Votes v Richmond
Votes v Richmond
5. Watson
4. Stanton
3. Crameri
2. Ryder
1. Carlisle
Flecther, Davey, Jetta, Monfries, Hurley, Hooker, Zaka, Howlett also good.
4. Stanton
3. Crameri
2. Ryder
1. Carlisle
Flecther, Davey, Jetta, Monfries, Hurley, Hooker, Zaka, Howlett also good.
Last edited by robbie67 on Sat May 19, 2012 10:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Windy_Hill
- Champion of Essendon
- Posts: 12859
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:23 pm
Re: Votes v Richmond
5.Watson
4.Crameri
3.Stanton
2.Hooker
1.Howlett
4.Crameri
3.Stanton
2.Hooker
1.Howlett
Last edited by Windy_Hill on Sat May 19, 2012 11:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- bomberdonnie
- Champion of Essendon
- Posts: 8575
- Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 7:25 pm
- Location: Old Hobart Town
Re: Votes v Richmond
5. Watson
4. Stanton
3. Crameri
2. Ryder
1. Hooker
f*** Watson is good ... Darcy gave him man of the match and said he is untaggable
4. Stanton
3. Crameri
2. Ryder
1. Hooker
f*** Watson is good ... Darcy gave him man of the match and said he is untaggable
Re: Votes v Richmond
5. Watson
4. Stanton
3. Hooker (kept Riwoldt to 1 goal and a handful of touches)
2. Crameri
1. Ryder (for his first quarter alone, now if he could only put for of those together in a row)
4. Stanton
3. Hooker (kept Riwoldt to 1 goal and a handful of touches)
2. Crameri
1. Ryder (for his first quarter alone, now if he could only put for of those together in a row)
Re: Votes v Richmond
5. Stanton
4. Ryder
3. Hurley (the only one who looked like he wanted the side to win after 1/2 time) .. was the difference in the end
2. Hooker
1. Watson (when 3 out of 5 disposals go to the opposition ... not a great night)
Apols to Zacha and Crameri ...
4. Ryder
3. Hurley (the only one who looked like he wanted the side to win after 1/2 time) .. was the difference in the end
2. Hooker
1. Watson (when 3 out of 5 disposals go to the opposition ... not a great night)
Apols to Zacha and Crameri ...
dices ad adepto futui (tell them to f*** off)
- Windy_Hill
- Champion of Essendon
- Posts: 12859
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:23 pm
Re: Votes v Richmond
s'dreams wrote:5. Stanton
1. Watson (when 3 out of 5 disposals go to the opposition ... not a great night)
Sorry, I havent seen the stats - are you saying he turned the ball over 3 time out of every 5 possessions??
- bomberdonnie
- Champion of Essendon
- Posts: 8575
- Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 7:25 pm
- Location: Old Hobart Town
Re: Votes v Richmond
More like 3 all nightWindy_Hill wrote:s'dreams wrote:5. Stanton
1. Watson (when 3 out of 5 disposals go to the opposition ... not a great night)
Sorry, I havent seen the stats - are you saying he turned the ball over 3 time out of every 5 possessions??
He won the game for us... Get some perspective
Re: Votes v Richmond
Check the stats ... though I was a bit excitable - more like 3 out of 5 kicks were turned over - many to softies... but yes he did help win the game with his work in the forward 50 ...bomberdonnie wrote:More like 3 all nightWindy_Hill wrote:s'dreams wrote:5. Stanton
1. Watson (when 3 out of 5 disposals go to the opposition ... not a great night)
Sorry, I havent seen the stats - are you saying he turned the ball over 3 time out of every 5 possessions??
He won the game for us... Get some perspective
dices ad adepto futui (tell them to f*** off)
- bomberdonnie
- Champion of Essendon
- Posts: 8575
- Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 7:25 pm
- Location: Old Hobart Town
Re: Votes v Richmond
Had 5 clangers but still won us he game
- Windy_Hill
- Champion of Essendon
- Posts: 12859
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:23 pm
Re: Votes v Richmond
s'dreams wrote:Check the stats ... though I was a bit excitable - more like 3 out of 5 kicks were turned over - many to softies... but yes he did help win the game with his work in the forward 50 ...bomberdonnie wrote:More like 3 all nightWindy_Hill wrote:s'dreams wrote:5. Stanton
1. Watson (when 3 out of 5 disposals go to the opposition ... not a great night)
Sorry, I havent seen the stats - are you saying he turned the ball over 3 time out of every 5 possessions??
