Bombertalk

robrulz5 · Post by **robrulz5** » Thu May 10, 2012 1:56 pm

Maybe to stop all the threads about players popping up we could have another sub board with a thread for each player for discussion about them.

Gimps · Post by **Gimps** » Thu May 10, 2012 2:15 pm

robrulz5 wrote:Maybe to stop all the threads about players popping up we could have another sub board with a thread for each player for discussion about them.

This.

Ossie · Post by **Ossie** » Thu May 10, 2012 2:44 pm

Gimps wrote:
robrulz5 wrote:Maybe to stop all the threads about players popping up we could have another sub board with a thread for each player for discussion about them.
This.

+1

You just know in the 8 hours after a game the top of the forum will look like this:

Dyson ...
Hooker ...
Davey ...
Umpires! ...

Gimps · Post by **Gimps** » Thu May 10, 2012 3:09 pm

The umpires thread should be pinned to the top of the board permanently..

Madden · Post by **Madden** » Thu May 10, 2012 3:44 pm

Don't think there's any reason for a sub board - if we created one, there would be very little to discuss on this board!

Let the threads about players develop organically (much like on Blitz) - artificially creating a thread for every player is unneccessary.

robbie67 · Post by **robbie67** » Thu May 10, 2012 3:48 pm

Staggy wrote:Don't think there's any reason for a sub board - if we created one, there would be very little to discuss on this board!

Let the threads about players develop organically (much like on Blitz) - artificially creating a thread for every player is unneccessary.

This.

Stop acting like Kevin Bartlett, and leave the f****** board alone.

Post by **Jazz_84** » Thu May 10, 2012 5:29 pm

yeah i doubt we'll change the board, would like a few extra people however, just mention to friends and stuff and if everyone does that we might get a couple of new people with different views

Mrs Mercuri · Post by **Mrs Mercuri** » Thu May 10, 2012 6:50 pm

Maybe some more females.....my friends know nothing about footy sadly!!

Windy Hille · Post by **Windy Hille** » Thu May 10, 2012 10:44 pm

What a hypocritical thread! The author wants new members but was directly responsible for trying to get me AXED for no good reason!

robbie67 · Post by **robbie67** » Thu May 10, 2012 10:54 pm

Mrs Mercuri wrote:Maybe some more females.....my friends know nothing about footy sadly!!

If they're hot I can teach them a thing or two...............................................maybe even something about footy.

hop · Post by **hop** » Thu May 10, 2012 11:08 pm

It always amuses me when contributors rather than creators start pontificating about what ought to happen.

I'm just thankful that this forum exists and that for a few years now I've been able to be involved. My initial stimuli was to break he habit of a lifetime - and as pathetic as it might sound - it preoccupied me when I was looking for distractions to give the fags the boot - (of the cigarette variety).

Of couse it'd be great if we could attrack 'like minded' contributors - however being a supporter of this great club is not the only prerequisite.

Athough I've spent the majorty of my adult life dismising cliques and exclusivity - this little corner of my world provides a good deal of enjoyment and anonymous camraderie.

The greatest aspect of the WWW is it's anarchy, anonimity and accessibility. Those who persevere on this site tend to gain credibility.

BT will live and die according to our relevance and need. Let's not attempt to manufacture something that doesn't and can't exist.

I came, I saw, I wasn't Bluey.
What will be - will be.

BenDoolan · Post by **BenDoolan** » Thu May 10, 2012 11:26 pm

hop wrote:It always amuses me when contributors rather than creators start pontificating about what ought to happen.

I'm just thankful that this forum exists and that for a few years now I've been able to be involved. My initial stimuli was to break he habit of a lifetime - and as pathetic as it might sound - it preoccupied me when I was looking for distractions to give the fags the boot - (of the cigarette variety).

Of couse it'd be great if we could attrack 'like minded' contributors - however being a supporter of this great club is not the only prerequisite.

Athough I've spent the majorty of my adult life dismising cliques and exclusivity - this little corner of my world provides a good deal of enjoyment and anonymous camraderie.

The greatest aspect of the WWW is it's anarchy, anonimity and accessibility. Those who persevere on this site tend to gain credibility.

BT will live and die according to our relevance and need. Let's not attempt to manufacture something that doesn't and can't exist.

I came, I saw, I wasn't Bluey.
What will be - will be.

Haha, what a great post.

I laughed at this....

it preoccupied me when I was looking for distractions to give the fags the boot - (of the cigarette variety).

Gimps · Post by **Gimps** » Thu May 10, 2012 11:30 pm

=D>

hop wrote:It always amuses me when contributors rather than creators start pontificating about what ought to happen.

