Page 1 of 1
Should Campbell Brown be charged simulation
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 5:52 pm
by timbercote
If Judd is not guilty of Eye Gouging, surely Brown is guilty of simulating the alleged offence and should be brought before the tribunal.
What do you think?
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 5:54 pm
by BenDoolan
I reckon the whole system is rigged just like the whole competition itself.
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 6:35 pm
by Boyler_Room
That's a little cynical isn't it BD?
I think Brown should be charged with grievous bodily harm against Chris Judd.
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 7:36 pm
by Megan
The only thing Brown is guilty of is being a lying little tossbag. He should've fronted up and told the truth and gotten Judd rubbed out for a week.
Posted: Thu May 31, 2007 9:12 am
by pear
Q: What's Chris Judd's new nickname
A: Hopoate
(He got his finger stuck in a Brown eye).
Posted: Thu May 31, 2007 12:34 pm
by nathanskinner
BenDoolan wrote:I reckon the whole system is rigged just like the whole competition itself.
I agree. 'Trying to get Cambell Brown off of himself...' does that include a finger in the eye? His fingers were bent into a claw, who palms someone off like that? I would have been happy with a week.
Isnt it also an instant free kick if there is contact to the face?
Ah well. Would be nice if WCE beat North, draw us closer I suppose.
Posted: Thu May 31, 2007 3:55 pm
by robrulz5
Players need to stop lying for eachother.