomberflyer wrote:Id also be giving zaharakis a spell next week...missed goals...and nothing else meaningful to keep him in the team.

the interesting thing about this thread is that it shows that the great choice to follow essendon is not necessarily indicative of an intelligent person.

Re: Hooker is a bum

Posted: Sat May 08, 2010 5:17 pm
by boncer34
Fantastic Post :oops: :oops:

Re: Hooker is a bum

Posted: Sat May 08, 2010 5:28 pm
by Windy_Hill
the guy who posted this hasnt shown his face since. I would imagine severe embarassment has kept him from coming nack to Bombertalk.

I say all is forgiven. We all say stupid things from time to time (well, all the time if you are Gimps) so please come back!?

Re: Hooker is a bum

Posted: Sat May 08, 2010 5:32 pm
by boncer34
Windy_Hill wrote:the guy who posted this hasnt shown his face since. I would imagine severe embarassment has kept him from coming nack to Bombertalk.

I say all is forgiven. We all say stupid things from time to time (well, all the time if you are Gimps) so please come back!?
Think the bloke was an opposition troll personally.

Re: Hooker is a bum

Posted: Sat May 08, 2010 5:34 pm
by Windy_Hill
boncer34 wrote:
Windy_Hill wrote:the guy who posted this hasnt shown his face since. I would imagine severe embarassment has kept him from coming nack to Bombertalk.

I say all is forgiven. We all say stupid things from time to time (well, all the time if you are Gimps) so please come back!?
Think the bloke was an opposition troll personally.
168 Posts - thats a committed troll.

Re: Hooker is a bum

Posted: Sat May 08, 2010 5:39 pm
by boncer34
Hahaha. Didn't look at that part, just read the tripe in this thread.