Bombers "furious"

Rossoneri · Post by **Rossoneri** » Tue Jul 03, 2007 8:27 am

I had a good laugh when I heard that Lloydy got reported.

If he goes for that I hope we challenge it again to the appeals board, and then keep going to the courts if we can. What a joke!!!!!!!!!!

dheal · Post by **dheal** » Tue Jul 03, 2007 8:42 am

An absolute joke if Lloydy gets suspended, whats the differance between the Fevola & Didak incident (now there's two mental giants) & the Goodes incident's earlier this year. Using the same principle why was'nt Carrol cited for doing similar to Lloyd, again why was'nt Lloyd given another shot for goal after the first incident. Answer weak insipid umpiring, if they could'nt get us on Friday night they would on Monday. Incidentally was'nt it he same FAGGOT/MAGGOT who pinged our runner?

Doctor Fish · Post by **Doctor Fish** » Tue Jul 03, 2007 9:49 am

Needless to say, those mental giants on "On The Couch" reckon he deserves to go for the week. Unbiased journalism at its best...

BenDoolan · Post by **BenDoolan** » Tue Jul 03, 2007 9:51 am

Q. How do you make interstate clubs strong and powerful?

A. By giving them years of salary cap concessions, draft concessions and tribunal concessions.

F****** CORRUPTION. I've been saying it for years.

paddyl90 · Post by **paddyl90** » Tue Jul 03, 2007 11:43 am

That's some great supporting evidence. Why the f**k are we even talking about this it shouldn't even have been up. Ridiculous how embarassing AFL turning into netball day by day.

robrulz5 · Post by **robrulz5** » Tue Jul 03, 2007 11:46 am

Tredrea did what Hille did to Charman up at the Gabba last year. Hille got suspended and Tredrea gets nothing.

Leo Barry did what Hille did a couple of weeks ago and got off.

Is David Hille the new Fletch when it comes to the tribunal???

tom9779 · Post by **tom9779** » Tue Jul 03, 2007 12:53 pm

Lloyd should not have gotten a week.

its simple, they must review the last 5 cases of a particular charge thats been taken to the tribunal to ensure consistency.

eg. look at the last 5 times someone was reported for charging, compare them all, and just keep a consistent penalty.

based on what has and hasn't been suspension worthy, Lloyd is stiff.

The AFL love making an example out of essendon.

we have made them look like the joke they are after the armband fiasco.

Rossoneri · Post by **Rossoneri** » Tue Jul 03, 2007 12:57 pm

I think the MRP and the rules committee are having a competition on who can be the most stupidest group of people to make decisions.

robrulz5 · Post by **robrulz5** » Tue Jul 03, 2007 12:59 pm

I'd say it's dead even at the moment.

ZRS · Post by **ZRS** » Tue Jul 03, 2007 1:13 pm

Filthy wrote:
dheal wrote:An absolute joke if Lloydy gets suspended, whats the differance between the Fevola & Didak incident (now there's two mental giants) & the Goodes incident's earlier this year. Using the same principle why was'nt Carrol cited for doing similar to Lloyd, again why was'nt Lloyd given another shot for goal after the first incident. Answer weak insipid umpiring, if they could'nt get us on Friday night they would on Monday. Incidentally was'nt it he same FAGGOT/MAGGOT who pinged our runner?
Yep

He'll need to hire Hells Angels for protection if Matty goes.

that wont stop robrulz

robrulz5 · Post by **robrulz5** » Tue Jul 03, 2007 1:18 pm

Of course not...

Boyler_Room · Post by **Boyler_Room** » Tue Jul 03, 2007 7:36 pm

BenDoolan wrote:Q. How do you make interstate clubs strong and powerful?

A. By giving them years of salary cap concessions, draft concessions and tribunal concessions.

F****** CORRUPTION. I've been saying it for years.

Haven't we all?

topdon · Post by **topdon** » Tue Jul 03, 2007 9:26 pm

If they were furious then ... what would they be now?

Boyler_Room · Post by **Boyler_Room** » Tue Jul 03, 2007 9:27 pm

I was just thinking that...

If I were Grun, any of the tribunal panel, Geischen or Ando, I'd be looking over my shoulder for a very long time.