Votes - Round 20 v Scum

dom_105 · Post by **dom_105** » Sat Aug 18, 2007 4:50 pm

3. Campo - 35 touches, got it done in the centre.
2. Lloyd - Kicked a bag, big lift on last week.
1. Lovett - Had a blinder of a last term when the game was on the line. kicked the sealer.

Hird, Fries, McPhee, Stants.

Tanks Carlton.

andrewb · Post by **andrewb** » Sat Aug 18, 2007 4:56 pm

3. Monfries
2. Campo
1. McPhee

Those three got us back in the game. Apologies to Nash, Lloyd, Hird, Lovett.

jimmyc1985 · Post by **jimmyc1985** » Sat Aug 18, 2007 4:57 pm

3. Michael
2. Monfries
1. Lloyd

stonersmate · Post by **stonersmate** » Sat Aug 18, 2007 5:07 pm

1.Lloyd
2. Micheal
3. Stants

n hird, monfries.

Splodge · Post by **Splodge** » Sat Aug 18, 2007 5:09 pm

3 votes Monfries
2 votes Lloyd
1 vote Hird

apologies campo, laycock

robbie67 · Post by **robbie67** » Sat Aug 18, 2007 5:11 pm

5. Michael (best game for Essendon)
4. Campo (see above)
3. Monfries
2. McPhee (much better)
1. Lovett (see above)

I would have given Lloyd 2 or 3 if he hadnt missed the sitter. Captains kick em.

sconsey · Post by **sconsey** » Sat Aug 18, 2007 5:28 pm

5.Monfries (Finding some touch, career high disposals)
4.Campo (Plenty of ball, and used it quite good)
3.Lloyd (Stayed closer to goal (mostly)...Much better!)
2.Lovett (Pulled the finger out, and showed us what he can do)
1.Mcphee (Great across Half Forward all day)

Apologies: Hird (Damn, don't retire!), Michael and Nash

jimmyc1985 · Post by **jimmyc1985** » Sat Aug 18, 2007 5:39 pm

Lovett getting votes suggests psychologists aren't pulling our legs about the information recency effect.

sconsey · Post by **sconsey** » Sat Aug 18, 2007 5:49 pm

jimmyc1985 wrote:Lovett getting votes suggests psychologists aren't pulling our legs about the information recency effect.

He may not have been the best out there, but when we needed the spark he was there. Great defensive pressure, and also ran well, setting up several attacks. Let's just hope he is building the 'platform' for the rest of the year, and beyond.

BenDoolan · Post by **BenDoolan** » Sat Aug 18, 2007 6:03 pm

3. Mal Michael
2. Jason Laycock
1. Matthew Lloyd

Apologies to Monfries, Nash, Campo, Stanton, McPhee

Boyler_Room · Post by **Boyler_Room** » Sat Aug 18, 2007 6:15 pm

BenDoolan wrote:3. Mal Michael
2. Jason Laycock
1. Matthew Lloyd

Apologies to Monfries, Nash, Campo, Stanton, McPhee

Was wondering when he'd make the list. Haven't seen the game yet but listened to most of the 3AW call and heard the stats... sounds like he was sensational. Leading clearances, contested possessions, hitouts... took some important marks etc...

I'll stop ranting (this is the votes thread) but am surprised he hasn't been named other than by BD.

F111 · Post by **F111** » Sat Aug 18, 2007 6:16 pm

3. 17 Best game he's played for Carlton in 5 years.
2. 27
1. 5

gringo · Post by **gringo** » Sat Aug 18, 2007 6:35 pm

5. Lloyd
4. Campo
3. Michael
2. Lovett
1. Laycock

Hird, Nash, McPhee and Monfries were also excellent. Good work at the selection table this week. Picked a team that could win the game.

BenDoolan · Post by **BenDoolan** » Sat Aug 18, 2007 6:35 pm

Boyler_Room wrote:
BenDoolan wrote:3. Mal Michael
2. Jason Laycock
1. Matthew Lloyd

Apologies to Monfries, Nash, Campo, Stanton, McPhee
Was wondering when he'd make the list. Haven't seen the game yet but listened to most of the 3AW call and heard the stats... sounds like he was sensational. Leading clearances, contested possessions, hitouts... took some important marks etc...

I'll stop ranting (this is the votes thread) but am surprised he hasn't been named other than by BD.

Very good in the air today. Competed very well in the ruck and actually placed some excellent palm outs to our guys. When he was beaten for the tap, he actually roved it and cleared it. His work at ground level was fantastic. I gave him a big rocket a few weeks ago, only because I know what he is capable of. He can be anything this boy.

Madden · Post by **Madden** » Sat Aug 18, 2007 7:09 pm

3. Camporeale
2. Lloyd
1. Laycock

pear · Post by **pear** » Sat Aug 18, 2007 7:12 pm

Campo can f off back to Carlton. 35 nothing stats, plenty of lateral movement and turnovers and zero running the other way as usual.

gringo · Post by **gringo** » Sat Aug 18, 2007 7:14 pm

pear wrote:Campo can f off back to Carlton. 35 nothing stats, plenty of lateral movement and turnovers and zero running the other way as usual.

I agree to an extent, but he had ten inside 50s and most were straight to our boys. Lovely skills, knows where to get it, and makes far far far far far far far far less errors than most of our midfielders. WOuld love to see him back next year.

He doesn't run the other way, but no one seems to in our team.

bueller · Post by **bueller** » Sat Aug 18, 2007 7:15 pm

Tough to vote today, always a good sign.. so i have to give 5 votes.

5. Campo
4. Monfries
3. Lovett
2. Lloyd
1. Nash

Apologies to McPhee, Laycock, Stanton and Ryder.

Shows how many players put their hands up in the 2nd half.

KaaN10 · Post by **KaaN10** » Sat Aug 18, 2007 7:22 pm

pear wrote:Campo can f off back to Carlton. 35 nothing stats, plenty of lateral movement and turnovers and zero running the other way as usual.

Worse comment of the day.

pear · Post by **pear** » Sat Aug 18, 2007 7:33 pm

KaaN10 wrote:
pear wrote:Campo can f off back to Carlton. 35 nothing stats, plenty of lateral movement and turnovers and zero running the other way as usual.
Worse comment of the day.

If you were at the ground and can honestly say you saw him ever run the other way I would be very surprised . . .