Page 1 of 2

R7: Essendon v Port

Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 11:22 am
by jimmyc1985
Beat ya both, Paddy and BD!

Season's on the line - we're not good enough to come back from 2-5, but at 3-4 and with a week's break to follow and recoup some of our injured players, we're still alive. Port have been a bogey side for us - we've lost to them 9 of the last 10 times we've played them. The side we'll be fielding next week, taking into account the guys we've got injured, will, in my opinion, be the second worst team to take to the field next week (Melbourne being the worst).

Any chance, or will next week be curtains?

Re: R7: Essendon v Port

Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 11:30 am
by hop
We get a 9 day break and it is a home game. The only 2 positives I can see ATM.

Season defining game - you're right about it being almost impossible for us to come back with a 2-5 start to the season.

Win, lose or draw I just want to see some bloody effort and guys putting their bodies on the line. We did it a couple of years ago against these pricks when Lloydy banged and crashed a few bodies and we stood up to them and won.

I'm hoping for a similar outcome on Sunday. Hoping but not confident.

May the 4th be with us!

Re: R7: Essendon v Port

Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 12:26 pm
by andrewb
Seriously second worst?

Grand finallist last year with the shortest injury list in the competition.

They'll smash us.

Re: R7: Essendon v Port

Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 12:47 pm
by Rossoneri
Wont even get close.

Re: R7: Essendon v Port

Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 1:08 pm
by Royza
If Port bring their die in the arse in the last team with them, we're a chance.

Re: R7: Essendon v Port

Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 1:35 pm
by BenDoolan
Good onya Jimmy :lol:

I've written this season off. Lucas, Fletcher, McVeigh, Davey, Dempsey, Jetta, Lonergan, Neagle, Gumbleton all unavailble next week (although Dempsey has a chance). Port will beat us comfortably. I am more interested in seeing Darcy Daniher getting a game next week along with Myers and any other kid that's available.

Re: R7: Essendon v Port

Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 6:52 pm
by andrewb
Need to field a more mobile side than we did last week.

Out Fletch (inj) and Laycock (not interested).
In Daniher, and one of Dempsey (if available), Hislop (if not suspended), otherwise Myers.

Key defensive match-ups:

Johns / Mal - Tredrea and the resting ruckman (Lade / Brogan)
Daniher - Westhoff or Ebert

Ryder to ruck.

Sadly, there is absolutely no selection pressure at the moment. If Johns is suspended Laycock will have to play.

Re: R7: Essendon v Port

Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 7:17 pm
by KaaN10
andrewb wrote:If Johns is suspended Laycock will have to play.
He'll get off.

Re: R7: Essendon v Port

Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 9:27 pm
by BenDoolan
Well Dempsey didn't play for Bendigo today, so forget him for next week. Can't drop any poor performing midfielder simply because there aint anyone ready to step up from Bendigo. Perhaps Hislop, but to reward him after what he did today would be sending the wrong messages. Darcy Daniher is almost a certainty to debut next week.

Re: R7: Essendon v Port

Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 9:18 am
by billyduckworth
Maybe bring back JJ? I know he turned the ball over a lot for Bendigo yesterday and I know he's slow, but at least he does get the ball and provide a bit of grunt.

Re: R7: Essendon v Port

Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 9:41 am
by BenDoolan
billyduckworth wrote:Maybe bring back JJ? I know he turned the ball over a lot for Bendigo yesterday and I know he's slow, but at least he does get the ball and provide a bit of grunt.
To be honest BD, I was quite shocked at what I saw yesterday. I really felt sad for him. I got the feeling he knows his body can't do what he wants it to do. On several occasions I saw him drop his head and shake it when he was caught with the ball. He has certainly lost his pace and certainly lost his bulldozing type strength, but it also seems that he has lost his awareness. The only spot for him in our team is as a crumbing forward, but he has trouble kicking straight and snapping goals. Can't believe he kicked one on the full from 15 metres out yesterday. However, there are times when he does snag a goal. Other than a FP, I can't really see a position for JJ on the field.