I'm just thankful that this forum exists and that for a few years now I've been able to be involved. My initial stimuli was to break he habit of a lifetime - and as pathetic as it might sound - it preoccupied me when I was looking for distractions to give the fags the boot - (of the cigarette variety).

Of couse it'd be great if we could attrack 'like minded' contributors - however being a supporter of this great club is not the only prerequisite.

Athough I've spent the majorty of my adult life dismising cliques and exclusivity - this little corner of my world provides a good deal of enjoyment and anonymous camraderie.

The greatest aspect of the WWW is it's anarchy, anonimity and accessibility. Those who persevere on this site tend to gain credibility.

BT will live and die according to our relevance and need. Let's not attempt to manufacture something that doesn't and can't exist.

I came, I saw, I wasn't Bluey.
What will be - will be.

Post by **danstar84** » Fri May 11, 2012 7:23 am

I'll try to stop being a lazy bastard and contribute a few more useless posts from time to time

Windy_Hill · Post by **Windy_Hill** » Fri May 11, 2012 12:23 pm

Windy Hille wrote:What a hypocritical thread! The author wants new members but was directly responsible for trying to get me AXED for no good reason!

Huh? You still pissed over that...get over it junior

(and havent you been the find of the century since joining)

Really looking forward to your next half interesting contribution to this forum.

Pest

swoodley · Post by **swoodley** » Fri May 11, 2012 12:47 pm

Windy_Hill wrote:
Windy Hille wrote:What a hypocritical thread! The author wants new members but was directly responsible for trying to get me AXED for no good reason!

Huh? You still pissed over that...get over it junior

(and havent you been the find of the century since joining)

Really looking forward to your next half interesting contribution to this forum.

Pest

meeow...

Windy_Hill · Post by **Windy_Hill** » Fri May 11, 2012 1:28 pm

swoodley wrote:
Windy_Hill wrote:
Windy Hille wrote:What a hypocritical thread! The author wants new members but was directly responsible for trying to get me AXED for no good reason!

Huh? You still pissed over that...get over it junior

(and havent you been the find of the century since joining)

Really looking forward to your next half interesting contribution to this forum.

Pest
meeow...

C'mon Swoods, the guy wont give it a rest, havent we moved on?? I mean seriously.

Gimps · Post by **Gimps** » Fri May 11, 2012 2:15 pm

Ha ha..

I can picture Windy saying that in the voice of "Bluey" from the movie Chopper..

"That's the farkun whack!"

swoodley · Post by **swoodley** » Fri May 11, 2012 2:17 pm

Windy_Hill wrote:
swoodley wrote:
Windy_Hill wrote:
Windy Hille wrote:What a hypocritical thread! The author wants new members but was directly responsible for trying to get me AXED for no good reason!

Huh? You still pissed over that...get over it junior

(and havent you been the find of the century since joining)

Really looking forward to your next half interesting contribution to this forum.

Pest
meeow...
C'mon Swoods, the guy wont give it a rest, havent we moved on?? I mean seriously.

haha...c'mon Windy...are you sure you're over it

Windy_Hill · Post by **Windy_Hill** » Fri May 11, 2012 2:23 pm

swoodley wrote:
Windy_Hill wrote:
swoodley wrote:
Windy_Hill wrote:
Windy Hille wrote:What a hypocritical thread! The author wants new members but was directly responsible for trying to get me AXED for no good reason!

Huh? You still pissed over that...get over it junior

(and havent you been the find of the century since joining)

Really looking forward to your next half interesting contribution to this forum.

Pest
meeow...
C'mon Swoods, the guy wont give it a rest, havent we moved on?? I mean seriously.
haha...c'mon Windy...are you sure you're over it

I thought I was

Bombertalk - is the end nigh?

Re: Bombertalk - is the end nigh?

Re: Bombertalk - is the end nigh?

Re: Bombertalk - is the end nigh?

Re: Bombertalk - is the end nigh?

Re: Bombertalk - is the end nigh?

Re: Bombertalk - is the end nigh?

Re: Bombertalk - is the end nigh?

Re: Bombertalk - is the end nigh?

Re: Bombertalk - is the end nigh?

Re: Bombertalk - is the end nigh?

Re: Bombertalk - is the end nigh?

Re: Bombertalk - is the end nigh?

Re: Bombertalk - is the end nigh?

Re: Bombertalk - is the end nigh?

Re: Bombertalk - is the end nigh?

Re: Bombertalk - is the end nigh?

Re: Bombertalk - is the end nigh?

Re: Bombertalk - is the end nigh?

Re: Bombertalk - is the end nigh?

Re: Bombertalk - is the end nigh?