Page 1 of 1

Posted: Tue Jul 03, 2007 8:27 am
by Rossoneri
I had a good laugh when I heard that Lloydy got reported.

If he goes for that I hope we challenge it again to the appeals board, and then keep going to the courts if we can. What a joke!!!!!!!!!!

Posted: Tue Jul 03, 2007 8:42 am
by dheal
An absolute joke if Lloydy gets suspended, whats the differance between the Fevola & Didak incident (now there's two mental giants) & the Goodes incident's earlier this year. Using the same principle why was'nt Carrol cited for doing similar to Lloyd, again why was'nt Lloyd given another shot for goal after the first incident. Answer weak insipid umpiring, if they could'nt get us on Friday night they would on Monday. Incidentally was'nt it he same FAGGOT/MAGGOT who pinged our runner?

Posted: Tue Jul 03, 2007 9:49 am
by Doctor Fish
Needless to say, those mental giants on "On The Couch" reckon he deserves to go for the week. Unbiased journalism at its best...

:roll:

Posted: Tue Jul 03, 2007 9:51 am
by BenDoolan
Q. How do you make interstate clubs strong and powerful?

A. By giving them years of salary cap concessions, draft concessions and tribunal concessions.

F****** CORRUPTION. I've been saying it for years.

Posted: Tue Jul 03, 2007 11:43 am
by paddyl90
That's some great supporting evidence. Why the f**k are we even talking about this it shouldn't even have been up. Ridiculous how embarassing AFL turning into netball day by day.

Posted: Tue Jul 03, 2007 11:46 am
by robrulz5
Tredrea did what Hille did to Charman up at the Gabba last year. Hille got suspended and Tredrea gets nothing.

Leo Barry did what Hille did a couple of weeks ago and got off.

Is David Hille the new Fletch when it comes to the tribunal???

Posted: Tue Jul 03, 2007 12:53 pm
by tom9779
Lloyd should not have gotten a week.

its simple, they must review the last 5 cases of a particular charge thats been taken to the tribunal to ensure consistency.

eg. look at the last 5 times someone was reported for charging, compare them all, and just keep a consistent penalty.

based on what has and hasn't been suspension worthy, Lloyd is stiff.

The AFL love making an example out of essendon.

we have made them look like the joke they are after the armband fiasco.

Posted: Tue Jul 03, 2007 12:57 pm
by Rossoneri
I think the MRP and the rules committee are having a competition on who can be the most stupidest group of people to make decisions.

Posted: Tue Jul 03, 2007 12:59 pm
by robrulz5
I'd say it's dead even at the moment.

Posted: Tue Jul 03, 2007 1:13 pm
by ZRS
Filthy wrote:
dheal wrote:An absolute joke if Lloydy gets suspended, whats the differance between the Fevola & Didak incident (now there's two mental giants) & the Goodes incident's earlier this year. Using the same principle why was'nt Carrol cited for doing similar to Lloyd, again why was'nt Lloyd given another shot for goal after the first incident. Answer weak insipid umpiring, if they could'nt get us on Friday night they would on Monday. Incidentally was'nt it he same FAGGOT/MAGGOT who pinged our runner?
Yep :evil:

He'll need to hire Hells Angels for protection if Matty goes.
that wont stop robrulz :wink:

Posted: Tue Jul 03, 2007 1:18 pm
by robrulz5
Of course not... :lol:

Posted: Tue Jul 03, 2007 7:36 pm
by Boyler_Room
BenDoolan wrote:Q. How do you make interstate clubs strong and powerful?

A. By giving them years of salary cap concessions, draft concessions and tribunal concessions.

F****** CORRUPTION. I've been saying it for years.
Haven't we all?

Posted: Tue Jul 03, 2007 9:26 pm
by topdon
If they were furious then ... what would they be now?

Posted: Tue Jul 03, 2007 9:27 pm
by Boyler_Room
I was just thinking that...

If I were Grun, any of the tribunal panel, Geischen or Ando, I'd be looking over my shoulder for a very long time.