Can all The Cousin's 'Bleeding Hearts' Get Real

Talk about everything Essendon. Past, Present and Future if it's about the Bombers this is the place to be.
User avatar
Windy_Hill
Champion of Essendon
Posts: 12859
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:23 pm

Can all The Cousin's 'Bleeding Hearts' Get Real

Post by Windy_Hill »

I am so sick of reading posts even remotely supporting this pathetic nong.

His record is appaling, he has deliberately evaded the law on numerous occasions to avoid arrest for DUI or Substance Abuse, he hangs with known criminals and gets into fights with his own teamates. He is the last guy to be with Mainwaring before he died (of drug abuse it would seem) and he ws found comatose in the gutter outside of the Crown Casino!!!

What more evidence do you need to charge this perpetual offender with bringing the game into disrepute.

The fact he even got this far in his career is a travesty of justice.
User avatar
swoodley
Champion of Essendon
Posts: 7233
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 9:08 pm
Location: Perth

Post by swoodley »

Agreed
"You can quote me on this... He is gawn" - bomberdonnie re Hurley's contract status 25 February 2012
Rossoneri
Essendon Legend
Posts: 15243
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 9:10 pm
Location: Bundoora

Post by Rossoneri »

Didak gets involved with criminals, was at the scene where shots were fired at police, then lied about it.

Why hasnt the AFL sanctioned him?
User avatar
swoodley
Champion of Essendon
Posts: 7233
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 9:08 pm
Location: Perth

Post by swoodley »

As I said in the other Cousins thread, Didak's has been a one off incident whereas Cousins has a list of transgressions against his name.
"You can quote me on this... He is gawn" - bomberdonnie re Hurley's contract status 25 February 2012
Rossoneri
Essendon Legend
Posts: 15243
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 9:10 pm
Location: Bundoora

Post by Rossoneri »

swoodley wrote:As I said in the other Cousins thread, Didak's has been a one off incident whereas Cousins has a list of transgressions against his name.
Hasnt tested positive to a drug charge yet. So far all he has done is been fined for evading a booze bus and refusing a blood test. Is that bringing the game into disrepute?

What about the guys who have already tested positive to cocaine?
I think the AFL are just trying to show people that they are doing a good job, even though its their flawed system that was shown up by Cousins having never been tested.

Didaks indiscretion involved a shooting at cops, how many games was he suspended for? How much was he fined?

Cousins copped a 16-week ban, despite never testing positive.
User avatar
ealesy
Champion of Essendon
Posts: 5580
Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 8:19 pm

Post by ealesy »

Rossoneri wrote:
swoodley wrote:As I said in the other Cousins thread, Didak's has been a one off incident whereas Cousins has a list of transgressions against his name.
Hasnt tested positive to a drug charge yet. So far all he has done is been fined for evading a booze bus and refusing a blood test. Is that bringing the game into disrepute?
refused to co-operate with the police investigating a serious incident.

has known links to Perth underworld figures.

and while he has never failed a drug test....both he and his father have admitted he had a substance abuse problem....so who the f*** gives a flying f*** whether he has tested postive or not, by his own admission he has used, he simply hasn't been caught.

That doesn't mean he should get credit...all it does is show the flaws in the AFL drug testing regime.

And his 16 week ban was imposed by the club, not the AFL...sure the AFL might have imposed a ban if the club didn't but the fact remains that it was still a club ban.

And Didak indiscretion involved him being in a car with someone who shot at the cops....it's not like he shot at the cops himself....it was a one off incident and the club slapped him with heavy sanctions straight away and warned him than any further even minor indiscretions he would be boned.

Maybe if West Coast did that with Cousins at his first serious indescretions instead of waiting for 5 years until everything turned to shit, he would not be in this current situation!!
User avatar
AnarchicBomber
Regular Senior Player
Posts: 1787
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 9:22 pm

Post by AnarchicBomber »

Philosophically I believe no-one has a right to tell another person how much compassion they can or cannot feel towards someone else. No-one must feel compelled to go by any order other than what comes from their heart.
User avatar
Stocksy
On the Rookie List
Posts: 488
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 5:44 pm

Post by Stocksy »

So basically Ealsey, the AFL needs to now aprove all players friends, if a player wants to add a new freind tio there circle they must first get approval from Sir Vlad...

Get out of your f****** glass houses here, he is a football player, not ****** royalty. Go back through your mates, old and new, and tell me that you have never hung around with anyone who wasn't questionable one way or another. Tell me you never experimented with any sort of drug or anything else illegal...

The only thing that is bringing this game into disrepute are the f****** clowns running it....
Here's to swimming with bow legged women...
grassy1
Champion of Essendon
Posts: 12313
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 8:48 pm

Post by grassy1 »

You siure you're not GARY STOCKS(West Coast SPIN DOCTOR),Stocksy?

