Lloydy REPORTED!

Talk about everything Essendon. Past, Present and Future if it's about the Bombers this is the place to be.
User avatar
Jazz_84
Essendon Legend
Posts: 16234
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 9:20 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by Jazz_84 »

honestly the tribunal has been letting people off for much worse all year long..... why is it just our guns that get nailed???
User avatar
ealesy
Champion of Essendon
Posts: 5580
Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 8:19 pm

Post by ealesy »

Makes you wonder.

I mean Andrew Welsh makes head high contact, something the AFL made a big song and dance about stamping out, cops one week which is downgraded reprimand.

Leo Barry smacks Cameron Ling in the head while he had it over the ball and doesn't even get f****** sited.

Lloyd reacts to a bullshit cheap shot from Carrol and gets offered a week, while Carrol does not even get looked at.

Bloody joke.

Thought this system was meant to stamp out the inconsistencies involved with the old system. Bring back the old system I say, hell of a lot more consistent than this bullshite match review panel crap.

Well done Anderson and Demetriou, you stole a system that works well in the NRL and royally f***** it up you stupid knob jockeys.
User avatar
Jazz_84
Essendon Legend
Posts: 16234
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 9:20 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by Jazz_84 »

"The panel looked at contact between Hawthorn's Campbell Brown and Collingwood's Dane Swan from the fourth quarter of Sunday's game but due to the video evidence was inconclusive"

that was thrown out..... i heard there isn't any video footage of lloydy's incident either?? has to be thrown out in that case, just has to be, if its not then i suspect serious conspiracy
User avatar
jimmyc1985
Champion of Essendon
Posts: 5869
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: Position A

Post by jimmyc1985 »

Footage of the Lloyd incident below. Make up your own minds:

http://video2.foxsports.com.au/video.ph ... 52&id=3429
User avatar
dingus
Regular Senior Player
Posts: 2374
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 9:12 pm
Location: Adelaide. Your beer is worse than my beer.

Post by dingus »

Surely they jest?
User avatar
Madden
Club Captain
Posts: 3840
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:15 pm

Post by Madden »

They have footage. He'll get the week. I think we have no chance of getting him off.

It was assessed as low contact (lowest standard) body contact (lowest standard) and intentional. We can't get him off on that - it was clearly intentional.

Only chance we can get him off is if we can convince the Melb bloke to testify that he took a dive. Only chance.
dom_105
Club Captain
Posts: 4712
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 1:32 pm
Location: Eastern Suburbs

Post by dom_105 »

They will try and get it downgraded to reckless.

That will get him under the 100 points.
User avatar
jimmyc1985
Champion of Essendon
Posts: 5869
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: Position A

Post by jimmyc1985 »

Staggy wrote:They have footage. He'll get the week. I think we have no chance of getting him off.

It was assessed as low contact (lowest standard) body contact (lowest standard) and intentional. We can't get him off on that - it was clearly intentional.

Only chance we can get him off is if we can convince the Melb bloke to testify that he took a dive. Only chance.
Tasmanian Dams case could also be argued.
dom_105
Club Captain
Posts: 4712
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 1:32 pm
Location: Eastern Suburbs

Post by dom_105 »

Don't forget Mabo

"It's the constitution. It's Mabo. It's just...the vibe."
User avatar
Madden
Club Captain
Posts: 3840
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:15 pm

Post by Madden »

jimmyc1985 wrote:
Staggy wrote:They have footage. He'll get the week. I think we have no chance of getting him off.

It was assessed as low contact (lowest standard) body contact (lowest standard) and intentional. We can't get him off on that - it was clearly intentional.

Only chance we can get him off is if we can convince the Melb bloke to testify that he took a dive. Only chance.
Tasmanian Dams case could also be argued.
Pfffft. As if.

Donoghue vs Stevenson, all the way....
User avatar
Madden
Club Captain
Posts: 3840
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:15 pm

Post by Madden »

dom_105 wrote:They will try and get it downgraded to reckless.

That will get him under the 100 points.
That's true, they will try, but the reality is that he charged straight at the bloke. Not in the course of play, just randomly. Its intentional.
User avatar
Jazz_84
Essendon Legend
Posts: 16234
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 9:20 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by Jazz_84 »

jimmyc1985 wrote:Footage of the Lloyd incident below. Make up your own minds:

http://video2.foxsports.com.au/video.ph ... 52&id=3429
does this take forever for anyone else???
citizenerased
On the Rookie List
Posts: 227
Joined: Mon Sep 11, 2006 1:14 pm

Post by citizenerased »

provocation? or does that only work for dessie?
The Super Nintendo formerly known as Chalmers
User avatar
Jazz_84
Essendon Legend
Posts: 16234
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 9:20 pm
Location: Melbourne

Post by Jazz_84 »

well what about carroll, why isn't he up for a week?? thats what i dont get, he did all the same things, intentional yes, low contact yes, and body contact YES
User avatar
danstar84
Club Captain
Posts: 4683
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 9:57 pm
Location: Your Nightmares

Post by danstar84 »

Why wasn't Fevola up for a week v collingwood?
canberrabomber
Top Up Player
Posts: 22
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2007 10:01 pm

Post by canberrabomber »

Staggy wrote:
dom_105 wrote:They will try and get it downgraded to reckless.

That will get him under the 100 points.
That's true, they will try, but the reality is that he charged straight at the bloke. Not in the course of play, just randomly. Its intentional.
I don't think it is simply a case of deliberately running into a player, this occurs quite often in varying degrees- he has to intentionally "charge".

Didak admitted that he deliberately ran into the back of Haselby but he was completely exonerated.

Oh and I'm quoting R v Crabbe.
uptick
High Draft Pick
Posts: 734
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 9:13 pm
Location: Under cover, deep in the heart of Carlscum territory

Post by uptick »

Jazz_84 wrote:
jimmyc1985 wrote:Footage of the Lloyd incident below. Make up your own minds:

http://video2.foxsports.com.au/video.ph ... 52&id=3429
does this take forever for anyone else???
Didn't work for me, hopefully on Bomber TV though. Do the MRP members have high security dwellings, if you get my drift. fair dinkum basketball here we come.
dom_105
Club Captain
Posts: 4712
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 1:32 pm
Location: Eastern Suburbs

Post by dom_105 »

Was Lloyd reported by an Umpire, or the MRP? I have heard conflicting statements.

If it was the umpire who reported him, I was always under the impression that an umpire had to tell the player that he was reporting him before the start of the next quarter. I know from my limited knowledge of local football, plenty of cases have been thrown out as the result of umpires informing the player after the start of the next quarter that they were indeed reported.

Just something to think about.
User avatar
robbie67
Essendon Legend
Posts: 16114
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 9:00 pm

Post by robbie67 »

It's a conspiracy.

The People V Larry Flynt.
paddyl90
Champion of Essendon
Posts: 5068
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 11:20 pm
Location: Knoxfield

Post by paddyl90 »

Typical review panel come up with a load of ****** shit.

Just watch him get a week. :evil: Bunch of fu**en c**ts they make me so angry.
Post Reply