Dyson and others
Posted: Sat May 05, 2007 5:01 pm
Softest footballer in the comp is Dyson and for someone who supposedly has good skills coughs it up too often. IMO should be let go at the end of season...doesn't have it at AFL level.
Also, I would be playing for the future...and inject as much youth as possble...Houli, Lonergan, etc...since 2001 Essendon has refused to rebuild...and for that we are in the rut we are in now. That means Bolton and Heffernan and guys in that mould must go for good.
Watson has to go. You can't keep a guy who just handballs...it's flawed...once a bad kicker always a bad kicker...they should have these skills when they are recruited. If it wasn't for the Watson name he would be playing at the back of Bourke somewhere.
Sheedy has to go...he has not served up...he has not adapted to the midfield game that it is today and for that reason a pretty average forward line at Hawthorn was able to kick 20 goals due to a lack of defensive midfield pressure.
Also, they use Hird far too much. How are we going to develop when everything is channeled thru a guy who is playing his last year?
Also, I would be playing for the future...and inject as much youth as possble...Houli, Lonergan, etc...since 2001 Essendon has refused to rebuild...and for that we are in the rut we are in now. That means Bolton and Heffernan and guys in that mould must go for good.
Watson has to go. You can't keep a guy who just handballs...it's flawed...once a bad kicker always a bad kicker...they should have these skills when they are recruited. If it wasn't for the Watson name he would be playing at the back of Bourke somewhere.
Sheedy has to go...he has not served up...he has not adapted to the midfield game that it is today and for that reason a pretty average forward line at Hawthorn was able to kick 20 goals due to a lack of defensive midfield pressure.
Also, they use Hird far too much. How are we going to develop when everything is channeled thru a guy who is playing his last year?