Page 3 of 4

Re: Gumby

Posted: Sat Mar 27, 2010 9:47 am
by Crazyman
gringo wrote:He was an unmitigated disaster tonight. But he got through unscathed. Give him two months in the seniors regardless of firm though. That's time to prove himself. Personally I reckon he'll come good.
Ok, where is gringo and what have you done with him?? hahahahaha

I personally agree that he should be given time to find his feet, but 2 months is a bit long for mine to keep persisting unless all our other forwards are out...

Re: Gumby

Posted: Sat Mar 27, 2010 12:00 pm
by jimmyc1985
Yes, was not good. In fact, was very ordinary.

Key forwards have a few ways they can beat their opponents in marking contests:
(1) be really quick off the mark and get space on the lead (Fevola is the best in the comp at this);
(2) be too tall and outmark them overhead (Franklin; Riewoldt);
(3) too strong such that you beat the defender in a wrestle (Brown; previously Tredrea);
(4) be super fit and just burn your defender off (Riewoldt, Brown again).

Gumby doesn't look to have the speed off the mark (i can't recall a single time where he put any space between himself and the defender), so option (1) looks unlikely; he's not strong (yet) so option (3) doesn't apply; and he's not fit enough yet for option (4) to apply. However, he is bloody tall so should be looking to outmark opponents overhead when possible. Last night he didn't show the strong hands that are required to pull in the overhead marks under pressure, even though he probably had 4-5 inches in reach advantage over Lonergan. Hopefully he develops this with practice and with the passage of time. Then, as he strings more games/seasons together, he can add options (4) and maybe (3) to his game.

In spite of what you may say about Gumbleton, he was less disappointing for mine than Neagle. Neagle has been inching his way towards my "time waster" category for a while now, and will be there soon unless things improve.

Re: Gumby

Posted: Sat Mar 27, 2010 2:21 pm
by Gimps
Contrary to what some individuals thought last night, I think Gumby deserves his chance and will rightly get it. I've had very similar injuries to him over the past 11 years, so of all people, I feel for him and know what he is going through. Only difference is, football was not how I made a living.

For those who say we should just leave him in for the first 10-12 rounds, I think that is ludicrous. He needs to improve, and if this doesn't happen within the first 4-5 weeks, he needs to go back to the 2's. Why should the team carry him? And why should someone else miss out that deserves a spot?

I've got my fingers crossed as much as anyone else out there, but we have to be realistic.

Re: Gumby

Posted: Sat Mar 27, 2010 2:29 pm
by robbie67
Gimps wrote:I've had very similar injuries to him over the past 11 years, so of all people, I feel for him and know what he is going through. Only difference is, football was not how I made a living.

Please tell us Gimps, how did this effect your ability to bend over and take it in the pooh pooh parlour. Did it have a major influence on the gimp you have become?

Re: Gumby

Posted: Sat Mar 27, 2010 2:47 pm
by Gimps
robbie67 wrote:
Gimps wrote:I've had very similar injuries to him over the past 11 years, so of all people, I feel for him and know what he is going through. Only difference is, football was not how I made a living.

Please tell us Gimps, how did this effect your ability to bend over and take it in the pooh pooh parlour. Did it have a major influence on the gimp you have become?
Nah, I like to do it standing up.. :wink:

Re: Gumby

Posted: Sat Mar 27, 2010 3:07 pm
by Jazz_84
Gimps wrote:
robbie67 wrote:
Gimps wrote:I've had very similar injuries to him over the past 11 years, so of all people, I feel for him and know what he is going through. Only difference is, football was not how I made a living.

Please tell us Gimps, how did this effect your ability to bend over and take it in the pooh pooh parlour. Did it have a major influence on the gimp you have become?
Nah, I like to do it standing up.. :wink:
did you loose your legs from the knee down? hahaha sorry mate just had too

Re: Gumby

Posted: Sat Mar 27, 2010 3:13 pm
by robbie67
Heather Mills stole his wooden peg. She is bringing me Paul Macartney's head on it.

Re: Gumby

Posted: Sat Mar 27, 2010 3:44 pm
by Gimps
Please tell us Gimps, how did this effect your ability to bend over and take it in the pooh pooh parlour. Did it have a major influence on the gimp you have become?[/quote]

Nah, I like to do it standing up.. :wink:[/quote]

did you loose your legs from the knee down? hahaha sorry mate just had too[/quote]

Nah, just gotta have the right technique, stand like a tripod =D>

Re: Gumby

Posted: Sat Mar 27, 2010 3:55 pm
by Madden
What a shock to log on here and find this thread.

Yes, Gumby was terrible last night. Really terrible. It goes without saying that he hasn't played any games and probably has zero confidence. He will have some absolute howlers this year, even if he is going to become a good player eventually.

He must be played every game, good form or bad. We need to work out whether he is going to make it, and quick. Because if he isn't going to make it, then we need to recruit another forward, and fast. Otherwise we will come into our premiership window with a substandard forward line.