Re: R7: Essendon v Port

Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 9:48 am
by billyduckworth
If that's so, then, sadly, it sounds like it is time to hang up the boots. :(

Re: R7: Essendon v Port

Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 11:14 am
by jimmyc1985
Well, Chad Cornes is going to miss with a broken finger, so that's something i suppose. But unfortunately it appears as though Port have found a bit of form over the last fortnight. Also of concern is the fact that our nemesis, Warren Tredrea, played very well last night - Tredrea in form against us without Fletcher = potential disaster.

Re: R7: Essendon v Port

Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 12:00 pm
by MH_Bomber
Johns / Mal - Tredrea and the resting ruckman (Lade / Brogan)
Can we put this insanity of Johns being a backman to bed once and for all ? If he plays on Tredrea, Tredrea will kick 10. Play him at CHF and see what he can do there. I'd play Ryder on Tredrea allowing him to run off and create from half back. You dont automatically have to play a gorilla on a gorilla.

Re: R7: Essendon v Port

Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 4:03 pm
by Mrs Mercuri
Chad Cornes missing for Port evens up our loss of Fletch i guess but i am a little worried about sunday arvo. Big Mal should play on Tredrea when he is close to goal and Ryder should get the job on Ebert/Westhoff.

Hopefully the guys come out firing after that dismal display on friday. Surely Dempsey and Jetta would be a chance to return? I would keep Johns in the side but keep him up forward, not in the back line.

In: Dempsey/Jetta, Daniher
Out: Fletcher, Monfries/Pears

Re: R7: Essendon v Port

Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 4:12 pm
by Rossoneri
If Jetta and Dempsey are both given another week then Quinn has to go. They are given an extra week for pre-caution, it shows lack of confidence in their conditioning. Dempsey would have done it 5 weeks on Sunday, Jetta 4. A hammy takes 3 weeks MAXIMUM, if it just a strain as they said it is.

In: Demspey, Jetta, Daniher
Out: Fletcher, Johns, Monfries

Re: R7: Essendon v Port

Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 12:15 am
by BenDoolan
MH_Bomber wrote:
Johns / Mal - Tredrea and the resting ruckman (Lade / Brogan)
Can we put this insanity of Johns being a backman to bed once and for all ? If he plays on Tredrea, Tredrea will kick 10. Play him at CHF and see what he can do there. I'd play Ryder on Tredrea allowing him to run off and create from half back. You dont automatically have to play a gorilla on a gorilla.
The key is to stop the supply. If we allow 67 forward entries into Tredrea, he will break Fred Fanning's record even if he has King F****** Kong playing on him. Perhaps Knighta should ditch the "run at all costs" and "take risks" game plan with a close checking scrap. Nothing wrong with resorting to such a tactic because we don't have the talent to carry out his initial plans due to the number of injuries. Time to re-evaluate how the team should play in accordance with the ability of the group at his disposal.

Re: R7: Essendon v Port

Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 12:39 am
by nathanskinner
thing that worries me.. (i know we have had alot of injuries) but our team structure is shuffled every single week. Players could be in completely different positions from week to week, and even from quarter to quarter making things very unsettling, and a big ask for the younger guys. Well drilled teams, like Port Adelaide full of role players will trouble us to say the least.

Lloyd will have to kick a bag, and our 'running game' that we see small glimpses of has to work for atleast over a half to give us any chance.

Re: R7: Essendon v Port

Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 9:52 pm
by Brumaz
Rossoneri wrote:If Jetta and Dempsey are both given another week then Quinn has to go. They are given an extra week for pre-caution, it shows lack of confidence in their conditioning. Dempsey would have done it 5 weeks on Sunday, Jetta 4. A hammy takes 3 weeks MAXIMUM, if it just a strain as they said it is.

In: Demspey, Jetta, Daniher
Out: Fletcher, Johns, Monfries
Thats the main point. You have no idea how bad they were, only the docs and others at Essendon. You should realise by now that what teams say about injuries isn't always 100% accurate

Re: R7: Essendon v Port

Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 10:12 pm
by tom9779
maybe Port will play their twos and rest their senior list. you know so its a bit of a contest between the two teams.

we will get butchered.


maybe we won't, i really want to eat my words.