Paddy Ryder
Re: Paddy Ryder
Player has to agree.
- little_ripper
- Club Captain
- Posts: 3816
- Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 8:46 am
- Location: At a computer screen, punching out garbage on BT.
Re: Paddy Ryder
If Player disagrees, not sure where that leaves him @ the tribunal though Sismis.
Paddy really has to accept any destination. If a deal is tabled and he is on record as refusing to take it , then thats grounds that its not about leaving Essendon because of lack of duty of care. Its just about where he wants to end up.
He knocks back GWS then that will mean he hasnt got a leg to stand on if he wants to progress with action at the tribunal.
Dodoro needs to call Connors bluff on this one.
Paddy really has to accept any destination. If a deal is tabled and he is on record as refusing to take it , then thats grounds that its not about leaving Essendon because of lack of duty of care. Its just about where he wants to end up.
He knocks back GWS then that will mean he hasnt got a leg to stand on if he wants to progress with action at the tribunal.
Dodoro needs to call Connors bluff on this one.
Re: Paddy Ryder
Deal done, but not sure what it is.
Re: Paddy Ryder
i think its 17 and cooney.
Re: Paddy Ryder
Apparently pick 17 and Cooney to us. Pick 37 to Dogs. Ryder to Port.
Re: Paddy Ryder
pick 37 I believe for Giles
Lets wait and see
Lets wait and see
Re: Paddy Ryder
Giles and Pick 62 for Pick 53stryper wrote:pick 37 I believe for Giles
Lets wait and see
Re: Paddy Ryder
sorry our other pick for Giles not sure which 1
- little_ripper
- Club Captain
- Posts: 3816
- Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 8:46 am
- Location: At a computer screen, punching out garbage on BT.
Re: Paddy Ryder
17 and 37 lodged for Paddy.Gimps wrote:Apparently pick 17 and Cooney to us. Pick 37 to Dogs. Ryder to Port.
Cannot believe GWS were not prepared to pay more.
bullshit.
Also I hope Connors has an accident just to wipe that smarmy look off his face. what a c***.
Re: Paddy Ryder
Like I said in an earlier post, I hope the c*** does a knee and has to sit out for a very long time!!
- little_ripper
- Club Captain
- Posts: 3816
- Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 8:46 am
- Location: At a computer screen, punching out garbage on BT.
Re: Paddy Ryder
Settles the draw next season too. So predictable.
Will play Port twice and if we get Cooney the dogs.
Should have sent Ryder to GWS to 'stoke the rivalry' and get them twice instead.
f*** Port.
Oh and Hallihan will turn out to be a much better option than Cooney over the next 4 years.
EFC - f****** retirement home.
So sick of the club right now.
Will play Port twice and if we get Cooney the dogs.
Should have sent Ryder to GWS to 'stoke the rivalry' and get them twice instead.
f*** Port.
Oh and Hallihan will turn out to be a much better option than Cooney over the next 4 years.
EFC - f****** retirement home.
So sick of the club right now.
Last edited by little_ripper on Thu Oct 16, 2014 11:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Paddy Ryder
Deal done for picks 17 and 37.
adios!!!
adios!!!
Re: Paddy Ryder
See ya Paddy hope you don't get any nasty warts or rashes...
It just fell out of the sky
Re: Paddy Ryder
Lets look at the deals in a whole.
Out- Ryder + 3rd rounder (which we weren't using)
In- Giles, Cooney, 1st rounder + 4th Rounder (which we aren't using)
So we've got Giles, Cooney and a first rounder for Ryder.
Sweet.
Out- Ryder + 3rd rounder (which we weren't using)
In- Giles, Cooney, 1st rounder + 4th Rounder (which we aren't using)
So we've got Giles, Cooney and a first rounder for Ryder.
Sweet.
Essendon Football Club- We arent arrogant, just deluded.
Re: Paddy Ryder
Port ahead: Ryder for 17 and 37
Dogs: 37 for Cooney, they wanted him gone so probably a breakeven
Us: Pick 17, Cooney and Giles. We're down but really not by that much. All depends on what we can get out of Cooney.
Dogs: 37 for Cooney, they wanted him gone so probably a breakeven
Us: Pick 17, Cooney and Giles. We're down but really not by that much. All depends on what we can get out of Cooney.
Re: Paddy Ryder
If we can get him to 2012 form of 25 touches and a goal for a couple of years we'll be in front.Sismis wrote:Port ahead: Ryder for 17 and 37
Dogs: 37 for Cooney, they wanted him gone so probably a breakeven
Us: Pick 17, Cooney and Giles. We're down but really not by that much. All depends on what we can get out of Cooney.
Essendon Football Club- We arent arrogant, just deluded.
- little_ripper
- Club Captain
- Posts: 3816
- Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 8:46 am
- Location: At a computer screen, punching out garbage on BT.
Re: Paddy Ryder
GWS must not have rated Ryder or just not there for a top 10 pick.boncer34 wrote:Lets look at the deals in a whole.
Out- Ryder + 3rd rounder (which we weren't using)
In- Giles, Cooney, 1st rounder + 4th Rounder (which we aren't using)
So we've got Giles, Cooney and a first rounder for Ryder.
Sweet.
Because thats what I would have shipped him for, not pick 17 and 37(ok on traded) in a weak draft
Dogs would take anything for Cooney, they need to pay Boyd and Cooney is a massive liability. Failed Medico tests at another club(Carlton...and did he pass at north?).
I guess its nice having Licha/Chapman and Cooney on the list at once. We might take a ward out at St Vincents.
Re: Paddy Ryder
Agree and if Bellchambers also gets back 2012 form we'll be well ahead.boncer34 wrote:If we can get him to 2012 form of 25 touches and a goal for a couple of years we'll be in front.Sismis wrote:Port ahead: Ryder for 17 and 37
Dogs: 37 for Cooney, they wanted him gone so probably a breakeven
Us: Pick 17, Cooney and Giles. We're down but really not by that much. All depends on what we can get out of Cooney.
Re: Paddy Ryder
Ryder had to agree to a trade to GWS. It was not going to happen.little_ripper wrote:GWS must not have rated Ryder or just not there for a top 10 pick.boncer34 wrote:Lets look at the deals in a whole.
Out- Ryder + 3rd rounder (which we weren't using)
In- Giles, Cooney, 1st rounder + 4th Rounder (which we aren't using)
So we've got Giles, Cooney and a first rounder for Ryder.
Sweet.
Because thats what I would have shipped him for, not pick 17 and 37(ok on traded) in a weak draft
Dogs would take anything for Cooney, they need to pay Boyd and Cooney is a massive liability. Failed Medico tests at another club(Carlton...and did he pass at north?).
I guess its nice having Licha/Chapman and Cooney on the list at once. We might take a ward out at St Vincents.
Cooney passed medicals here and at Arden St. I have not seen anywhere that he failed one at the Blues.