Votes v Brisbane
Votes v Brisbane
5. Zaka
4. Monfries
3. Hooker
2. Myers
1. Hocking
Also good: Hille, Bellchambers, Howlett, McVeigh, Fletcher.
4. Monfries
3. Hooker
2. Myers
1. Hocking
Also good: Hille, Bellchambers, Howlett, McVeigh, Fletcher.
- Mrs Mercuri
- Champion of Essendon
- Posts: 7035
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 3:12 pm
- Location: Melbourne
Re: Votes v Brisbane
5- Hooker
4- Zaka
3- Howlett
2- McVeigh
1- Hille
Mentions to Hocking, Hibberd, Myers and Bellchambers
4- Zaka
3- Howlett
2- McVeigh
1- Hille
Mentions to Hocking, Hibberd, Myers and Bellchambers
![Image](http://i920.photobucket.com/albums/ad45/Bombergrl00/BrendonG_zpsc3d19e1e.jpg)
Re: Votes v Brisbane
5. Myers
4. Zacha
3. Hooker
2. Howlett
1. McVeigh
Apols to TBell, Monfries, Hocking, Fletch and Hibberd
4. Zacha
3. Hooker
2. Howlett
1. McVeigh
Apols to TBell, Monfries, Hocking, Fletch and Hibberd
dices ad adepto futui (tell them to f*** off)
Re: Votes v Brisbane
I thought Hardingham was great tonight.
I would go
5 Myers
4 Belly
3 Hardingham
2 Zaka
1 Hooker.
I would go
5 Myers
4 Belly
3 Hardingham
2 Zaka
1 Hooker.
Re: Votes v Brisbane
5. Myers. 31 poss & 16 contested (highest) at 81%. 6 marks & 2 contested. 4 clearances. Impressive performance. Looked good in the middle as expected.
4. McVeigh. 20 poss & 6 contested at 95% (highest). 6 marks & 2 contested. Thought he played his role excellently. Whilst others kicked far too high, his kicks were perfect.
3. Zaka. 25 poss & 14 contested at 56%. 4 marks, 6 tackles. 4 goals. Dodgy early, but his 2nd 1/2 was very good & his 4 goals gave us the reward we needed inside 50.
2. Gus. 21 poss & 9 contested at 86%. 7 marks & 1 contested. 4 clearances. 1 tackle. 2 goals. Polished game - contested poss, efficiency, marks, clearances, & 2 goals.
1. Hooker. 24 poss & 10 contested at 75%. 9 marks (highest) & 5 contested (highest). Strong around the contest. Solid game.
Apologies to Hocking. 26 poss & 15 contested at 62%. 2 marks. 4 clearances. 8 tackles. Usual strong work, possessions,and limited the Bris midfield.
Howlett (10 tackles), Hibberd, Fletch, Hardingham.
4. McVeigh. 20 poss & 6 contested at 95% (highest). 6 marks & 2 contested. Thought he played his role excellently. Whilst others kicked far too high, his kicks were perfect.
3. Zaka. 25 poss & 14 contested at 56%. 4 marks, 6 tackles. 4 goals. Dodgy early, but his 2nd 1/2 was very good & his 4 goals gave us the reward we needed inside 50.
2. Gus. 21 poss & 9 contested at 86%. 7 marks & 1 contested. 4 clearances. 1 tackle. 2 goals. Polished game - contested poss, efficiency, marks, clearances, & 2 goals.
1. Hooker. 24 poss & 10 contested at 75%. 9 marks (highest) & 5 contested (highest). Strong around the contest. Solid game.
Apologies to Hocking. 26 poss & 15 contested at 62%. 2 marks. 4 clearances. 8 tackles. Usual strong work, possessions,and limited the Bris midfield.
Howlett (10 tackles), Hibberd, Fletch, Hardingham.
Re: Votes v Brisbane
5. Cale Hooker
4. David Zaharakis
3. David Myers
2. Heath Hocking
1. Angus Monfries (or should that be Angus Morefrees?)
4. David Zaharakis
3. David Myers
2. Heath Hocking
1. Angus Monfries (or should that be Angus Morefrees?)
Essendunny
![Image](https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTtGfLBP8vXxPdMF-_j_GH0nIyt4KhS53B5GQ&usqp=CAU)
Re: Votes v Brisbane
3. Myers
2. McVeigh - Touched up McGrath after McGrath kicked the first 2.
1. Zaharakis - (poor disposal hur though)
Hille doesn't get in because of that stupid play on in the goal square and missed. Hocking doesn't get in because he has cost us a 3 week holiday.
2. McVeigh - Touched up McGrath after McGrath kicked the first 2.
1. Zaharakis - (poor disposal hur though)
Hille doesn't get in because of that stupid play on in the goal square and missed. Hocking doesn't get in because he has cost us a 3 week holiday.
He kicks on the left
He kicks on the riiiiiiiiigggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhttttttttttttt
That boy Hurley
Makes Riewoldt look shite!
He kicks on the riiiiiiiiigggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhttttttttttttt
That boy Hurley
Makes Riewoldt look shite!
Re: Votes v Brisbane
Did he? Didn't look like it from any camera angle.Rossoneri wrote: Hille doesn't get in because of that stupid play on in the goal square and missed.
Still played a damn good game.Hocking doesn't get in because he has cost us a 3 week holiday.
Essendunny
![Image](https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTtGfLBP8vXxPdMF-_j_GH0nIyt4KhS53B5GQ&usqp=CAU)
Re: Votes v Brisbane
Was right behind ghe goals.was a goal 110%. Umpire got it wrong.everyone was shoc
ked
ked
- Windy_Hill
- Champion of Essendon
- Posts: 12859
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:23 pm
Re: Votes v Brisbane
5 Myers
4 Zaharakis
3 Hooker
2 Hocking
1 Monfries
4 Zaharakis
3 Hooker
2 Hocking
1 Monfries
Re: Votes v Brisbane
5. Myers
4. Hooker
3. McVeigh
2. Zaharkis
1. Monfries
4. Hooker
3. McVeigh
2. Zaharkis
1. Monfries
Re: Votes v Brisbane
5 - Myers
4 - Zaharakis
3 - Hooker
2 - Bellchambers
1 - McVeigh
4 - Zaharakis
3 - Hooker
2 - Bellchambers
1 - McVeigh
My material isn't very good..Oh...and then there's the bladder problem.
Re: Votes v Brisbane
5. Myers
4. Zaharakis
3. Hocking
2. Bellchambers
1. Monfries
4. Zaharakis
3. Hocking
2. Bellchambers
1. Monfries
Re: Votes v Brisbane
5- D Zaharakis
4- K. Hardingham
3- A.Monfries
2- D.Myers
1- M.Hibberd
4- K. Hardingham
3- A.Monfries
2- D.Myers
1- M.Hibberd
Re: Votes v Brisbane
5. Zaharakis
4. Howlett
3. Hocking
2. Myers
1. Hardingham
4. Howlett
3. Hocking
2. Myers
1. Hardingham