He won the game for us... Get some perspective
Am still not sure what you are trying to say???? What do you mean 3 out of 5 kicks were turned over he had 17 kicks
Re: Votes v Richmond
'tis best I withdraw from the argument with what little dignity I have left and save my negaitve thoughts for another time ... say when I'm not so annnoyed and the TV doesn't have a dent in it!Windy_Hill wrote:s'dreams wrote:Check the stats ... though I was a bit excitable - more like 3 out of 5 kicks were turned over - many to softies... but yes he did help win the game with his work in the forward 50 ...bomberdonnie wrote:More like 3 all nightWindy_Hill wrote:s'dreams wrote:5. Stanton
1. Watson (when 3 out of 5 disposals go to the opposition ... not a great night)
Sorry, I havent seen the stats - are you saying he turned the ball over 3 time out of every 5 possessions??
He won the game for us... Get some perspective
Am still not sure what you are trying to say???? What do you mean 3 out of 5 kicks were turned over he had 17 kicks
dices ad adepto futui (tell them to f*** off)
Re: Votes v Richmond
5. Stanton
4. Watson
3. Ryder
2. Crameri
1. Hooker
4. Watson
3. Ryder
2. Crameri
1. Hooker
-
- Champion of Essendon
- Posts: 7110
- Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 12:51 pm
- Location: Sydney (Don't hold it against me)
- Contact:
Re: Votes v Richmond
5. Stanton
4. Paddy
3. Jetta
2. Watson
1. Crammers
For me, I found it a tad hard cause I think we got creamed around the clearances most of the night, but particularly badly during the second half.
4. Paddy
3. Jetta
2. Watson
1. Crammers
For me, I found it a tad hard cause I think we got creamed around the clearances most of the night, but particularly badly during the second half.
Re: Votes v Richmond
5. Brent Stanton
4. Jobe Watson
3. Paddy Ryder
2. Stewart Crameri
1. David Zaharakis
4. Jobe Watson
3. Paddy Ryder
2. Stewart Crameri
1. David Zaharakis
Essendunny
![Image](https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTtGfLBP8vXxPdMF-_j_GH0nIyt4KhS53B5GQ&usqp=CAU)
Re: Votes v Richmond
5. Watson
4. Stanton
3. Ryder
2. Crameri
1. Davey
4. Stanton
3. Ryder
2. Crameri
1. Davey
Re: Votes v Richmond
5. Watson
4. Crameri
3. Hooker
2. Stanton
1. Lonergan
4. Crameri
3. Hooker
2. Stanton
1. Lonergan
"You can quote me on this... He is gawn" - bomberdonnie re Hurley's contract status 25 February 2012
- Mrs Mercuri
- Champion of Essendon
- Posts: 7035
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 3:12 pm
- Location: Melbourne
Re: Votes v Richmond
5- Watto
4- Stants
3- Hooker
2- Ryder
1- Davey
Mentions to Zaka, Jetta, Howlett, Crameri and Hurls
4- Stants
3- Hooker
2- Ryder
1- Davey
Mentions to Zaka, Jetta, Howlett, Crameri and Hurls
![Image](http://i920.photobucket.com/albums/ad45/Bombergrl00/BrendonG_zpsc3d19e1e.jpg)
Re: Votes v Richmond
+ 1Mrs Mercuri wrote:5- Watto
4- Stants
3- Hooker
2- Ryder
1- Davey
Mentions to Zaka, Jetta, Howlett, Crameri and Hurls
My material isn't very good..Oh...and then there's the bladder problem.
Re: Votes v Richmond
5. Watson
4. Stanton
3. Crameri
2. Hurley - great to have him back, straightens us up and takes pressure of stewy.
1. Ryder
4. Stanton
3. Crameri
2. Hurley - great to have him back, straightens us up and takes pressure of stewy.
1. Ryder