Page 1 of 2

Votes v Richmond

Posted: Sat May 19, 2012 10:53 pm
by robbie67
5. Watson
4. Stanton
3. Crameri
2. Ryder
1. Carlisle

Flecther, Davey, Jetta, Monfries, Hurley, Hooker, Zaka, Howlett also good.

Re: Votes v Richmond

Posted: Sat May 19, 2012 10:54 pm
by Windy_Hill
5.Watson
4.Crameri
3.Stanton
2.Hooker
1.Howlett

Re: Votes v Richmond

Posted: Sat May 19, 2012 10:56 pm
by bomberdonnie
5. Watson
4. Stanton
3. Crameri
2. Ryder
1. Hooker

f*** Watson is good ... Darcy gave him man of the match and said he is untaggable

Re: Votes v Richmond

Posted: Sat May 19, 2012 11:02 pm
by ealesy
5. Watson
4. Stanton
3. Hooker (kept Riwoldt to 1 goal and a handful of touches)
2. Crameri
1. Ryder (for his first quarter alone, now if he could only put for of those together in a row)

Re: Votes v Richmond

Posted: Sat May 19, 2012 11:05 pm
by s'dreams
5. Stanton
4. Ryder
3. Hurley (the only one who looked like he wanted the side to win after 1/2 time) .. was the difference in the end
2. Hooker
1. Watson (when 3 out of 5 disposals go to the opposition ... not a great night)

Apols to Zacha and Crameri ...

Re: Votes v Richmond

Posted: Sat May 19, 2012 11:09 pm
by Windy_Hill
s'dreams wrote:5. Stanton

1. Watson (when 3 out of 5 disposals go to the opposition ... not a great night)


Sorry, I havent seen the stats - are you saying he turned the ball over 3 time out of every 5 possessions??

Re: Votes v Richmond

Posted: Sat May 19, 2012 11:13 pm
by bomberdonnie
Windy_Hill wrote:
s'dreams wrote:5. Stanton

1. Watson (when 3 out of 5 disposals go to the opposition ... not a great night)


Sorry, I havent seen the stats - are you saying he turned the ball over 3 time out of every 5 possessions??
More like 3 all night

He won the game for us... Get some perspective

Re: Votes v Richmond

Posted: Sat May 19, 2012 11:17 pm
by s'dreams
bomberdonnie wrote:
Windy_Hill wrote:
s'dreams wrote:5. Stanton

1. Watson (when 3 out of 5 disposals go to the opposition ... not a great night)

Sorry, I havent seen the stats - are you saying he turned the ball over 3 time out of every 5 possessions??
More like 3 all night

He won the game for us... Get some perspective
Check the stats ... though I was a bit excitable - more like 3 out of 5 kicks were turned over - many to softies... but yes he did help win the game with his work in the forward 50 ...

Re: Votes v Richmond

Posted: Sat May 19, 2012 11:20 pm
by bomberdonnie
Had 5 clangers but still won us he game

Re: Votes v Richmond

Posted: Sat May 19, 2012 11:39 pm
by Windy_Hill
s'dreams wrote:
bomberdonnie wrote:
Windy_Hill wrote:
s'dreams wrote:5. Stanton

1. Watson (when 3 out of 5 disposals go to the opposition ... not a great night)

Sorry, I havent seen the stats - are you saying he turned the ball over 3 time out of every 5 possessions??
More like 3 all night

He won the game for us... Get some perspective
Check the stats ... though I was a bit excitable - more like 3 out of 5 kicks were turned over - many to softies... but yes he did help win the game with his work in the forward 50 ...

Am still not sure what you are trying to say???? What do you mean 3 out of 5 kicks were turned over he had 17 kicks

Re: Votes v Richmond

Posted: Sat May 19, 2012 11:51 pm
by s'dreams
Windy_Hill wrote:
s'dreams wrote:
bomberdonnie wrote:
Windy_Hill wrote:
s'dreams wrote:5. Stanton

1. Watson (when 3 out of 5 disposals go to the opposition ... not a great night)

Sorry, I havent seen the stats - are you saying he turned the ball over 3 time out of every 5 possessions??
More like 3 all night

He won the game for us... Get some perspective
Check the stats ... though I was a bit excitable - more like 3 out of 5 kicks were turned over - many to softies... but yes he did help win the game with his work in the forward 50 ...

Am still not sure what you are trying to say???? What do you mean 3 out of 5 kicks were turned over he had 17 kicks
'tis best I withdraw from the argument with what little dignity I have left and save my negaitve thoughts for another time ... say when I'm not so annnoyed and the TV doesn't have a dent in it!

Re: Votes v Richmond

Posted: Sun May 20, 2012 12:02 am
by Royza
5. Stanton
4. Watson
3. Ryder
2. Crameri
1. Hooker

Re: Votes v Richmond

Posted: Sun May 20, 2012 12:17 am
by Crazyman
5. Stanton
4. Paddy
3. Jetta
2. Watson
1. Crammers

For me, I found it a tad hard cause I think we got creamed around the clearances most of the night, but particularly badly during the second half.

Re: Votes v Richmond

Posted: Sun May 20, 2012 12:19 am
by F111
3. 5
2. 4
1. 26

Re: Votes v Richmond

Posted: Sun May 20, 2012 12:42 am
by BenDoolan
5. Brent Stanton
4. Jobe Watson
3. Paddy Ryder
2. Stewart Crameri
1. David Zaharakis

Re: Votes v Richmond

Posted: Sun May 20, 2012 1:22 am
by robrulz5
5. Watson
4. Stanton
3. Ryder
2. Crameri
1. Davey

Re: Votes v Richmond

Posted: Sun May 20, 2012 1:39 am
by swoodley
5. Watson
4. Crameri
3. Hooker
2. Stanton
1. Lonergan

Re: Votes v Richmond

Posted: Sun May 20, 2012 8:04 pm
by Mrs Mercuri
5- Watto
4- Stants
3- Hooker
2- Ryder
1- Davey

Mentions to Zaka, Jetta, Howlett, Crameri and Hurls

Re: Votes v Richmond

Posted: Sun May 20, 2012 10:26 pm
by hop
Mrs Mercuri wrote:5- Watto
4- Stants
3- Hooker
2- Ryder
1- Davey

Mentions to Zaka, Jetta, Howlett, Crameri and Hurls
+ 1

Re: Votes v Richmond

Posted: Mon May 21, 2012 12:23 pm
by DYSON#2
5. Watson
4. Stanton
3. Crameri
2. Hurley - great to have him back, straightens us up and takes pressure of stewy.
1. Ryder