Page 1 of 2
Teddy
Posted: Sat Sep 09, 2006 9:32 pm
by solly4me
I don't know about anyone else, but it is great to see Teddy doing so well for the Swans tonight! Shame he had to go up there, we could have really done with him this year.
Re: Teddy
Posted: Sat Sep 09, 2006 9:35 pm
by uptick
Tremendous opportunity for him.
solly4me wrote:I don't know about anyone else, but it is great to see Teddy doing so well for the Swans tonight! Shame he had to go up there, we could have really done with him this year.
Posted: Sat Sep 09, 2006 9:36 pm
by lozza89
Yeah Teddy is playing really well. I don't know why we ever gave him away!
Always liked him and always will like Teddy
Posted: Sat Sep 09, 2006 9:41 pm
by danstar84
He is ok, but nothing spectacular. Was sad to see him go, but I think that Dempesay will offer us a lot more in the upcoming years.
Posted: Sat Sep 09, 2006 10:16 pm
by robbie67
He is average. Under 10 possies a game this season. Was a passenger with us, and is still a passenger with them. He was good tonight though.
Posted: Sat Sep 09, 2006 10:17 pm
by swoodley
lozza89 wrote:Yeah Teddy is playing really well. I don't know why we ever gave him away!
Always liked him and always will like Teddy
We didn't give him away...he chose to leave in the hope that he would get more game time with Sydney (good choice by him)
Posted: Sat Sep 09, 2006 10:19 pm
by robbie67
swoodley wrote:lozza89 wrote:Yeah Teddy is playing really well. I don't know why we ever gave him away!
Always liked him and always will like Teddy
We didn't give him away...he chose to leave in the hope that he would get more game time with Sydney (good choice by him)
......and we got a first round draft pick for him. Great deal for us.
Posted: Sat Sep 09, 2006 10:24 pm
by Windy_Hill
Teddy is a tease.
Its the one or two games where he shines that allows him to get away with half a dozen where he does nothing. He is a batsman who averages around 35. Sometimes a decent score will come along but in the main, you need guys averaging 40-50.
Does that make any sense at all??
Posted: Sat Sep 09, 2006 10:30 pm
by robbie67
Windy_Hill wrote:Teddy is a tease.
Its the one or two games where he shines that allows him to get away with half a dozen where he does nothing. He is a batsman who averages around 35. Sometimes a decent score will come along but in the main, you need guys averaging 40-50.
Does that make any sense at all??
Yes, he is Mark Waugh without the style. A good side can carry him, but he was exposed in a poor one.
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 3:44 am
by Jazz_84
robbie67 wrote:Windy_Hill wrote:Teddy is a tease.
Its the one or two games where he shines that allows him to get away with half a dozen where he does nothing. He is a batsman who averages around 35. Sometimes a decent score will come along but in the main, you need guys averaging 40-50.
Does that make any sense at all??
Yes, he is Mark Waugh without the style. A good side can carry him, but he was exposed in a poor one.
mark waugh was the one that carried sides
im glad teddy went to sydney never liked him so he fits nicely at sydney
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 8:54 am
by Filthy
danstar84 wrote:He is ok, but nothing spectacular. Was sad to see him go, but I think that Dempesay will offer us a lot more in the upcoming years.
precisely
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 2:19 pm
by boncer34
robbie67 wrote:Windy_Hill wrote:Teddy is a tease.
Its the one or two games where he shines that allows him to get away with half a dozen where he does nothing. He is a batsman who averages around 35. Sometimes a decent score will come along but in the main, you need guys averaging 40-50.
Does that make any sense at all??
Yes, he is Mark Waugh without the style. A good side can carry him, but he was exposed in a poor one.
I would've gone with Clarke
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 2:53 pm
by Makaveli
Richards was a very handy player, should never of let him go and should have gotten more chances. Good work sheeds..
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 2:58 pm
by beer-man
a first round pick was robbery for him really. A good side such as Sydney flatters his ability.
Sydney were prepared to pay over the odds for him in an attempt to go back to back. We would have been mad, when rebuilding, not to trade him.
It dosen't mean that I am unhappy for his success in Sydney. I just dont think that we would have been a better side with him in.
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 6:18 pm
by billyduckworth
I think you've summed it up pretty well. Good on him being successful with Sydney but we really don't miss him either.
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 6:38 pm
by danstar84
Makaveli wrote:Richards was a very handy player, should never of let him go and should have gotten more chances. Good work sheeds..
It was his decision to go. A 'very handy player' is pushing it a bit ...
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 6:53 pm
by robbie67
"Handy" players must only have to get it 8 times a game. Welsh must be a superstar then.
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 6:54 pm
by robbie67
Jazz_84 wrote:robbie67 wrote:Windy_Hill wrote:Teddy is a tease.
Its the one or two games where he shines that allows him to get away with half a dozen where he does nothing. He is a batsman who averages around 35. Sometimes a decent score will come along but in the main, you need guys averaging 40-50.
Does that make any sense at all??
Yes, he is Mark Waugh without the style. A good side can carry him, but he was exposed in a poor one.
mark waugh was the one that carried sides
im glad teddy went to sydney never liked him so he fits nicely at sydney
You must be talking about Mark's state side career.
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 7:15 pm
by F111
Regardless of all chat re: Ted, I was very happy to sit and watch him win a final. Good luck to him.
Posted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 7:23 pm
by fordmania
danstar84 wrote:He is ok, but nothing spectacular. Was sad to see him go, but I think that Dempesay will offer us a lot more in the upcoming years.
I'm with you Danstar. Was sad to see him go but I can see that Dempesay will offer us plenty in the future with his dash along the wings.