After the above SPIEL,I 'd have an awfull time thinking otherwise.Are you serously trying to suggest he should still ASSOCIATE himself with NOTORIOUS Figures in the PERTH UNDERWORLD?

He has the WRONG CIRCLE of FRIENDS if those outside that culture CAN'T DRAG him away from such BAD INFLUENCES.

' And he still has NOT PUBLICLY DISOWNED these people.A wise move for Career Prolongment with WEST COAST.But he couldn't help himself.

And even if he beats the wrap,how does he explain his association with the fella who was BOOKED on MULTIPLE CHARGES in the same INCIDENT!

A casual acquaintance perhaps?Not like they were complete strangers and just happened to be in the same area at the wrong time.He,Chick,the young woman and Cousins were all up to no good and IN IT together.

He might also have to explain that if it wasn't him who supplied MAINWARING with the stuff that killed him,WHO DID?!

And do so PUBLICLY!He's DUG himself in too deep,because if it wasn't him,he won't ever say will he?Even if his Career still depends on it.

Enough of the SPIN Stocksy!
User avatar
Stocksy
On the Rookie List
Posts: 488
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 5:44 pm

Post by Stocksy »

grassy1 wrote:You siure you're not GARY STOCKS(West Coast SPIN DOCTOR),Stocksy?



He might also have to explain that if it wasn't him who supplied MAINWARING with the stuff that killed him,WHO DID?!

!
Relation only Grassy...

But its this crap here that unless you have something to back it up should not even be written...

Do you know he supplied anything Grassy?

Do you know Mainwaring rang Ben for a supplier Grassy?

Lets not forget, Mainwaring loved a party long before Ben came on the scene... And what ever the situation, Mainwaring (a top bloke) left behind 2 young kids and a wife, what happened was a tragedy, not a noose to be tied around someone else's neck.

Get out of your glass demon house Grassy...
Here's to swimming with bow legged women...
grassy1
Champion of Essendon
Posts: 12313
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 8:48 pm

Post by grassy1 »

Please mate,you heard the Test results(made public) that got 'im or were you out of town for a whole MONTH?

A LETHAL COCKTAIL of ILLICIT DRUGS did him in and that is A FACT!THAT is UNDENIABLE FACT!

Talk about TWISTING words out of context.I did NOT imply he supplied Mainwaring with anything.But someone DID!

I posed the question IF it wasn't him,who was it?I certainly did NOT infer Mainwaring called him for anything.FOOD apparrrently wasn't it?Refresh our memories here.

Yes,Mainy's passing is a TRAGEDY and he had a past history that suggests he had NO ONE ELSE to BLAME but himself.

But someone MUST be answerable in supplying the ILLICIT DRUGS that got him.Ben was the LAST person to be seen with him,after Mainwaring ignored his neighbor's offer of HELP!

I'm just curioous why the family hasn't DEMANDED answersas to which FILTHY so and so was the Supplier.I hope to god it wasn't BEN and never ONCE inferred that.

But someone did and there is a CLOUD hanging over his head as a result of it.He MUST CLEAR his name and ensure the ones that most likely did supply the COCKTAIL are BROUGHT TO JUSTICE.

Wouldn't you be demanding answers if any of your kids went the same way?
User avatar
ealesy
Champion of Essendon
Posts: 5580
Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 8:19 pm

Post by ealesy »

Stocksy wrote:So basically Ealsey, the AFL needs to now aprove all players friends, if a player wants to add a new freind tio there circle they must first get approval from Sir Vlad...

Get out of your f****** glass houses here, he is a football player, not ****** royalty. Go back through your mates, old and new, and tell me that you have never hung around with anyone who wasn't questionable one way or another. Tell me you never experimented with any sort of drug or anything else illegal...

The only thing that is bringing this game into disrepute are the f****** clowns running it....
Jesus clam down, merely pointing out that there has been question marks over his off field behaviour, and a number of incidents he has been involved in long before the running from the boose bus and refusing the blood test, that seem to be the only blots on his records according to Rossonerri.
User avatar
keri
Regular Senior Player
Posts: 1228
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 6:38 pm
Location: Wagga Wagga
Contact:

Post by keri »

grassy1 wrote:Please mate,you heard the Test results(made public) that got 'im or were you out of town for a whole MONTH?

A LETHAL COCKTAIL of ILLICIT DRUGS did him in and that is A FACT!THAT is UNDENIABLE FACT!

Talk about TWISTING words out of context.I did NOT imply he supplied Mainwaring with anything.But someone DID!

I posed the question IF it wasn't him,who was it?I certainly did NOT infer Mainwaring called him for anything.FOOD apparrrently wasn't it?Refresh our memories here.

Yes,Mainy's passing is a TRAGEDY and he had a past history that suggests he had NO ONE ELSE to BLAME but himself.

But someone MUST be answerable in supplying the ILLICIT DRUGS that got him.Ben was the LAST person to be seen with him,after Mainwaring ignored his neighbor's offer of HELP!

