Bombertalk

3. Howlett
2. Winderlich
1. Hille


Struggled to find three.

5 Howlett
4 Colyer
3 Watson
2 Hille
1 Winderlich

5. watson
4.hille
3.winderlich
2.howlett
1.stanton

Would you believe that Howlett had 18 possies for 50% effeciency?

nomolos wrote:Would you believe that Howlett had 18 possies for 50% effeciency?

no i wouldnt, did seem to go hard at it though, and apply pressure

Winderlich????

3. Watson - great 2.5 quarters from an injured player
2. Hurley
1. Colyer (didn't give up)

Not much else to pick from ... Howlett, Hille in the 2nd half, Hardingham took a few good grabs - but OMG the kicking!!!

Stanton - I cannot forgive his lack of discipline in the 3rd quarter that lost our momentum.

sti

Howlett did have 3 clearances and 8 contested possession and 5 clangers. However had 13 tackles the highest in the team.

Scott wrote:Winderlich????

If thats a question to me then.

Winderlich had 18 for 89% efficiency

Oh gee this is going to be difficult.

3. Howlett- looked like he gave a f***
2. Watson- tried hard and did better than more on 1 leg
1.Colyer- didn't give up but didn't have much help

I don't feel like giving the "best 5", but what the heck...

5. Dustin Fletcher
4. Michael Hurley
3. David Hille
2. Jobe Watson
1. Travis Colyer

What in f*** name is going on about set shots for goal. FFS, that was circus stuff. Love Hardinghams attack on the ball and his wonderful leap and grabs - but 2 goals 5 f****** behinds

And Jay Neagle can just go and find a f****** paddock and graze with the cows.

3. Winderlich
2. Hille
1. Watson

Fletch Mr Doolan? I thought he was well minimised by Ratten's tactic with Robinson.

tonysoprano wrote:3. Winderlich
2. Hille
1. Watson

Fletch Mr Doolan? I thought he was well minimised by Ratten's tactic with Robinson.

Agree. Would love to have seen him sent forward late in the 3rd for the rest of the game.

tonysoprano wrote: Fletch Mr Doolan? I thought he was well minimised by Ratten's tactic with Robinson.

Yep, and he still looked better than everyone else. Spoiling, 2nd efforts, 1 percenters etc - things that hardly get noticed. The very things hardly anyone else bothered doing apart from him and Hocking.

3. Hardingham (kept presenting and clunked onto a lot of good marks. Pity about the goal kicking accuracy)
2. Howlett (the more I see you the more I like you)
1. Colyer (you cant question the lad's endeavour)

5. Hurley
4. Colyer
3. Howlett
2. Hille
1. Watson

5. Colyer
4. Hurley
3. Hille
2. Winderlich
1. Stanton

Howlett, Hardingham also ok barring efficiency.

I still feel sick thinking about the game.