I mean hey...

Talk about everything Essendon. Past, Present and Future if it's about the Bombers this is the place to be.
Post Reply
User avatar
nomolos
Club Captain
Posts: 2886
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:51 pm

I mean hey...

Post by nomolos » Sat Mar 26, 2016 8:35 pm

We are expected to be shit this year.

Collingwoods excuse is??





Always a upside.

User avatar
BenDoolan
Essendon Legend
Posts: 25687
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 9:10 pm

Re: I mean hey...

Post by BenDoolan » Sat Mar 26, 2016 8:49 pm

Must be the white lines on their jumper
Unfortunately, you can't drown a witch!

User avatar
billyduckworth
Club Captain
Posts: 2941
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 11:16 am
Location: Fawkner

Re: I mean hey...

Post by billyduckworth » Sat Mar 26, 2016 10:05 pm

Or some other kind of white lines?

User avatar
ealesy
Champion of Essendon
Posts: 5576
Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 8:19 pm

Re: I mean hey...

Post by ealesy » Sun Mar 27, 2016 8:28 am

Listen to the media f***tards last night talk about how the media attention of the last 24-48 hours must have got to them and distracted them.

Also Buckley having a sook about the system being set up to protect the players privacy and yet it was breached.

Boo f****** hoo you pathetic arseholes, just par of the course for the past 4 years for us you cock spanks and you have already soooked more than our club.

User avatar
BenDoolan
Essendon Legend
Posts: 25687
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 9:10 pm

Re: I mean hey...

Post by BenDoolan » Sun Mar 27, 2016 8:35 am

ealesy wrote:Listen to the media f***tards last night talk about how the media attention of the last 24-48 hours must have got to them and distracted them.

Also Buckley having a sook about the system being set up to protect the players privacy and yet it was breached.

Boo f****** hoo you pathetic arseholes, just par of the course for the past 4 years for us you cock spanks and you have already soooked more than our club.
I don't actually get Buckley's comment "the players signed up to the tests under the veil of anonymity and they feel that confidentiality has been breached".

Were any players named? If not, how has their anonymity been breached?
Unfortunately, you can't drown a witch!

User avatar
F111
Essendon Legend
Posts: 15500
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 8:55 pm

Re: I mean hey...

Post by F111 » Sun Mar 27, 2016 11:59 am

Yeah, well, they may not be named, but it's only one step away.
If I was a player, I'd be p!ssed off too.
The AFL can not be trusted.

User avatar
BenDoolan
Essendon Legend
Posts: 25687
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 9:10 pm

Re: I mean hey...

Post by BenDoolan » Sun Mar 27, 2016 12:56 pm

F111 wrote:Yeah, well, they may not be named, but it's only one step away.
If I was a player, I'd be p!ssed off too.
The AFL can not be trusted.
They should all be named. f*** 'em.

If a player engaged in racist taunts - named and shamed.
If a player engaged in drink driving - named and shamed.
If a player engaged in abusing women - named and shamed.

If a player engages in illicit drug taking - sweep it under the carpet and protect them.

f*** off.
Unfortunately, you can't drown a witch!

User avatar
auditor
High Draft Pick
Posts: 746
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 9:47 pm

Re: I mean hey...

Post by auditor » Sun Mar 27, 2016 4:00 pm

BenDoolan wrote:
F111 wrote:Yeah, well, they may not be named, but it's only one step away.
If I was a player, I'd be p!ssed off too.
The AFL can not be trusted.
They should all be named. f*** 'em.

If a player engaged in racist taunts - named and shamed.
If a player engaged in drink driving - named and shamed.
If a player engaged in abusing women - named and shamed.

If a player engages in illicit drug taking - sweep it under the carpet and protect them.

f*** off.
Spot on! =D>
It just fell out of the sky

User avatar
F111
Essendon Legend
Posts: 15500
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 8:55 pm

Re: I mean hey...

Post by F111 » Sun Mar 27, 2016 11:50 pm

BenDoolan wrote:
F111 wrote:Yeah, well, they may not be named, but it's only one step away.
If I was a player, I'd be p!ssed off too.
The AFL can not be trusted.
They should all be named. f*** 'em.

If a player engaged in racist taunts - named and shamed.
If a player engaged in drink driving - named and shamed.
If a player engaged in abusing women - named and shamed.

If a player engages in illicit drug taking - sweep it under the carpet and protect them.

f*** off.
I don't disagree with that. However, if I was a player and believed the system guaranteed anonymity, then I'd be p!ssed.
I think the three strikes thing was hilarious, and the two strikes one almost as silly. They should face some music if and when caught.

