Rising Stars Nominees 2004-2007
Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2007 11:39 am
This is a list of the number of rising star nominees per year (2004-2007) per team and the total over the last four years. I've ordered it by the total number of nominees (in descending order).
Team --|-- 2004 --|-- 2005 --|-- 2006 --|-- 2007 --|-- Total
Brisbane Lions --|-- 1 --|-- 4 --|-- 3 --|-- 2 --|-- 10
Melbourne --|-- 3 --|-- 2 --|-- 3 --|-- 2 --|-- 10
Port Adelaide --|-- 1 --|-- 0 --|-- 4 --|-- 3 --|-- 8
WC Eagles --|-- 4 --|-- 1 --|-- 2 --|-- 1 --|-- 8
Collingwood --|-- 1 --|-- 1 --|-- 2 --|-- 3 --|-- 7
Carlton --|-- 2 --|-- 2 --|-- 1 --|-- 1 --|-- 6
Geelong --|-- 2 --|-- 2 --|-- 0 --|-- 2 --|-- 6
Richmond --|-- 2 --|-- 1 --|-- 3 --|-- 0 --|-- 6
West Bulldogs --|-- 2 --|-- 2 --|-- 0 --|-- 2 --|-- 6
Hawthorn --|-- 0 --|-- 3 --|-- 2 --|-- 0 --|-- 5
Kangaroos --|-- 1 --|-- 0 --|-- 2 --|-- 2 --|-- 5
Essendon --|-- 1 --|-- 2 --|-- 0 --|-- 1 --|-- 4
Adelaide --|-- 1 --|-- 0 --|-- 0 --|-- 0 --|-- 1
Fremantle --|-- 0 --|-- 1 --|-- 0 --|-- 0 --|-- 1
St. Kilda --|-- 0 --|-- 0 --|-- 0 --|-- 1 --|-- 1
Sydney Swans --|-- 1 --|-- 0 --|-- 0 --|-- 0 --|-- 1
Some key points:
1. Assuming that rising star nominations are a good judge of development, the best teams at developing young kids seem to be Brisbane, Melbourne, Port and West Coast.
Neale Daniher is in some good company there. But more interestingly, none of those teams have had a priority pick in the last five years.
2. Using the same logic, Adelaide, Freo, St Kilda and Sydney have been the worst at development and some (particularly Adelaide and Sydney who have aging lists) will probably face a protracted period of decline.
3. The teams that have had the earliest picks in recent drafts 02-05 (Carlton, St Kilda, Footscray, Richmond, Collingwood) haven't necessarily translated those picks into players.
Perhaps the reverend IS the right guy to develop our list?
Team --|-- 2004 --|-- 2005 --|-- 2006 --|-- 2007 --|-- Total
Brisbane Lions --|-- 1 --|-- 4 --|-- 3 --|-- 2 --|-- 10
Melbourne --|-- 3 --|-- 2 --|-- 3 --|-- 2 --|-- 10
Port Adelaide --|-- 1 --|-- 0 --|-- 4 --|-- 3 --|-- 8
WC Eagles --|-- 4 --|-- 1 --|-- 2 --|-- 1 --|-- 8
Collingwood --|-- 1 --|-- 1 --|-- 2 --|-- 3 --|-- 7
Carlton --|-- 2 --|-- 2 --|-- 1 --|-- 1 --|-- 6
Geelong --|-- 2 --|-- 2 --|-- 0 --|-- 2 --|-- 6
Richmond --|-- 2 --|-- 1 --|-- 3 --|-- 0 --|-- 6
West Bulldogs --|-- 2 --|-- 2 --|-- 0 --|-- 2 --|-- 6
Hawthorn --|-- 0 --|-- 3 --|-- 2 --|-- 0 --|-- 5
Kangaroos --|-- 1 --|-- 0 --|-- 2 --|-- 2 --|-- 5
Essendon --|-- 1 --|-- 2 --|-- 0 --|-- 1 --|-- 4
Adelaide --|-- 1 --|-- 0 --|-- 0 --|-- 0 --|-- 1
Fremantle --|-- 0 --|-- 1 --|-- 0 --|-- 0 --|-- 1
St. Kilda --|-- 0 --|-- 0 --|-- 0 --|-- 1 --|-- 1
Sydney Swans --|-- 1 --|-- 0 --|-- 0 --|-- 0 --|-- 1
Some key points:
1. Assuming that rising star nominations are a good judge of development, the best teams at developing young kids seem to be Brisbane, Melbourne, Port and West Coast.
Neale Daniher is in some good company there. But more interestingly, none of those teams have had a priority pick in the last five years.
2. Using the same logic, Adelaide, Freo, St Kilda and Sydney have been the worst at development and some (particularly Adelaide and Sydney who have aging lists) will probably face a protracted period of decline.
3. The teams that have had the earliest picks in recent drafts 02-05 (Carlton, St Kilda, Footscray, Richmond, Collingwood) haven't necessarily translated those picks into players.
Perhaps the reverend IS the right guy to develop our list?