Great Fightback that should have not been needed.
Posted: Mon May 28, 2007 6:46 pm
Absolutely great to witness the win after the fightback but we should not have been in the position to be behind at that stage, we should have been at least 5 goals ahead but due to some appalling kicking for goal from SET SHOTS, most from inside 50 almost cost us the game like against North & the Carlton Dicks. More practice required at training but mostly required is to get their mental state straight when taking a shot. Be Positive!
As for that "supposed missed free kick" to the big sulk, i did not see him spit the dummey when he was awarded a very soft free kick in the 2nd quarter from which he goaled. I was sitting near that incident & could not see anything but the maggots must have unusually alert to a minor touch on the big sulk. Anyway i reckon we have been penalised a lot this year from this rule & has cost us dearly.
Overall it was good to win but i think Hille needs some help in the ruck, Laycock needs to play , ( notice that Cartledge was among the best for the VFL side, why was he delisted & Bolton retained?), keep Paddy down back where he is doing a great job. Also more pace required in midfield Campo to make way for Lovett etc. when they are fit.
As for that "supposed missed free kick" to the big sulk, i did not see him spit the dummey when he was awarded a very soft free kick in the 2nd quarter from which he goaled. I was sitting near that incident & could not see anything but the maggots must have unusually alert to a minor touch on the big sulk. Anyway i reckon we have been penalised a lot this year from this rule & has cost us dearly.
Overall it was good to win but i think Hille needs some help in the ruck, Laycock needs to play , ( notice that Cartledge was among the best for the VFL side, why was he delisted & Bolton retained?), keep Paddy down back where he is doing a great job. Also more pace required in midfield Campo to make way for Lovett etc. when they are fit.