Page 1 of 10

Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2007 12:19 pm
by Ramanama
I dont recall this???

Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2007 12:20 pm
by robrulz5
He'll get off. How many times has Goodes done that this year and got off!

Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2007 12:21 pm
by Doctor Fish
No way!!! Tell me you're telling porkies Filth...

Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2007 12:22 pm
by Ramanama
What happend, i dont remember?

Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2007 12:22 pm
by jimmyc1985
Soft. Won't....correction, shouldn't get anything. If the umpire was standing right there at the time and chose not to report him, that's a strong factor in favour of Lloyd getting nothing more than a reprimand.

But as is well document, you just dunno with these things.

Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2007 12:23 pm
by Madden
Lloyd hasn't got a good record. Trouble.

Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2007 1:20 pm
by BenDoolan
3 weeks

Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2007 1:28 pm
by Rossoneri
BenDoolan wrote:3 weeks
You're kidding!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2007 1:36 pm
by Madden
BenDoolan wrote:3 weeks
OH F*CK THAT

Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2007 1:38 pm
by Madden
Source? Neither Blitz nor AFL websites reporting it.

Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2007 1:39 pm
by bomberdonnie
Imagine he is pissing the take

Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2007 1:40 pm
by Madden
bomberdonnie wrote:Imagine he is pissing the take
Piss takes are funny. That ain't f*ckin funny....

Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2007 1:42 pm
by bomberdonnie
Staggy wrote:
bomberdonnie wrote:Imagine he is pissing the take
Piss takes are funny. That ain't f*ckin funny....
Agree but surely 3 weeks can not be serious??

Although we are talking about the AFL and its MRC !!!

Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2007 1:47 pm
by dom_105
tribunal news

Matthew Lloyd has been reported for charging Nathan Carroll in Friday night's game against Melbourne.
http://www.essendonfc.com.au/news/weekly.asp#tribunal

Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2007 2:07 pm
by BenDoolan
Sorry, I underestimated..........4 weeks at least.

Haven't seen it. Don't know what the f*** they're on about. But the tribunal is a f***** unit indeed.

Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2007 2:10 pm
by dingus
Filthy wrote:
Staggy wrote:Lloyd hasn't got a good record. Trouble.
http://www.essendonfc.com.au/news/weekly.asp#tribunal

Stag....when they brought in the new system they threw out all the "priors" or at least I am pretty sure they did. Lloydy hasn't been up since.

This has got to be the greatest load of bullshit I have ever seen. He gets decked after missing a goal and HE gets reported!!

Can't ******* believe it. :evil:
No, Filth, they kept them. I remember the example being Fletcher, for a one week type incident, because of his record, would atomatically have his penalty doubled.

Wanker administration, wanker system. Wankers.

Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2007 2:12 pm
by andrewb
Not the end of the world if it happens, I'm not expecting us to win this game and it would be a great opportunity for Johns or Bradley to step up and get some valuable experience up forward in a pressure cooker environment.

If Lloyd is out, it will also mean that my geelong supporting mates will have less to say on monday as they'll be heavy favourites. And, if we win without him I won't shut up for months.

Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2007 3:02 pm
by Megan
Shit decision.

We can win without Lloyd tho.

I expect he'll get off.

Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2007 4:18 pm
by boncer34
Lloyd took a hit after the siren. Ran down and gave Carrol a nudge and the "melee" started. I remember that one.

Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2007 4:33 pm
by BenDoolan
Haha, f***, was that it?

I remember the guy next to me shouting at Lloyd because he felt he was undisciplined and thought he wasn't showing leadership qualities. Had no idea what he was on about (I was obviously too busy thumping my leg when Lloyd missed that goal on the siren). WOW, what a crime!!!!