Page 2 of 2

Re: The Case for the Prosecution.

Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 8:55 pm
by Windy_Hill
robrulz5 wrote:One thing that really annoys me is whenever there is a camera on him while he is in the coaches box he is always just sitting there looking stunned. Most other coaches never stop talking, they're always communicating with the bench and their assistant coaches.

For those who missed it, here is Matthew Knights in the coached box just before half-time today











Image

Re: The Case for the Prosecution.

Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 11:31 pm
by pevfan
Either looking stunned or sharing a joke :roll: :roll:

I've said this before and I'll say it again now. As with all things in life... you get what you pay for...Case closed.

By the way, welcome back Filth and All the best with your health issue

Re: The Case for the Prosecution.

Posted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 12:44 pm
by Sismis
Windy_Hill wrote:
robrulz5 wrote:One thing that really annoys me is whenever there is a camera on him while he is in the coaches box he is always just sitting there looking stunned. Most other coaches never stop talking, they're always communicating with the bench and their assistant coaches.

For those who missed it, here is Matthew Knights in the coached box just before half-time today











Image
Yeah that's right, we did NOTHING after half time did we?

Re: The Case for the Prosecution.

Posted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 12:51 pm
by robbie67
NOTHING is exactly what we did after half time. Which was an improvement, because until half time, we had done less than NOTHING.

Re: The Case for the Prosecution.

Posted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 12:55 pm
by Sismis
robbie67 wrote:NOTHING is exactly what we did after half time. Which was an improvement, because until half time, we had done less than NOTHING.
We got back to within 2 goals.

Re: The Case for the Prosecution.

Posted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 12:57 pm
by robbie67
Well that's it then. 15 minutes of football out of 120 against Melbourne. We cant ask for much more these days.

Re: The Case for the Prosecution.

Posted: Mon Jul 12, 2010 1:30 pm
by Ossie
Sismis wrote:
robbie67 wrote:NOTHING is exactly what we did after half time. Which was an improvement, because until half time, we had done less than NOTHING.
We got back to within 2 goals.
We kicked three in a row, made a contest of it, then once they got a couple of cheap ones we stopped again.
They then kicked 8 of the next 10 or something like that (the margin was 51 early in the last term) and we got a few in junk time.
It might as well have been 'nothing'.