Should Campbell Brown be charged simulation

timbercote · Post by **timbercote** » Wed May 30, 2007 5:52 pm

If Judd is not guilty of Eye Gouging, surely Brown is guilty of simulating the alleged offence and should be brought before the tribunal.

What do you think?

BenDoolan · Post by **BenDoolan** » Wed May 30, 2007 5:54 pm

I reckon the whole system is rigged just like the whole competition itself.

Boyler_Room · Post by **Boyler_Room** » Wed May 30, 2007 6:35 pm

That's a little cynical isn't it BD?

I think Brown should be charged with grievous bodily harm against Chris Judd.

Post by **Megan** » Wed May 30, 2007 7:36 pm

The only thing Brown is guilty of is being a lying little tossbag. He should've fronted up and told the truth and gotten Judd rubbed out for a week.

pear · Post by **pear** » Thu May 31, 2007 9:12 am

Q: What's Chris Judd's new nickname

A: Hopoate

(He got his finger stuck in a Brown eye).

nathanskinner · Post by **nathanskinner** » Thu May 31, 2007 12:34 pm

BenDoolan wrote:I reckon the whole system is rigged just like the whole competition itself.

I agree. 'Trying to get Cambell Brown off of himself...' does that include a finger in the eye? His fingers were bent into a claw, who palms someone off like that? I would have been happy with a week.

Isnt it also an instant free kick if there is contact to the face?

Ah well. Would be nice if WCE beat North, draw us closer I suppose.

robrulz5 · Post by **robrulz5** » Thu May 31, 2007 3:55 pm

Players need to stop lying for eachother.