I'm just curioous why the family hasn't DEMANDED answersas to which FILTHY so and so was the Supplier.I hope to god it wasn't BEN and never ONCE inferred that.

But someone did and there is a CLOUD hanging over his head as a result of it.He MUST CLEAR his name and ensure the ones that most likely did supply the COCKTAIL are BROUGHT TO JUSTICE.

Wouldn't you be demanding answers if any of your kids went the same way?
Grassy, they didn't make the results public at all. The coroner hasn't released them.

And you'd want to have proof that you know it was Cousins who supplied the drugs before you make that implication. As for who did, if he didn't, I'm sure WA isn't short on dealers. I know we aren't in Vic.
"Let's face it. If I didn't exist, you'd pay someone to invent me"
grassy1
Champion of Essendon
Posts: 12313
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 8:48 pm

Post by grassy1 »

No,they did not come from the CORONER,but it got out in the Public Domain all the same.

Who it was that leaked it,no one knows.But we know what got MAINWARING.

We don't know WHO and I don't!I NEVER ONCE IMPLIED it was Ben.But the cloud of suspicion is there,because he was the last person in Mainwaring's presence.

The other overlooked FACT is Mainwaring going OFF HIS TREE before he inevitably attracted outside attention.You could write it off maybe as a BAD NIGHT ON THE TURPS.

But I think you know it was more than that.If it was,it would have been OUT in the PUBLIC DOMAIN in an INSTANT!

WA ain't short on dealers.MIGHT be the same ones that got ANDREW PRETRELIS after a LEAK Traced him to QUEENSLAND.He was supposedly under the WA Witness Protection program.

He was found GAGGED and TIED,plus DEAD in a NAKED state.He was to testify against some NOTORIOUS UNDERWORLD FIGURES,but because of that,CASE CLOSED.

Hub Mainwaring if he truly wants JUSTICE to bring the Supplier to Account,must do more than sit on the results.

He MUST PUBLICLY DEMAND ANSWERES.And FIND THEM!
User avatar
Windy_Hill
Champion of Essendon
Posts: 12859
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:23 pm

Post by Windy_Hill »

keri wrote:

And you'd want to have proof that you know it was Cousins who supplied the drugs before you make that implication.
Were there's smoke...there's fire.
User avatar
keri
Regular Senior Player
Posts: 1228
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 6:38 pm
Location: Wagga Wagga
Contact:

Post by keri »

Or bullshit, windy hill. That steams as well, you know.
"Let's face it. If I didn't exist, you'd pay someone to invent me"
User avatar
keri
Regular Senior Player
Posts: 1228
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 6:38 pm
Location: Wagga Wagga
Contact:

Post by keri »

grassy1 wrote:No,they did not come from the CORONER,but it got out in the Public Domain all the same.

Who it was that leaked it,no one knows.But we know what got MAINWARING.

We don't know WHO and I don't!I NEVER ONCE IMPLIED it was Ben.But the cloud of suspicion is there,because he was the last person in Mainwaring's presence.

The other overlooked FACT is Mainwaring going OFF HIS TREE before he inevitably attracted outside attention.You could write it off maybe as a BAD NIGHT ON THE TURPS.

But I think you know it was more than that.If it was,it would have been OUT in the PUBLIC DOMAIN in an INSTANT!

WA ain't short on dealers.MIGHT be the same ones that got ANDREW PRETRELIS after a LEAK Traced him to QUEENSLAND.He was supposedly under the WA Witness Protection program.

He was found GAGGED and TIED,plus DEAD in a NAKED state.He was to testify against some NOTORIOUS UNDERWORLD FIGURES,but because of that,CASE CLOSED.

Hub Mainwaring if he truly wants JUSTICE to bring the Supplier to Account,must do more than sit on the results.

He MUST PUBLICLY DEMAND ANSWERES.And FIND THEM!
If it didn't come from the Coroner, then it wasn't official and I don't trust it. Yes, we should find answers, but until we do, then I don't think it's sensible to be drawing links where there may or may not be any connection.
"Let's face it. If I didn't exist, you'd pay someone to invent me"
grassy1
Champion of Essendon
Posts: 12313
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 8:48 pm

Post by grassy1 »

It was a whole lot more than an UNTIMELY Heart Attack or Some TERMIJNAL DISEASE he got out of nowhere and you know it!
User avatar
keri
Regular Senior Player
Posts: 1228
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 6:38 pm
Location: Wagga Wagga
Contact:

Post by keri »

I'm not saying it wasn't, but let's not pass it off as fact when it isn't.
"Let's face it. If I didn't exist, you'd pay someone to invent me"
User avatar
Stocksy
On the Rookie List
Posts: 488
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 5:44 pm

Post by Stocksy »

Why must Hub demand answers? to satisfy your curiosity? What's to say he hasn't already been given the answers and he has chose to let it go. No answer is going to bring his son back...
Here's to swimming with bow legged women...
Post Reply