Will he make it? I don't think anyone can really answer that. Based on exposed form and his propensity to get injured, I'm thinking the odds are about 30-70.

Re: Gumby

Posted: Sat Mar 27, 2010 6:16 pm
by j-mac31
Filthy wrote:PS Kicking action is shithouse though :(
True. But one ended in a goal and if Paddy had been hanging around for either we'd have mark of the year already. :wink:

Yes, he was shit. But give him some f****** time.

Knowing our luck if we'd drafted Selwood, he'd have had the long list of bad injuries and Gumbleton would be a triple premiership player.

Re: Gumby

Posted: Sat Mar 27, 2010 11:31 pm
by dom_105
Jesus, one bad game against the reigning premier and the world is coming to an end.

Re: Gumby

Posted: Sun Mar 28, 2010 7:59 am
by Wally
dom_105 wrote:Jesus, one bad game against the reigning premier and the world is coming to an end.
No the world is not coming to an end. With all the hype and anticipation leading into Round 1 with our new forward structure in the wake of the departures, we were let down. Yes the delivery at times was poor going into the forward line, however come Round 1 you would like to think that there was at least 1 or 2 signs that point to some optimism for the immediate future that we can grab hold of and something that you can look back on and say - "Yes we do have something there".

Not sure we can say that about anything we say Friday night with Gumby and / or Neagle ?

Hopefully that was the game they needed to have to remind them of what it takes and how hard they both need to work and they start making amends against Freo next week.

Re: Gumby

Posted: Sun Mar 28, 2010 1:51 pm
by Doctor Strangelove
I am happy to be patient with Gumby BUT what has happened to his KICKING style? He seemed to throw the ball up in the air which caused it to go ballisticy straight up in air. I thought he was good kick? :oops:

Re: Gumby

Posted: Sun Mar 28, 2010 1:53 pm
by Windy_Hill
Doctor Strangelove wrote:I am happy to be patient with Gumby BUT what has happened to his KICKING style? He seemed to throw the ball up in the air which caused it to go ballisticy straight up in air. I thought he was good kick? :oops:
Nerves - simple as that

Re: Gumby

Posted: Sun Mar 28, 2010 6:44 pm
by robrulz5
[quote="jimmyc1985"

Key forwards have a few ways they can beat their opponents in marking contests:
(1) be really quick off the mark and get space on the lead (Fevola is the best in the comp at this);
(2) be too tall and outmark them overhead (Franklin; Riewoldt);
(3) too strong such that you beat the defender in a wrestle (Brown; previously Tredrea);
(4) be super fit and just burn your defender off (Riewoldt, Brown again).

[/quote]

Apparently number 4 is what he is meant to be.

Re: Gumby

Posted: Thu Apr 01, 2010 8:25 am
by little_ripper
And as reported in the hun today. Gumby named again.
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/k ... 5848250566

Re: Gumby

Posted: Thu Apr 01, 2010 11:33 am
by Sismis
Gumby wil be given every opportunity and so he should. We are not looking for a handy forward we are looking for a superstar. He has the attributes, he has the work ethic he just needs a little bit of luck.

6th game in with such a big build up I think it was inevitable that he would struggle. He may do so for couple of weeks untill he gets confidence. This year he should be aiming for consistancy, an average of 2 goals a game would be an excellent result.

IMO opinon just needs to snag a couple to get his tail up and he will begin to be effective.

Re: Gumby

Posted: Thu Apr 01, 2010 8:23 pm
by Boyler_Room
Gumby, Neagle... both had rubbisg games. Neither of them are ready to be the key forwards... which makes me wonder what the hell was going on in Knights' head when he pushed Lloyd out the door. Irrespective, I just don't see how these boys are going to kick enough goals for us to improve on last year (which, for mine, is always the goal).

They both had pretty ordinary outings. I'm not convinced about the whole confidence thing either, to be honest, but that doesn't mean I'm calling for him to be dropped. I'm just hoping they both manage to find their feet, and do it sooner rather than later.

Re: Gumby

Posted: Sat Apr 03, 2010 1:12 pm
by j-mac31
Boyler_Room wrote:Gumby, Neagle... both had rubbisg games.
They did what? :wink:
Boyler_Room wrote:which makes me wonder what the hell was going on in Knights' head when he pushed Lloyd out the door.
1. Lloyd was mostly crap last year.
2. He wasn't going to get any better this year.
3. He would not have been around for our next Grand Final.
4. Hurley.

Re: Gumby

Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2010 5:17 pm
by robbie67
j-mac31 wrote:3. He would not have been around for our next Grand Final.
That player that will be probably still hasnt been born.

Gumby showed a lot of improvemwnt this week. About the only good sign on one of the bleakest days of what used to be a proud club.

If "THIS" is Essendon, the only thing I recognise is the guernsey.