Hooker
Hooker
Cops a lot of flack on here but his shut down job on Petrie last night was first class.
Petrie kicked 2 goals for the entire game and one of those came from that chest shove.
Hooker had him so well beaten they actually moved him into the ruck for a few minutes to get him involved in the play. Considering they already had 2 ruckmen out there thats big props to Hooker IMO.
Thoughts?
Petrie kicked 2 goals for the entire game and one of those came from that chest shove.
Hooker had him so well beaten they actually moved him into the ruck for a few minutes to get him involved in the play. Considering they already had 2 ruckmen out there thats big props to Hooker IMO.
Thoughts?
Essendon Football Club- We arent arrogant, just deluded.
Re: Hooker
Exactly right. Played a ripper last night..
- bomberdonnie
- Champion of Essendon
- Posts: 8575
- Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 7:25 pm
- Location: Old Hobart Town
Re: Hooker
Yeah I liked his game
Definitely stronger and fitter
Definitely stronger and fitter
Re: Hooker
Kept Petrie to 13 disposals. I think people are going to crimminally under rate this performance just because they dont want to admitt that maybe Hooker isn't a spud.
Essendon Football Club- We arent arrogant, just deluded.
Re: Hooker
THIS.boncer34 wrote:Kept Petrie to 13 disposals. I think people are going to crimminally under rate this performance just because they dont want to admitt that maybe Hooker isn't a spud.
Re: Hooker
His first ten minutes or so were rancid.
But after that he was outstanding.
But after that he was outstanding.
You couldn't fool your own mother on the foolingest day of your life with an electrified fooling machine.
- Windy_Hill
- Champion of Essendon
- Posts: 12859
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:23 pm
Re: Hooker
Great news on Hooker but what about Pears? How did he go?
Re: Hooker
Struggled a bit since he played loose a fair bit.Windy_Hill wrote:Great news on Hooker but what about Pears? How did he go?
North didn't really have the second power forward for him to go to.
Just doesn't look set playing 3rd man up.
Essendon Football Club- We arent arrogant, just deluded.
Re: Hooker
Servicable, and that's about all. Rubbish start to the game, and then was ok. Let's not get carried away though, one on one he is still very spudly, and Petrie was held because Hibberd and Fletcher started doing a good job of being the 3rd man up.
Some of you really over-rate this bloke. If Hooker's game was "good", Hibberd's must have been Hall of Fame like.
Some of you really over-rate this bloke. If Hooker's game was "good", Hibberd's must have been Hall of Fame like.
Re: Hooker
I don't think we over-rate.robbie67 wrote:Servicable, and that's about all. Rubbish start to the game, and then was ok. Let's not get carried away though, one on one he is still very spudly, and Petrie was held because Hibberd and Fletcher started doing a good job of being the 3rd man up.
Some of you really over-rate this bloke. If Hooker's game was "good", Hibberd's must have been Hall of Fame like.
I think you just can't handle being wrong.
![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
But in any case robbie I'm not going to argue with you as I doubt another shit fight is what this board needs.
Essendon Football Club- We arent arrogant, just deluded.
Re: Hooker
Geez Boncer, lets not discuss anything then.
That last comment get you all excited about having the moral high ground? Passive agressive the new black for you is it?
That last comment get you all excited about having the moral high ground? Passive agressive the new black for you is it?
Re: Hooker
He wasn't too bad but still makes a lot of errors under pressure.
Re: Hooker
People that follow clubs that regularly finish in the bottom of half of the ladder dont worry about this though. As long as he is better than whatever else we have on the list.robrulz5 wrote:He wasn't too bad but still makes a lot of errors under pressure.
Re: Hooker
More the fact that the discussion is pointless yes? I think he played very well last night and you disagree.robbie67 wrote:Geez Boncer, lets not discuss anything then.
That last comment get you all excited about having the moral high ground? Passive agressive the new black for you is it?
Are you going to budge? No.
Am I? No.
But by all means lets enter into a pointless discussion which ends with you calling me a f***wit and ridiculing my view every time Hookers name is mentioned.
Essendon Football Club- We arent arrogant, just deluded.
Re: Hooker
Other than a couple of times early on, he played his role extremely well. I'd give him a 7.5/10, which is solid.
Re: Hooker
Really Boncer? Why did you start the thread? So everyone could agree with you?
At least when I disagree with you, I present some facts to back my statement up. Are you really still that upset that your boy Knights got the arse? Time to get over it.
At least when I disagree with you, I present some facts to back my statement up. Are you really still that upset that your boy Knights got the arse? Time to get over it.
Re: Hooker
robbie67 wrote:Really Boncer? Why did you start the thread? So everyone could agree with you?
At least when I disagree with you, I present some facts to back my statement up. Are you really still that upset that your boy Knights got the arse? Time to get over it.
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
As for "facts." You stated he was serviceable in your opinion and then said Fletcher and Hibber, in your opinion, were good at 3rd man up.
Hardly facts.
But congrats on getting your bite out of me. Kudos.
Essendon Football Club- We arent arrogant, just deluded.
Re: Hooker
Lets just say I know where your being upset with me comes from Boncer.
Re: Hooker
Wish I did.robbie67 wrote:Lets just say I know where your being upset with me comes from Boncer.
![Sad :(](./images/smilies/icon_sad.gif)
Since I said I was happy to disagree with you.
Essendon Football Club- We arent arrogant, just deluded.