Windy_Hill wrote: ↑
Sat Aug 31, 2019 3:39 pm
Windy Hille wrote: ↑
Sat Aug 31, 2019 8:50 am
Windy_Hill wrote: ↑
Sat Aug 31, 2019 12:17 am
Dylan Clarke C grade, Langford B? You're kidding right?
Dylan Clarke has jyst been nominated as a rising star. Already has 3 o 4 very significant scalps as a tagger over the last 8 games or so. His CV puts Langford's to shame in a third of the game time.
This is just getting silly now
So you think D. Clarke is B Grade and Langers is C? And that D. Clarke has a better CV
Where did I say that Sherlock? I didn’t. At least have the decency to acknowledge that. But seeing as you asked in your typical girlish shrill, yeah, Clarke has shown more in a handful of games than Langford has in 5 years. Any idiot can see that.
You really do provide a lot of comic relief around here.
So how else do you deduce your scoff “D. Clarke C Grade, Langford B Grade. You’re kidding right?”
You either scoff that D. Clarke is better than C Grade - because you follow up that he “has a better CV” than Langford, therefore, dropping Langers down a cog.
They both can’t be on the same rating because you clearly state that Clarke’s CV “puts Langers to shame”. Yes? YES?? YESSSSSSSS???
You’re argument is so utterly flawed.
Is it? Why?? Just because you disagree with it. Or most likely, don’t understand it, doesn’t mean it’s flawed. It’s pretty simple really. Unless, you’re simple yourself...
You keep persisting with the Jobe comparison which is cherry picking at its best. Just because 1 guy who started his career slowly and then went on to make it in the game doesn’t mean every player with similarly unimpressive stats will do the same.
Yeah, I’m not sure why I would compare 2 players with the same height, build, physical attributes, playing position, and similar stats. What was I thinking??? I should have compared Langers with Tristan Cartledge, or perhaps Ariel Steinberg
I can’t be arsed looking up the stats
Of course you can’t. Because you’re lazy. Just like your arguments. Clumsy, and laaaaazy.
but what if Langford’s are similar to Lovett-Murray or Mark Bolton or Courtney Dempsey or Marc Bullen or Shane Harvey or one of dozens of players who after the first part of their careers never really amounted to much. Why aren’t you comparing Langford to them.
Hmmm...yeaaaahhhhh. Let’s compare players in different positions and different physical attributes. Awesome idea! The stats will be all over the place. Just what we want to see!!
Never mind that both Jobe and Kyle started off as forwards who moved into the middle - as inside mids.
But yeah...let’s look at how Tristan Cartledge went with contested possessions and goal kicking stuff compared to Kylos.
No...you take a bog average player like Langford and assume because 1 player in a hundred overcame a slow start to his career to become a star of the game, he will as well. It’s plain dumb logic. At least Laverde can blame injuries.
No point pointing out that at this stage in his career is that he’s tracking along the same form line as Jobe. It’s a valid comparison and a valid point. I think even the most imbecilic individual could admit that.
You might be surprised at at the end of next season, he is still on par with Jobe at age 23. So it will show that his career is heading in the right direction. Make any sense to you? Or you still struggling with the C grade B grade ratings???