User avatar
BenDoolan
Essendon Legend
Posts: 25687
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 9:10 pm

Re: I mean hey...

Post by BenDoolan » Mon Mar 28, 2016 12:04 am

F111 wrote:
BenDoolan wrote:
F111 wrote:Yeah, well, they may not be named, but it's only one step away.
If I was a player, I'd be p!ssed off too.
The AFL can not be trusted.
They should all be named. f*** 'em.

If a player engaged in racist taunts - named and shamed.
If a player engaged in drink driving - named and shamed.
If a player engaged in abusing women - named and shamed.

If a player engages in illicit drug taking - sweep it under the carpet and protect them.

f*** off.
I don't disagree with that. However, if I was a player and believed the system guaranteed anonymity, then I'd be p!ssed.
I think the three strikes thing was hilarious, and the two strikes one almost as silly. They should face some music if and when caught.
I reckon they have a right to be peeved simply because two other clubs were ranked worse than Collingwood, yet no mention which clubs they are. That to me is bullshit.

The players anonymity is intact. There's nothing that says the club can't be mentioned.
Unfortunately, you can't drown a witch!

User avatar
F111
Essendon Legend
Posts: 15500
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 8:55 pm

Re: I mean hey...

Post by F111 » Mon Mar 28, 2016 1:50 am

As I initially wrote "only one step away".

mdso
Club Captain
Posts: 3153
Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2013 7:55 am
Location: Merimbula, Far South Coast of N.SW.

Re: I mean hey...

Post by mdso » Mon Mar 28, 2016 1:49 pm

The poor afl, WHAT ARE THEY GOING TO DO, NOT ANOTHER TEAM WITH ELEVEN PLAYERS OUT. Omg!!! In your dreams.
Nothing usually happens until something happens.

User avatar
hop
Club Captain
Posts: 3772
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 8:41 am
Location: Napier Street

Re: I mean hey...

Post by hop » Tue Mar 29, 2016 4:56 pm

BenDoolan wrote:
F111 wrote:
BenDoolan wrote:
F111 wrote:Yeah, well, they may not be named, but it's only one step away.
If I was a player, I'd be p!ssed off too.
The AFL can not be trusted.
They should all be named. f*** 'em.

If a player engaged in racist taunts - named and shamed.
If a player engaged in drink driving - named and shamed.
If a player engaged in abusing women - named and shamed.

If a player engages in illicit drug taking - sweep it under the carpet and protect them.

f*** off.
I don't disagree with that. However, if I was a player and believed the system guaranteed anonymity, then I'd be p!ssed.
I think the three strikes thing was hilarious, and the two strikes one almost as silly. They should face some music if and when caught.
I reckon they have a right to be peeved simply because two other clubs were ranked worse than Collingwood, yet no mention which clubs they are. That to me is bullshit.

The players anonymity is intact. There's nothing that says the club can't be mentioned.
Yeah and what's the chances of these two clubs being a start-up and/or a particular love-child of the AFL?
My material isn't very good..Oh...and then there's the bladder problem.

User avatar
BenDoolan
Essendon Legend
Posts: 25687
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 9:10 pm

Re: I mean hey...

Post by BenDoolan » Tue Mar 29, 2016 6:05 pm

hop wrote:
BenDoolan wrote:
F111 wrote:
BenDoolan wrote:
F111 wrote:Yeah, well, they may not be named, but it's only one step away.
If I was a player, I'd be p!ssed off too.
The AFL can not be trusted.
They should all be named. f*** 'em.

If a player engaged in racist taunts - named and shamed.
If a player engaged in drink driving - named and shamed.
If a player engaged in abusing women - named and shamed.

If a player engages in illicit drug taking - sweep it under the carpet and protect them.

f*** off.
I don't disagree with that. However, if I was a player and believed the system guaranteed anonymity, then I'd be p!ssed.
I think the three strikes thing was hilarious, and the two strikes one almost as silly. They should face some music if and when caught.
I reckon they have a right to be peeved simply because two other clubs were ranked worse than Collingwood, yet no mention which clubs they are. That to me is bullshit.

The players anonymity is intact. There's nothing that says the club can't be mentioned.
Yeah and what's the chances of these two clubs being a start-up and/or a particular love-child of the AFL?
Imagine if it were the current three-peated premiership team...
Unfortunately, you can't drown a witch!

grassy1
Champion of Essendon
Posts: 8318
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 8:48 pm

Re: I mean hey...

Post by grassy1 » Tue Mar 29, 2016 7:35 pm

Injunction?

Is it me,or does Jeff Kennett have the hide of a Rhinocerous on Drugs in the AFL? :roll:

Post Reply