Bombertalk

Posted: **Thu Aug 16, 2007 6:32 pm**

Again staying away from the opinion and picking on 'typographical errors'. That is like picking on someone's appearance during a debate.

Posted: **Thu Aug 16, 2007 6:33 pm**

i'm getting flashbacks to primary school...

"you're an idiot"

"no you are"

"takes one to know one"...

have your last word e4e, i am know officially bored with you

Posted: **Thu Aug 16, 2007 6:35 pm**

SO because you are bored with it you are the mature one? You got into a argument with me and I proved you wrong, so you resort to having a go at typo's.
Very poor.

Posted: **Thu Aug 16, 2007 6:48 pm**

Posted: **Thu Aug 16, 2007 6:52 pm**

Should have been a long time ago.

Posted: **Thu Aug 16, 2007 10:24 pm**

Essendon4eva wrote: Sheeds hasn't shown faith in young kids? Since Hird has been out who has been givne the reigns in the middle? Watson.

Sure bout that?

Posted: **Fri Aug 17, 2007 11:22 am**

What? He hasn't played every game? He has been in the middle constantly? Get your head out of the sand.

Posted: **Fri Aug 17, 2007 3:52 pm**

Essendon4eva wrote:What? He hasn't played every game? He has been in the middle constantly? Get your head out of the sand.

Same could be said for Peverill. He has played every game and has played all his time in the middle. And he has probably spent more time on the ground too.

Posted: **Fri Aug 17, 2007 4:03 pm**

Essendon4eva wrote:Should have locked me up a long time ago.

For a change, I couldnt agree with you more.

Posted: **Fri Aug 17, 2007 8:54 pm**

Essendon4eva wrote:What? He hasn't played every game? He has been in the middle constantly? Get your head out of the sand.

When your finished have cracks at me take a look at the team selection.

Posted: **Fri Aug 17, 2007 9:00 pm**

And boncer, we dominated the hit-outs but got killed in the clearances. Not acceptable play from the boys in the middle. ALso he got dropped for one game so it means you are right that Sheeds doesn't gives kids a chance. You are dillusional buddy.

Posted: **Fri Aug 17, 2007 9:04 pm**

Essendon4eva wrote:And boncer, we dominated the hit-outs but got killed in the clearances. Not acceptable play from the boys in the middle. ALso he got dropped for one game so it means you are right that Sheeds doesn't gives kids a chance. You are dillusional buddy.

Nope not dillusional. Just find it odd that he's dropped the bloke that he "gave the reigns" to in the middle.

Posted: **Fri Aug 17, 2007 9:10 pm**

He did. You do know 'did' is past tense. SO he has given him the reigns, but obviously has reason to drop him. However, if Hird doesn't come up I'm sure Watson will be straight back into the line-up.

Posted: **Fri Aug 17, 2007 9:13 pm**

U have become the Peter Hore of these boards E4E!

Posted: **Fri Aug 17, 2007 9:13 pm**

Essendon4eva wrote:He did. You do know 'did' is past tense. SO he has given him the reigns, but obviously has reason to drop him. However, if Hird doesn't come up I'm sure Watson will be straight back into the line-up.

Thats whats really got me confused with Sheeds. Watson seems to have stood up in the last couple of weeks.

Posted: **Fri Aug 17, 2007 9:44 pm**

Essendon4eva wrote:You are such a twit. What did I say? Our best is better than the three bottom teams. However what I added was that if one team doesn't bring their best anda nother does they can get knocked off. What is so hard to understand about that?

If you'r belief is that win's and losses is what makes a team good or bad, good luuck trying to rank the teams. Geelong is on top, but the Kangas beat them. Are the Kangaroo's better than Geelong? Under your theory they are.

At the moment we are playing the worst, but we have seen our best and it is 10 times better than what we have shown. THAT is the point I've made.

Lolz don't worry bout these other clowns E4E, we no what you mean!

"Robbie67" is a SOB, ROFL!! Probly had a bad day at work Lolz!

Posted: **Fri Aug 17, 2007 10:17 pm**

Locked!

no point encouraging this guys...

thank you

Bombertalk

PJ in strife.